Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:33:15 -0500
Message-ID	<5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:35:01 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.
References	<68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Lines	23
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-9VtTFOZZ26Vt0+UJn91qUqUYN39yp2yszmlaAKHT+AMRz7c2/3rqgaAETqFZ2hpbrUc1e/8yTr7VPDc!bN7z9vsOZpVGfqlAw3g8Za6dYTZFwqxepEtfq5vvY06qLDji6nmN2Z/FfHVZgWnIQa3Pb24qdur9!uamdPTCcfDk=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2004
X-Received-Bytes	2095
X-Received-Body-CRC	4287742867
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:378298 sci.physics:602757

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> WikiPedia says: ï¼œï¼œ  The Many-Worlds interpretation is
>   an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts
>   the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
>   and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse.  ï¼žï¼ž
> 
> "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics"
> as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect.
> 
> "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random;
> nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more.
> 
> Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> 
> _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;



What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that
change your past?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-27 21:35 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:52 -0400
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 20:53 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 21:34 -0700

csiph-web