Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #591523

Re: No Mars travel for Mankind

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: No Mars travel for Mankind
Date 2016-08-01 20:08 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <3011055.QJadu78ljV@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <nnifr902b1t@news4.newsguy.com> <10680556.O9o76ZdvQC@PointedEars.de> <nnlepi07br@news6.newsguy.com> <1897027.irdbgypaU6@PointedEars.de> <861651c1-7e3f-42f2-b958-e436aeb36ed0@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 7:31:21 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> wrote:
>> > Historically and originally, the "far" side was called the
>> > "dark" side because of its completely unknown aspect.
>> You made that up
> 
> I make nothing up:

Whereas “I” would be who, exactly?
 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon

True, but your research method certainly allows for improvement.
 
> "the far side is also referred to as the dark side of the Moon,
> originally in the sense of 'unknown' rather than lack of light"

First of all, Wikipedia is a wiki-based encyclopedia; the key idea is that 
it can be edited by anyone, knowledgable and uninformed people alike.

Second, Wikipedia is not just any wiki; it follows the scientific approach 
(which results in its quality, comparable to that of the online version of 
the “Encyclopædia Britannica” in 2005, according to a “Nature” investigation 
[1]): statements in Wikipedia articles must be properly sourced in order to 
remain.  Obvious nonsense may be removed immediately; dubious statements 
should be, can be, and are in fact challenged.

Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance with 
Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is *immediately 
following that sentence*.

IOW, *maybe* not you, but certainly the person adding that part to the 
article *may* have made it up; until it is substantiated, we cannot know, 
and everyone has every right to remove it from the article or edit it to 
meet Wikipedia standards such as “no theory-finding” and “no original 
research”.  (I might edit it if there is not a reference for the statement 
soon.  Because – I will assume in your favor – you have overlooked or 
disregarded the “[citation needed]” link already, I have added a better 
visible warning on top of that article.)

[1] <http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html>

> Don't forget that it was not until the 1960s that the
> far side was actually observed by human eyes.  Before
> then it was totally hidden and unknown to astronomers
> -- and the science of astronomy goes back a LONG way.

While that is true, for example Johannes Kepler (16th century CE) already 
knew that the far/back side of the Moon was not always dark.  So there was 
no reason to call it the “dark side”, except by people who have no clue what 
they are talking about (whom, in this *scientific* newsgroup, we do not take 
as a measure of correctness).

As you can read *sourced* in

,-<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Appearance_from_Earth>
| 
| […]
| The far side is often inaccurately called the "dark side", but in fact, it 
| is illuminated as often as the near side: once per lunar day, during the 
| new moon phase we observe on Earth when the near side is dark.[118]
| […]
| [118] Phil Plait. "Dark Side of the Moon". Bad Astronomy:Misconceptions. 
|       Retrieved 15 February 2010.

(Notice how the referred source is categorized *by its author*.  I think an 
apology to me by you is in order now.)

Finally, ISTM that, supported by the unsourced statement, you are committing 
a historian’s fallacy here.  Just because there is the term of “dark energy” 
in cosmology *now* (which really refers to “unknown”), there need not have 
been a term of “dark side of the Moon” to mean “unknown side of the Moon”.

HTH

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 10:28 -0500
  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:33 -0700
  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-29 11:13 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:41 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 15:54 -0500
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-05 12:14 -0700
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:57 -0700
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-09 14:23 -0700
  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:24 -0700
  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 12:23 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:54 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-30 15:07 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-30 17:24 -0500
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 18:43 -0400
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-31 12:05 +0200
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 08:59 -0500
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 09:07 -0500
              Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 18:12 +0000
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:47 -0700
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 18:07 +0000
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-01 01:31 +0200
              Re: No Mars travel for Mankind fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 08:46 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 11:02 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-01 15:51 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-01 20:08 +0200
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 13:17 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 00:57 +0200
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-01 23:34 +0000
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 04:39 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 12:49 -0500
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 06:50 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "Eduardo Efftardo" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-08-06 13:27 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 16:49 -0700
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-02 12:13 +0000
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 12:40 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-29 22:19 +0000
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 17:40 -0500
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-29 22:55 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 06:54 -0700
  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 19:20 -0400
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-30 00:22 +0000
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-30 19:09 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-30 23:20 +0000
  No Mars travel for Mankind HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:53 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 18:02 -0400
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 06:44 +0000
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 09:02 -0500

csiph-web