Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551108
| Message-ID | <56B7BCFB.6148@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.astro, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? |
| References | (8 earlier) <56B42852.31BE@ix.netcom.com> <56B5BAD2.29AC@ix.netcom.com> <n95egv$51f$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B65D2D.7A0C@ix.netcom.com> <n966jo$akb$1@pcls7.std.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Michael Moroney wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > >Michael Moroney wrote: > > >> Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants > >> (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component > >> of the water cycle. > > >What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about > >the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? > > Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the > sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and > "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. > The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water > cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by > using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water > from the ocean (and is affected by tides). I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. That means you don't know much... https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. In other words... the earth's moon makes the ocean. All from a single drop of water on a leaf. http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364C705A437130394F77714B31687A7047493438444F76714E716B673D3D/water-drops-on-leaf.jpg Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. Do you want me to explain How that works? Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 15:59 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 22:14 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 14:23 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-04 11:40 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 03:18 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 20:42 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 08:46 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 15:26 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 15:39 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-05 21:48 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:56 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-05 20:07 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:47 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:29 -0500
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 22:31 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 22:50 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-11 19:44 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:41 -0600
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 01:20 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 18:37 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 12:53 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 01:28 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 16:16 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-08 21:36 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:37 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0800
csiph-web