our twin star

Path	csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:03:08 -0500
Message-ID	<5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:04:08 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject	our twin star
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 170615-0, 06/15/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Lines	31
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-7xfF9yvKuT9hmxyZjarnhGvD1a6x5zaamNrf6kZhUnAQWVxCbn2P2FNJABol/Nce3HhVaDmeHs60jve!y5X/N+gRH329SNN8Ay1LwuPkTOqg0Rok9fGibiz+nfnyN/5LmA0ULZpx9Hg3XAAV40o8pytHU6bj!NaBWgmQOrFQ=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2194
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:636505 sci.physics.relativity:422636 rec.arts.sf.written:473349 alt.astronomy:291492

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with companions
https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis


Now, let me explain it all for yous...

You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died.

Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If
the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to die.

Twin stars are one positive and one negative.

Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years for you
people to catch up with my genuies)

what hasn't been discovered yet ...is

every single person is a twin molded into one person.

That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one.

So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else...
need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin.

(i give them another thousand years to find that out)


The Starmaker

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
  Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
    Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
      Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
          Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
              Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
      Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
            Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
              Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
                Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
                Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
              Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
            Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
    Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
      Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
  Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
    Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
    Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700

csiph-web