Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #581613
| Message-ID | <574B9BFC.305E@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-29 18:48 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: How to be a "real" scientist. |
| References | (3 earlier) <dqss0uFe730U1@mid.individual.net> <99270511-bf74-40f4-92f4-8f7340bdea12@googlegroups.com> <5749F99D.937@ix.netcom.com> <ae6c9baf-7b1c-4263-a678-2fa83dd92e43@googlegroups.com> <574A8BE7.4AEE@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > JanPB wrote: > > > > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 1:03:31 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > JanPB wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 11:26:41 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It is legal to criticise whatever you like in physics (or any other > > > > > science). > > > > > > > > > > But your critique will not get very far. Especially inside such > > > > > locked-in communities critique will not be heard, since the insiders > > > > > have no interest in listening to challenging statements from outside. > > > > > > > > No. It doesn't work that way. The reality is that _in fact_ there are no "challenging statements" > > > > in physics (or mathematics) "from the outside" to speak of(*). Physics and mathematics have > > > > evolved to the point where a significant amount of time and honest work is required to even > > > > understand the subject fully, let alone contribute to it. > > > > > > > > So the people "inside" can tell right away that such "challenges" are worthless but the > > > > "challengers" cannot understand why. Instead, they claim some weird "conspiracies" and > > > > vent on the Internet. > > > > > > > > (*) except philosophical > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jan > > > > > > That is complete garbage! > > > > > > > > > Real physics comes from...'understanding' without the mathematics. > > > > Without understanding the mathematics you have no understanding of physics. > > > > -- > > Jan > > I understand... > 'this thing of yours'.. > this invention yous > call...Math, > > is just another > language yous > invented. > > But, you're under > an illusion that it's real. > > You are sooo close > to the math trees, that > you have to climb > mountains and bigger > moutains in order to > see the math forest. > > You're in a mandelbrot. > http://guciek.github.io/web_mandelbrot.html > > The more you click > the deeper you fall in > the more complicated it > gets...you become, > infected. yous math people have created...too many trees. Those trees need to be ...cut down.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How to be a "real" scientist. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-28 23:27 -0700 Re: How to be a "real" scientist. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 18:48 -0700 Re: How to be a "real" scientist. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:57 -0700
csiph-web