Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551121
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 07 Feb 2016 17:11:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <56B7CF09.284@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sun, 07 Feb 2016 15:11:05 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.astro, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? |
| References | <dPqdnSyaPpEcxjDLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com> <n8om4s$gp6$1@dont-email.me> <rLOdnXy-3tZHZjLLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56B056FB.522D@ix.netcom.com> <56B142DA.1ECD@ix.netcom.com> <n8vdbu$1qir$1@gioia.aioe.org> <56B3A803.229B@ix.netcom.com> <n914ar$g13$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B42852.31BE@ix.netcom.com> <56B5BAD2.29AC@ix.netcom.com> <n95egv$51f$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B65D2D.7A0C@ix.netcom.com> <n966jo$akb$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B7BCFB.6148@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 70 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 162.239.141.5 |
| X-Trace | sv3-6mVgUcIYLZpaUrEbnh9TE8Ti1SIyGuKRKphevEIdMZI7rQEu5FC7GyBkbaVaJ8ZYj6wDpsE3T7nyDZV!YCEBm8lf2Jo5D6AHcnJijRPEVs/mQue1UgbFlwuecQ7BO23ex0EVR41XuM7neZ15zLZeUGqlXGl4!jrtqhzlL |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 4506 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.astro:57727 sci.physics:551121 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > > > >Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > >> Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants > > >> (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component > > >> of the water cycle. > > > > >What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about > > >the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? > > > > Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the > > sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and > > "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. > > The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water > > cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by > > using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water > > from the ocean (and is affected by tides). > > I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. > > That means you don't know much... > https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws > > Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. > > this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the > ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions > of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. > > In other words... > > the earth's moon makes the ocean. > > All from a single drop of water on a leaf. > > http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364C705A437130394F77714B31687A7047493438444F76714E716B673D3D/water-drops-on-leaf.jpg > > Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. > > Do you want me to explain How that works? > > Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. > > Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB of course Science is a few thousand years behind... they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works. https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg man! yous guys are soooo behind the times. yous just don't get it. I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 15:59 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 22:14 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 14:23 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-04 11:40 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 03:18 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 20:42 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 08:46 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 15:26 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 15:39 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-05 21:48 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:56 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-05 20:07 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:47 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:29 -0500
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 22:31 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 22:50 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-11 19:44 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:41 -0600
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 01:20 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 18:37 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 12:53 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 01:28 +0000
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 16:16 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-08 21:36 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:37 -0800
Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0800
csiph-web