Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #509703

Re: Earths

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > alber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 7/25/2015 10:59 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >>>>> this is drake's equation N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L
> > > > >>>>>
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You don't have a scientific bone in your body and show yourself to
> > > > >> be an idiot over and over again. The Drake Equation is one of the
> > > > >> simplest concepts in all of science, and yet you apparently don't
> > > > >> have any chance to understand it. I was only trying to help you,
> > > > >> but that is like talking to a mud fence. As far as I am concerned,
> > > > >> you are on your own, and good riddance.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Okay...get ready to commit suicide...(there is a sale of blue razor
> > > > > blades at walmart...hurry.)
> > > > >
> > > > > N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L value of  "ne" is 2 (according to
> > > > > Drake himself, and he was thinking of earth and mars)
> > > > >
> > > > > now, suppose that number is wrong...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > How many planets do you know that are
> > > > >
> > > > > "ecologically suitable for life"????
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lots, they have something like McDonald, and Wall marts, and Air
> > > > Condition places.  Also they must have cars to get around the surface.
> > > > OR swim fins if it is all water.
> > > >   Actually How could I know, I have only been on one.
> > >
> > > Here is how Drake thought:
> > >
> > > "In our own solar system there are several bodies
> > > that may be suitable for life of some sort: the Earth
> > > certainly, and perhaps Mars, Titan and Jupiter. Once
> > > life originates, it tends to be very adaptable and
> > > tenacious. There must be many different environments
> > > suitable for life in a given planetary system. But
> > > conservatively we choose ne=2."
> > >
> > > Now,  Mars, Titan and Jupiter don't have a McDonald's....
> > > so that means ne=2 is incorrect.
> > >
> > > Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!
> >
> > The next Drake random variable is the number
> > ne of ‘‘Earth-type’’ planets in a given star system. Taking
> > example from the Solar System, since only the Earth is
> > truly ‘‘Earth-type’’, the mean value of
> > ne is clearly 1, but the standard deviation is not zero if we assume that Mars
> > also may be regarded as Earth-type. Since there are thus
> > two Earth-type planets in the Solar System, we must
> > assume a standard deviation of 1 =2 Earth and Mars.
> >
> > Now, does anybody here think Mars is "ecologically suitable for life"?
> >
> > Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!
> >
> > Trash.
> 
> I keep seeing the number 2 value for ne
> 
> http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/54a472ad6da81119318b4569-960/drake%20equation%20table.png
> 
> Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!



In other words...The Drake Equation is mathematicaly a fraud. Drake is a fraud.

That also means...the SETI Institute is which was founded and based on The Drake Equation,
the whole entire SETI Institute project is a fraud.

There are no other earths, there are no other life elsewhere in the universe.


There is no reason why there should be.

(and please, no more fradulent reasons...I will not put up with it.)


There are no other earths, there are no other life elsewhere in the universe.


 There is simply
 no Reason
 for Life or other earths to
 exist anywhere
 else in the universe.
 
 No reason whatsoever!
 
 
 Yous cannot even give me one reason...




The Starmaker

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:22 -0700
  Re: Earths "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-23 13:11 -0700
  Re: Earths David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-07-23 18:32 -0500
    Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:46 -0500
    Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:44 -0700
  Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:41 -0500
    Re: Earths pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0700
      Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 20:53 -0500
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:42 -0700
    Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 22:46 -0700
      Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 18:28 -0700
        Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 20:59 -0700
          Re: Earths alber <invelid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-25 23:55 -0500
            Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:37 -0700
              Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:53 -0700
                Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:13 -0700
                Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 13:29 -0700
                Re: Earths gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-26 16:01 -0500
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 12:10 -0700
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-28 23:01 -0700

csiph-web