Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #595732
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 03 Sep 2016 18:00:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <57CB5644.3B92@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:01:24 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: Red, Blue and Green |
| References | <nq1q63$bdd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <57C4E58D.7E5A@ix.netcom.com> <57c6195b$0$1272$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> <57C6662E.E58@ix.netcom.com> <57C67DBC.5458@ix.netcom.com> <57C70BCD.7344@ix.netcom.com> <57C9B010.1199@ix.netcom.com> <57CB16D6.5166@ix.netcom.com> <57CB3027.4A81@ix.netcom.com> <57CB4762.5CE7@ix.netcom.com> <cbe453a8-2eb3-4c14-a67a-67c523883852@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 149 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-sXH/2OXyoEejYNDMnahsQjk3C6e0dQ/XEcf8bgoJRaH9QuB2qI+jmPjUebPLdBv4YssWy4XjqV4lLCu!EXsF+q7UAg3DTOg1Rn78WlDH1beTyLneOCKS8JkT3kVMBa5i1mNoPRbaQlQCD2DQke4oaEZgbuzz!vbNSVjr4+3w= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 7003 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:450703 sci.physics:595732 sci.physics.relativity:391497 alt.atheism:2164050 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Marvin Sebourn wrote: > > On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 4:56:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > You can imagine all the problems one encounters > > when trying to paint walls, pictures, etc using > > the primary colors red, green, blue and getting White all the time! > > > > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented, > > > > Red, Blue and Yellow. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benj wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/2016 9:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > i have a question for you... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why are there two primary colors on earth? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is so everything in your life can look like shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I presume you are too young to have ever seen what the old two color > > > > > > > > > technicolor movies used to look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Two Primary Colors are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Blue, Red, Green > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Blue, Red, Yellow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why are there Two primary colors on earth? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I might have to define the word Primary because it's a pattern with yous people not > > > > > > > knowing or understanding the english language....especially in the united states scientific community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > first or highest in rank or importance; chief; principal: > > > > > > > (his primary goals in life.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not, his primaries goals in like, "primary"...meaning One. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > first in order in any series, sequence, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. > > > > > > > constituting or belonging to the first stage in any process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if you look at the definition of the words: > > > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > Art. a color, as red, yellow, or blue, that in mixture yields other colors. > > > > > > > Compare complementary color (def 1), secondary color, tertiary color. > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > Optics. any of a set of monochromatic colors, as red, green, and blue, that are added to match or specify the chromaticity of a stimulus or sample. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There above are Two primary colors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.red, yellow, and blue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.red, green, and blue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both by definition are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) primary-colors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) They are both "first" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3)They are both "the first stage", first in order in any series... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are both First primary colors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is...why are there two "primary" colors on earth? > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if you have a problem with the word "Why", I can change it to > > > > > > "How". > > > > > > > > > > > > How are there two "primary" colors on earth? > > > > > > > > > > Of course...I'm the only one on earth that can answer this physics question correctly.. > > > > > > > > > > It's a mistake! > > > > > > > > > > When the primarys colors red, blue and green first came into being, ...and around > > > > > 4.5 billion years later the earth was formed..making the primary colors > > > > > red, blue and green for pigments didn't work! So, it had to be changed/added > > > > > (a new set of primary colors) from Green to Yellow. > > > > > > > > > > And that fixed the mistake. > > > > > > > > > > Whether the mistake was created by Nature error, or a computer error..regardless...it was corrected. > > > > > > > > Now, can you imagine what it would be like if there was only one set of primary colors, red, blue and green in the entire universe? > > > > > > If you try and paint a picture, using Red, Blue and Green (which mixed will be White) and you add Red to make pink...you'll get White instead! > > > > > > If you buy a jar of White paint, (Red, Blue and Green mixed) and you add Blue...you get White. > > > > > > > > You can imagine all the problems one encounters > > when trying to paint walls, pictures, etc using > > the primary colors red, green, blue and getting White all the time! > > > > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented, > > > > Red, Blue and Yellow. > > Two color Technicolor is interesting, with three-color Technicolor being about eighty years old. > > But your idea of mixing the pigment paints red, green, and blue (such as in watercolors, oils, etc) and obtaining white is nonsense. Yes, it is nonsense..but I didn't say that.. I wrote above: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color Red, Blue and Green are the primary colors of light. Which when mixed together equals White. I also wrote above: > > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented, > > > > Red, Blue and Yellow. My point was...imagine if there was only one primary colors, Red, Blue and Green? But as you see, there are two sets of primary colors http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Viewing the spokes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 12:08 -0500
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-29 18:00 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 21:00 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 01:14 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 22:45 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 04:14 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 21:59 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 23:00 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-30 19:40 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 22:07 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 23:48 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-31 09:54 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-02 10:00 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 13:23 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 11:30 -0700
Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 13:18 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 14:57 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-04 12:46 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green Ergios <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-07 12:32 -0500
Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 12:12 -0700
Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 23:22 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:03 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:06 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 12:52 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 10:01 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:12 -0700
Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:47 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:32 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:39 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-04 20:36 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:08 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 12:32 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 17:51 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:10 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 20:43 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:57 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 21:07 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 01:33 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 20:59 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:41 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 19:43 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 21:29 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:43 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:28 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 17:14 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 21:52 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:49 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 00:50 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:52 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:11 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 16:58 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:40 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:56 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:47 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:24 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:07 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:04 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 12:54 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:47 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:24 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-15 05:12 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:45 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:36 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 12:15 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-09-15 09:15 -0400
Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:48 -0700
Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 15:33 -0700
csiph-web