Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #271341

Re: Earths

Message-ID <55B483FB.1598@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-07-25 23:53 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.math
Subject Re: Earths
References (6 earlier) <55B437AA.749A@ix.netcom.com> <44e760f5-7dea-4ccb-84c4-39661703b762@googlegroups.com> <55B45B2A.694A@ix.netcom.com> <mp1p8k$9rl$2@speranza.aioe.org> <55B48026.7EAE@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> alber wrote:
> >
> > On 7/25/2015 10:59 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > >>>>> this is drake's equation N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L
> > >>>>>
> >
> > >>
> > >> You don't have a scientific bone in your body and show yourself to
> > >> be an idiot over and over again. The Drake Equation is one of the
> > >> simplest concepts in all of science, and yet you apparently don't
> > >> have any chance to understand it. I was only trying to help you,
> > >> but that is like talking to a mud fence. As far as I am concerned,
> > >> you are on your own, and good riddance.
> > >
> >
> > > Okay...get ready to commit suicide...(there is a sale of blue razor
> > > blades at walmart...hurry.)
> > >
> > > N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L value of  "ne" is 2 (according to
> > > Drake himself, and he was thinking of earth and mars)
> > >
> > > now, supose that number is wrong...
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > How many planets do you know that are
> > >
> > > "ecologically suitable for life"????
> > >
> >
> > Lots, they have something like McDonald, and Wall marts, and Air
> > Condition places.  Also they must have cars to get around the surface.
> > OR swim fins if it is all water.
> >   Actually How could I know, I have only been on one.
> 
> Here is how Drake thought:
> 
> "In our own solar system there are several bodies
> that may be suitable for life of some sort: the Earth
> certainly, and perhaps Mars, Titan and Jupiter. Once
> life originates, it tends to be very adaptable and
> tenacious. There must be many different environments
> suitable for life in a given planetary system. But
> conservatively we choose ne=2."
> 
> Now,  Mars, Titan and Jupiter don't have a McDonald's....
> so that means ne=2 is incorrect.
> 
> Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!

The next Drake random variable is the number
ne of ‘‘Earth-type’’ planets in a given star system. Taking
example from the Solar System, since only the Earth is
truly ‘‘Earth-type’’, the mean value of
ne is clearly 1, but the standard deviation is not zero if we assume that Mars
also may be regarded as Earth-type. Since there are thus
two Earth-type planets in the Solar System, we must
assume a standard deviation of 1 =2 Earth and Mars.



Now, does anybody here think Mars is "ecologically suitable for life"?



Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!


Trash.

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:22 -0700
  Re: Earths "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-23 13:11 -0700
  Re: Earths David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-07-23 18:32 -0500
    Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:46 -0500
    Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:44 -0700
  Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:41 -0500
    Re: Earths Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 20:49 -0700
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:42 -0700
    Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 22:46 -0700
      Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 18:28 -0700
        Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 20:59 -0700
          Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:37 -0700
            Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:53 -0700
              Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:13 -0700
                Re: Earths Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 08:50 -0700
                Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 13:29 -0700
                Re: Earths gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-26 16:01 -0500
              Re: Earths Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 08:51 -0700
          Re: Earths Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 08:53 -0700
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 12:10 -0700
    Re: Earths Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 12:42 -0700
  Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-28 23:01 -0700
    Re: Earths 21blackswan@gmail.com - 2015-07-29 07:42 -0700

csiph-web