Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #523242
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: What is mass? |
| Followup-To | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2015-09-26 08:35 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2280480.8StNvuNZVT@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <mtuifv$ajn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.09.23.16.59.44@localhost.localdomain> <mtumdt$poa$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2015.09.23.17.33.23@localhost.localdomain> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity
[X-Post sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity;
F'up2 <news:sci.physics.relativity>]
Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:12:18 +0200, Poutnik wrote:
>> cannot be completely wrong equation.
>
> The equation is wrong because it specifies mass, m, as *the* mass,
> i.e. the definitive mass or the one-and-only mass.
There is only mass. To answer the question in the Subject header field
value: Mass is a measure of the energy content of a body at rest in the
laboratory frame (of reference): E = √(pc)² + (mc²)²) → m = E∕c² for p = 0,
with p = γmv (relative rest → γ = 1, v = 0).
That is why we build huge machines to *accelerate* subatomar particles close
to the speed of light in vacuum, and have them collide with each other to
create particles with a lot of mass and, more recently, to "produce" energy
through nuclear fusion.
> Correctly written, the *inertial* mass must be indicated because,
> as already stated, there are two different "kinds" of mass.
Two terms for the same thing is not how science works.
> For some reason, the concepts of inertial mass and gravitational
> mass have been effectively purged from physics,
Because physics is a science. Superfluous terms are not used in science.
One uses different terms for different things, the same term for the same
thing.
> but they are still valid.
Because you say so?
> GR *assumes* the equivalence of both types
Because it can be *demonstrated*. Read on the elevator experiment: Without
additional information, you cannot tell whether you are far away from a
source of gravity or in free fall, and you cannot tell whether you are
accelerating or near a source of gravity.
(Einstein is often described as a theoretical genius only. But, in fact,
the text of his works shows that he was deeply guided by experiment. And
there is other evidence: He co-designed and had built an observatory [the
Einsteinturm in Potsdam, Germany] only for testing GR. And he would have
thrown out GR like yesterday’s newspaper if it had given the wrong result
for the precession of the perihelion of Mercury. Just as he wrote [in
German] “then away with the cosmological term” regarding his field equations
when Hubble’s observations confirmed Lemaître’s theory that the universe was
in fact not static, but expanding.)
> and perhaps for this reason all textbooks incorrectly mention only a
> single type of mass. But, as also mentioned, GR is not yet universally
> established.
In crackpot’s heads, perhaps. Everywhere else it is, quite literally,
“universally” established, for example:
- in timekeeping (precise clocks are gauged based on their elevation; it can
be demonstrated that those at higher elevation tick faster than their
same-model counterparts at lower elevation)
- in communication (with orbital spacecraft and interplanetary probes);
* as a special case, in satellite navigation (GPS and alternatives)
(again, clocks close to a massive body tick slower than those farther away
from it)
- in astronomy and astrophysics (perihelion precession, gravitational
lensing, black holes)
- in cosmology (the ΛCDM, or *standard* model of cosmology)
PointedEars
--
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
testing your knowledge means everything.”
—Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is mass? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-09-23 11:02 -0500
Re: What is mass? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 18:55 +0200
Re: What is mass? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-23 16:59 +0000
Re: What is mass? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 19:12 +0200
Re: What is mass? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 19:17 +0200
Re: What is mass? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-23 17:34 +0000
Re: What is mass? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 20:35 +0200
Re: What is mass? omnilobe@gmail.com - 2015-09-23 12:40 -0700
Re: What is mass? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-23 21:44 +0000
Re: What is mass? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 08:50 +0200
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 22:34 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-26 08:35 +0200
Re: What is mass? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-26 12:35 +0000
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-26 15:37 +0200
Re: What is mass? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 07:14 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-26 16:17 +0200
a-hem; m = F/a is also gOOd noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:16 -0700
Re: a-hem; m = F/a is also gOOd Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-27 03:26 +0200
top-posting is frpowned upon by certain advertizers ... just don't ask them, why not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:53 -0700
What is mass (was: top-posting is frpowned upon by certain advertizers ... just don't ask them, why not) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-28 17:05 +0200
a.k.a photonics -- thanks for the tip (pi dollars is gOOd noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 11:28 -0700
Re: a.k.a photonics -- thanks for the tip (pi dollars is gOOd Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 21:01 +0200
no skwares in the medium of space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 19:29 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 23:07 -0700
Re: What is mass? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 14:01 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 23:40 -0700
Re: What is mass? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 13:36 -0700
Re: What is mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 02:13 -0400
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 09:27 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 04:31 +0200
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 00:29 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 13:21 +0200
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 13:34 +0200
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 05:19 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 05:40 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 15:11 +0200
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 06:37 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 16:22 +0200
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 07:51 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 18:45 +0200
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 11:06 -0700
Re: What is mass? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-29 21:00 +0200
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 13:47 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Ma Hipple" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-30 07:20 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Alan Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-29 07:33 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 02:21 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:11 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 00:39 -0700
Re: What is mass? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 18:38 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 18:50 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Eric Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-05 20:01 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 20:49 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 03:18 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Fred Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-06 17:41 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 19:38 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Greg Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-07 06:59 -0700
Re: What is mass? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-07 09:03 -0500
Re: What is mass? "Hank Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-07 07:20 -0700
Re: What is mass? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 08:11 -0700
Re: What is mass? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:07 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 00:18 -0700
Re: What is mass? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 06:15 -0700
Re: What is mass? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 01:11 -0700
Re: What is mass? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:43 -0700
Re: What is mass? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 12:34 -0700
csiph-web