Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #589897
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:57:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <578DB36C.7381@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:58:20 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| References | <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 9 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-4050Kip5iZ2SOykBtL9HgxYmmJ4/n5RRqQnh1ChHc+CAUk6Frr9BkM+iflKlwDUwnAjDOjXXdadCRfQ!rrcHlGbRoeEkir3x+sjG2KyhXgXl72Pp3HgnzdShwiFLda3ZCADvJDjV/1xb2gB5CspaVSJElP+K!6Qmp2h4H4PA= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1480 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:589897 |
Show key headers only | View raw
mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or set in motion. a particle is...aware.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400
csiph-web