Re: clock rate

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:22:10 -0500
Message-ID	<57BF2973.378F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:22:59 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: clock rate
References	<05937284-e0db-4343-8360-48fd4ce5c0b8@googlegroups.com> <np5hh9$c8o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fa972fe0-d95d-42b0-aa09-9c0a72eea7a8@googlegroups.com> <np7196$a1l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0c5a50ac-3802-45b1-b832-447d8e49ff58@googlegroups.com> <37139726-ab06-4f5e-ba67-97a2da657e8d@googlegroups.com> <2646195c-06b1-4df5-aed8-d89b90391ada@googlegroups.com> <57B8D4C1.4D25@ix.netcom.com> <a331db0e-7157-4ac6-b0b5-aea95d9ba3ec@googlegroups.com> <57B9E2C5.3CFA@ix.netcom.com> <fb50687f-9335-4a1b-a61a-4d9a8c9747cc@googlegroups.com> <57B9F6A4.7CB8@ix.netcom.com> <121ffd45-0028-4c63-b43c-39358f33559d@googlegroups.com> <57BA2631.7D1A@ix.netcom.com> <8b17f79a-dc94-4794-9ac9-58cf2dc96aa7@googlegroups.com> <27ea6469-d182-403d-af5b-803ac35d846f@googlegroups.com> <57BB9844.7851@ix.netcom.com> <77f0e42a-4a50-4c54-a067-3ce117cc1e72@googlegroups.com> <57BC731E.5669@ix.netcom.com> <5f0d46d7-bca0-4586-9704-1a92408c6468@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	57
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-hU9em/Abo7JnfZBYIyja/woMgSMB4fCXjnIQ6YcpWS0yGVH5W6HLCIWgIcwe1R01BZY+coxhxpNGmys!Vb2x7p9+PKeDvobHt7Ch+fGes2hca7MIFTW91cg7l7ZyttlL9r27dzAvKAyr/idKzaTTL7IuqBe5!ETr2YOxvFic=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	4406
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:594664

Show key headers only | View raw

xxein1@att.net wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 11:59:49 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 8:25:30 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 8:06:02 PM UTC-4, xxe...@att.net wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 6:06:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 2:44:08 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 1:19:21 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 6:06:53 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > xxein1@att.net wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > xxein:  A higher clock ticks faster than a lower clock.  OK.  How fast is it ticking when/as it falls past the lower clock?  Faster or slower?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, of course slower since it is now the lower clock and the other
> > > > > > > clock is higher now, so now it's ticking faster.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No math is required...not even logic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > xxein:  Let's go with something I posted earlier.  Suppose the falling clock was traveling at .9c?  Don't you think the lower (moving) clock would have a slower time rate than the stationary one above it?
> > > > >
> > > > > <<<<<
> > > > > xxein:  Geez I must have been tired.  I don''t know why I wrote the last lines.  While true - they were not what I wanted to write.  Based on the way you write (think) I think what I should have written, you wouldn't have understood anyway.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You asked one question...
> > > >
> > > > On the same time scale, what length of time is needed to record this clock tick rate?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > somebody gave you an answer at the 'relativity' group: 2000 picoseconds
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is that answer you're looking for?
> > >
> > > xxein:  I don't know.  Should it be?
> >
> >
> > Something is wrong...no one seems to understands your questions, and you don't seem to understand their answers.
> 
> xxein:  You are free to not worry and go about your whatever.


your game is over.

Thread

clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 16:08 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 18:48 -0500
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 19:15 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 08:23 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:34 -0700
          Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:39 -0700
            Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 13:11 -0700
              Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 20:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 07:08 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 23:29 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:48 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:10 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:16 +0200
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:25 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 16:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 00:39 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:52 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 07:52 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 07:55 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:07 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 09:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 18:50 +0200
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:23 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:41 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:38 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:01 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:11 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 10:19 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 19:29 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:40 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:47 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 08:49 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:34 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 09:58 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 08:53 +0200
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 02:46 -0700
                Re: clock rate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:20 +0200
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 09:13 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-21 12:29 -0500
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:37 -0700
              Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:08 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 15:42 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 10:20 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:28 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 11:44 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:56 -0700
                Re: clock rate "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 13:09 -0700
                Re: clock rate "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-21 13:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 13:57 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-21 15:07 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-22 11:48 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-22 13:58 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-22 17:26 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-23 05:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-23 09:00 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-24 14:43 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 10:22 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-25 11:31 -0700
                Re: clock rate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-25 12:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-25 17:31 -0500
              Re: clock rate "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 03:11 -0700
                Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 08:47 -0700
  Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-19 12:41 +1000
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-18 22:27 -0700
      Re: clock rate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 07:47 -0500
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-19 11:21 -0700
      Re: clock rate Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-20 16:10 +1000
        Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-20 01:34 -0700
  Re: clock rate Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-08-19 07:47 +0200
  Re: clock rate Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 10:16 -0700
    Re: clock rate xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-21 11:02 -0700

csiph-web