Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?

Message-ID	<56B7CF09.284@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.astro, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?
References	(9 earlier) <56B5BAD2.29AC@ix.netcom.com> <n95egv$51f$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B65D2D.7A0C@ix.netcom.com> <n966jo$akb$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B7BCFB.6148@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >
> > >Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >> Babbling nonsense.  Read up on the water cycle.  Water drawn up in plants
> > >> (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component
> > >> of the water cycle.
> >
> > >What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about
> > >the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."?
> >
> > Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the
> > sun) is a minor component.  The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and
> > "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle.
> > The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water
> > cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by
> > using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water
> > from the ocean (and is affected by tides).
> 
> I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'.
> 
> That means you don't know much...
> https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws
> 
> Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) ..
> 
> this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the
> ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions
> of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean.
> 
> In other words...
> 
> the earth's moon makes the ocean.
> 
> All from a single drop of water on a leaf.
> 
> http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364C705A437130394F77714B31687A7047493438444F76714E716B673D3D/water-drops-on-leaf.jpg
> 
> Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees.
> 
> Do you want me to explain How that works?
> 
> Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia.
> 
> Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg



https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB

of course Science is a few thousand years behind...
they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works.

https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB


wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees:
 http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg


man! yous guys are soooo behind the  times.

yous just don't get it.

I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years.

Thread

Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 15:59 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 22:14 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 14:23 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-04 11:40 +0000
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:35 -0800
      Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 03:18 +0000
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 20:42 -0800
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 08:46 +0000
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 15:26 +0000
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 15:39 +0000
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-05 21:48 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:56 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-05 20:07 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:47 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:29 -0500
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 22:31 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 22:50 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-11 19:44 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:41 -0600
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 01:20 -0800
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 18:37 +0000
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 12:53 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 01:28 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 16:16 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-08 21:36 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:37 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0800

csiph-web