Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 29 Oct 2016 23:13:43 -0500
Message-ID	<581573BD.1884@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Sat, 29 Oct 2016 21:14:53 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.
References	<68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com> <58151a13$0$28928$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Lines	45
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-5Xozh3lzpc0faXkxRq4mGiwpJ22EDAwzvyPbVpb8baX41B49bzVxQvYDRNSHIwrW3jWhUeYlzMsoZfO!NSo+g01O1mMG9R3xVS8I4Eg8EHJBRCR4wk4f2df1D5gDFSzXBpgKMEciQENwzoksTmxFmkxiaHcC!Qx85BqFgj/4=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2680
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:378442 sci.physics:602939

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

benj wrote:
> 
> On 10/28/2016 12:35 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>
> >> WikiPedia says: ï¼œï¼œ  The Many-Worlds interpretation is
> >>   an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts
> >>   the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
> >>   and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse.  ï¼žï¼ž
> >>
> >> "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics"
> >> as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect.
> >>
> >> "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random;
> >> nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more.
> >>
> >> Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> >> like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> >> in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> >>
> >> _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> >
> >
> >
> > What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that
> > change your past?
> >
> Starfaker you journalist types are all idiots. You been taking fantasy
> lessons from HVAC?  What you THINK or IMAGINE does not change reality of
> what happened in the past. This is simply insane logic.


if you remember your past..
and it changes..
you change your past..

Now you must make a new
past with your new mother...

and play catch up...
to the present.

You will find
your changed past changes
your present and future.

Thread

Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-27 21:35 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:52 -0400
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 20:53 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 21:34 -0700

csiph-web