Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #551131

Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 07 Feb 2016 18:16:22 -0600
Message-ID <56B7DE57.67B4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2016 16:16:23 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.astro
Subject Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?
References <dPqdnSyaPpEcxjDLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com> <n8om4s$gp6$1@dont-email.me> <rLOdnXy-3tZHZjLLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56B056FB.522D@ix.netcom.com> <56B142DA.1ECD@ix.netcom.com> <n8vdbu$1qir$1@gioia.aioe.org> <56B3A803.229B@ix.netcom.com> <n914ar$g13$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B42852.31BE@ix.netcom.com> <56B5BAD2.29AC@ix.netcom.com> <n95egv$51f$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B65D2D.7A0C@ix.netcom.com> <n966jo$akb$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B7BCFB.6148@ix.netcom.com> <56B7CF09.284@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 83
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-srEVRAyi4ytmSlwtbgpCpfulA+EY+DIFVIbL86rwcyzmyblXQAZhEQBjWHcuOOSacHHnTeidGFC9t04!hUbqAYgmZlxlhfpjFKXDa/nYfb3Rtlc7TfX+HwJ0c6BRCfJ3CAEyVDTLwEe+b4/HWIOhpPwAUR4I!qWneTQyg4A==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 5040
Xref csiph.com alt.astronomy:281775 sci.physics:551131 sci.physics.relativity:375767 rec.arts.sf.written:432895 sci.astro:57728

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > >
> > > >Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Babbling nonsense.  Read up on the water cycle.  Water drawn up in plants
> > > >> (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component
> > > >> of the water cycle.
> > >
> > > >What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about
> > > >the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."?
> > >
> > > Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the
> > > sun) is a minor component.  The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and
> > > "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle.
> > > The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water
> > > cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by
> > > using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water
> > > from the ocean (and is affected by tides).
> >
> > I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'.
> >
> > That means you don't know much...
> > https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws
> >
> > Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) ..
> >
> > this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the
> > ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions
> > of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean.
> >
> > In other words...
> >
> > the earth's moon makes the ocean.
> >
> > All from a single drop of water on a leaf.
> >
> > http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364C705A437130394F77714B31687A7047493438444F76714E716B673D3D/water-drops-on-leaf.jpg
> >
> > Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees.
> >
> > Do you want me to explain How that works?
> >
> > Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia.
> >
> > Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine:
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
> 
> https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB
> 
> of course Science is a few thousand years behind...
> they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works.
> 
> https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB
> 
> wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees:
>  http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
> 
> man! yous guys are soooo behind the  times.
> 
> yous just don't get it.
> 
> I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years.



what you people 
don't understand...
is that the earth's moon
is instrumental in the 
origin of the ocean
the origin of fishes
the origin of people
the origin of Life on Earth.

Simply by it's gravitational pull on the earth and it's atmosphere.

What came first, the rain or the clouds?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 15:59 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 22:14 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 14:23 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-04 11:40 +0000
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:35 -0800
      Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 03:18 +0000
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 20:42 -0800
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 08:46 +0000
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 15:26 +0000
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 15:39 +0000
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-05 21:48 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:56 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-05 20:07 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:47 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:29 -0500
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 22:31 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 22:50 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-11 19:44 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:41 -0600
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 01:20 -0800
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 18:37 +0000
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 12:53 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 01:28 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 16:16 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-08 21:36 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:37 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0800

csiph-web