Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #509534
| Message-ID | <55B4887D.45CC@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 00:13 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Earths |
| References | (7 earlier) <44e760f5-7dea-4ccb-84c4-39661703b762@googlegroups.com> <55B45B2A.694A@ix.netcom.com> <mp1p8k$9rl$2@speranza.aioe.org> <55B48026.7EAE@ix.netcom.com> <55B483FB.1598@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > alber wrote: > > > > > > On 7/25/2015 10:59 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> this is drake's equation N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> You don't have a scientific bone in your body and show yourself to > > > >> be an idiot over and over again. The Drake Equation is one of the > > > >> simplest concepts in all of science, and yet you apparently don't > > > >> have any chance to understand it. I was only trying to help you, > > > >> but that is like talking to a mud fence. As far as I am concerned, > > > >> you are on your own, and good riddance. > > > > > > > > > > > Okay...get ready to commit suicide...(there is a sale of blue razor > > > > blades at walmart...hurry.) > > > > > > > > N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L value of "ne" is 2 (according to > > > > Drake himself, and he was thinking of earth and mars) > > > > > > > > now, supose that number is wrong... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many planets do you know that are > > > > > > > > "ecologically suitable for life"???? > > > > > > > > > > Lots, they have something like McDonald, and Wall marts, and Air > > > Condition places. Also they must have cars to get around the surface. > > > OR swim fins if it is all water. > > > Actually How could I know, I have only been on one. > > > > Here is how Drake thought: > > > > "In our own solar system there are several bodies > > that may be suitable for life of some sort: the Earth > > certainly, and perhaps Mars, Titan and Jupiter. Once > > life originates, it tends to be very adaptable and > > tenacious. There must be many different environments > > suitable for life in a given planetary system. But > > conservatively we choose ne=2." > > > > Now, Mars, Titan and Jupiter don't have a McDonald's.... > > so that means ne=2 is incorrect. > > > > Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage! > > The next Drake random variable is the number > ne of ‘‘Earth-type’’ planets in a given star system. Taking > example from the Solar System, since only the Earth is > truly ‘‘Earth-type’’, the mean value of > ne is clearly 1, but the standard deviation is not zero if we assume that Mars > also may be regarded as Earth-type. Since there are thus > two Earth-type planets in the Solar System, we must > assume a standard deviation of 1 =2 Earth and Mars. > > Now, does anybody here think Mars is "ecologically suitable for life"? > > Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage! > > Trash. I keep seeing the number 2 value for ne http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/54a472ad6da81119318b4569-960/drake%20equation%20table.png Throw The Drake Equation into the garbage can where it belongs. It's garbage!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:22 -0700
Re: Earths "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-23 13:11 -0700
Re: Earths David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-07-23 18:32 -0500
Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:46 -0500
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:44 -0700
Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 19:41 -0500
Re: Earths pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0700
Re: Earths Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 20:53 -0500
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:42 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 22:46 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 18:28 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 20:59 -0700
Re: Earths alber <invelid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:37 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 23:53 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:13 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 13:29 -0700
Re: Earths gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-26 16:01 -0500
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Earths The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-28 23:01 -0700
csiph-web