Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #460339 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-04 16:31 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-05 08:43 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 565 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-04 16:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-05 00:16 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 08:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 13:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 22:32 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 02:48 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 06:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 05:48 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 14:19 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:24 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:00 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 11:04 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 15:25 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 14:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 08:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-05 12:05 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 14:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-05 19:10 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 05:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 12:45 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 06:08 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 14:00 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 14:07 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-06 17:22 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 21:34 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 07:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 13:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 21:27 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 08:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 12:45 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 06:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 14:30 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-06 14:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 21:38 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 07:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 16:08 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 10:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:51 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 13:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 06:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 13:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 06:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:46 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 16:50 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zandra Sobczak <acako@raswa.bo> - 2018-06-08 16:56 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 14:21 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 22:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-09 05:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 13:47 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-09 08:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:39 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 06:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:46 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 07:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:59 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 09:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:18 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-11 04:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 05:01 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-10 14:04 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:19 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-11 08:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 08:48 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:36 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-12 08:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-12 12:26 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 10:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-12 12:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 12:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-13 11:11 -0500
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-12 17:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 22:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 04:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 14:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 08:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 16:13 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-13 07:14 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 08:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-13 12:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 13:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Pasquale Broman <lqs@basq.ce> - 2018-06-13 20:43 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 13:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Pasquale Broman <lqs@basq.ce> - 2018-06-13 21:26 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-14 13:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 13:45 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-14 18:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 14:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 08:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 15:45 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 18:28 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-14 19:15 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 22:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 04:30 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 05:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 05:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 19:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 19:16 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:43 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 05:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-14 11:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-15 13:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 15:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-16 05:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 07:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-16 13:18 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-16 17:08 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:34 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 02:08 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 06:36 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-17 15:44 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 09:04 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-17 18:16 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 13:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-17 16:46 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-17 14:23 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 09:11 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-06-18 09:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 17:26 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 17:59 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-18 14:04 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 18:09 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 14:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 22:43 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-18 22:47 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 08:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 16:10 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-20 12:12 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 13:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-20 17:18 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 14:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 10:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:43 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:48 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 05:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 09:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 09:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-17 17:21 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 07:30 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-17 14:40 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 11:39 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-18 09:08 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 15:49 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 09:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:14 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 13:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-17 22:23 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 06:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 15:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 08:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-18 17:39 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 17:59 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 11:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 12:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 20:48 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 07:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 14:26 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 13:09 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:08 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-20 18:14 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 15:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 11:29 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 10:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 14:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:30 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:36 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 06:23 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 06:47 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 07:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 12:20 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 04:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 06:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 21:25 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-23 04:42 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 05:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:20 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 22:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:11 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 14:34 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 22:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 22:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 02:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 10:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 10:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 00:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 01:19 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 06:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 07:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 06:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 13:56 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 07:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:07 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 08:04 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 09:07 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:47 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 08:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:24 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 08:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 16:07 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 11:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 11:30 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 15:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 22:55 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 16:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 06:45 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-03 14:55 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 14:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-03 21:37 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-07 15:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 15:32 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 14:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 17:45 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 20:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-04 06:20 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-04 09:30 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 06:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 09:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 15:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-05 14:21 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 12:06 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-05 15:31 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 16:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-05 21:07 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-07 09:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-07 17:33 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:41 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-06 14:21 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 00:51 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-07 17:41 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 06:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 06:54 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 07:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 08:25 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 08:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 09:34 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 22:06 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 17:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 17:36 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 15:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 15:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 05:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 05:24 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 02:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 15:06 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 09:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 17:39 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 12:20 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 23:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 00:40 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 09:51 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 10:29 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 22:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 23:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 00:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 05:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 00:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 03:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 02:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 07:54 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 07:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:15 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 18:19 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 02:08 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 18:41 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 10:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-05 14:32 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 05:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-06 15:41 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 17:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 02:48 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:46 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 09:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 15:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 15:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 18:36 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 18:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 22:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 00:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 06:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:58 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-22 14:02 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 14:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 08:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 04:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 14:47 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 10:08 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 04:34 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-23 14:55 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 06:48 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 14:47 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-24 17:50 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 06:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 09:14 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 16:28 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 17:59 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-16 13:12 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-17 06:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 13:33 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:53 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-11 12:18 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-12 07:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-12 12:16 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:30 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-10 17:26 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zandra Sobczak <acako@raswa.bo> - 2018-06-10 21:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-10 17:47 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zandra Sobczak <acako@raswa.bo> - 2018-06-10 21:51 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:56 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zandra Sobczak <acako@raswa.bo> - 2018-06-12 18:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-11 06:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-11 10:42 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-11 08:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-11 18:04 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-11 16:15 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-12 01:47 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-12 06:07 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-12 15:10 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-12 07:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-12 18:20 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 13:37 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-11 12:37 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-12 08:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-12 12:19 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 09:44 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 05:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-12 12:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 13:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 18:39 -0700
OT: programming languages in physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-13 12:07 -0500
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 15:33 -0700
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-14 11:24 -0500
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocowak.br> - 2018-06-14 16:47 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-14 22:02 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-14 20:43 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-14 23:18 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-14 22:11 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-15 00:32 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-15 14:40 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:51 -0700
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-16 12:40 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-16 13:44 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 11:48 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-16 13:52 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-16 15:59 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-16 14:10 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-16 13:00 -0400
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-16 17:22 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-17 03:31 +0200
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Werner Ballard <db@ocoak.bn> - 2018-06-17 11:41 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-18 09:05 -0400
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-18 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: programming languages in physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:24 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:55 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 09:51 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-18 19:25 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-18 11:19 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 11:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-18 22:33 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 07:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-20 12:03 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 13:16 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-20 17:42 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 11:16 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-22 10:50 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 02:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zprávn Udoucih <zpnvn@nwinst.ce> - 2018-06-22 11:36 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-22 13:57 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 08:25 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-22 22:56 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:10 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-06-23 17:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-24 18:19 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-24 12:09 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-25 19:22 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-25 11:27 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-25 21:48 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 06:08 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-27 20:40 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 06:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 14:13 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 01:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 06:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 08:11 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 09:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 09:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 13:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 14:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 06:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 06:41 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 23:21 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 19:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-01 03:42 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-01 07:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-01 15:19 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 13:34 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-01 10:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 19:41 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-01 15:24 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-30 16:39 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-30 17:16 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 16:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-07-02 18:46 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 10:24 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 18:04 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-07-03 20:46 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-06-25 19:40 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 05:09 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 16:10 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 13:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:39 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:55 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-20 18:25 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 12:19 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:54 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 09:38 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 21:02 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 06:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 07:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 08:49 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 08:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 16:12 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 05:35 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 14:33 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 16:55 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:35 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:17 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-24 07:36 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-25 11:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 20:44 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 06:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 14:29 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 17:32 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 00:45 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 17:46 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 01:38 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-27 07:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:40 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 07:15 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 14:31 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 08:23 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 16:09 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:07 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 19:48 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 07:04 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 16:02 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 14:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 21:56 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 15:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 06:18 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 06:28 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 16:31 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 13:28 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:52 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-03 15:01 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 22:11 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-03 22:23 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 09:20 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-05 15:47 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 09:33 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 16:51 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 09:58 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-29 13:57 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 21:56 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 06:12 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 17:10 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 06:15 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:08 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-01 03:44 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 13:34 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-01 09:54 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-01 17:03 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 18:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 19:41 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-07-01 14:48 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:24 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 10:42 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 14:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 14:05 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 16:10 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 10:34 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:19 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-22 07:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-20 18:31 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 12:19 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 12:49 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:54 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 12:00 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-20 13:50 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 14:02 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 10:20 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-21 14:17 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:37 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:26 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 06:45 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-10 19:22 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 13:44 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:30 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-07 11:09 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 09:44 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Zandra Sobczak <acako@raswa.bo> - 2018-06-07 16:49 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-07 13:23 -0400
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 06:59 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-08 18:40 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 13:26 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:36 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-09 05:45 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:22 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-10 06:22 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-06 18:01 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 05:51 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-05 08:43 -0700
Page 24 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 29 Next page →
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 11:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5ac156e-74e4-4164-ab3d-066a08b2684c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461922 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:56:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 12:10:19 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 5:27:14 PM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > >>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> If gravity is strictly attractive, what is stopping the body go all the > >>>>> way to the center of the orbit? The answer: centrifugal force. > >>>> > >>>> [replacement for a deleted post where I made an extremely silly typo] > >>>> > >>>> Centrifugal force does not exist when you describe a system in an inertial > >>>> (non-rotating) frame of reference. > >>> > >>> Assertion is not a valid argument. Centrifugal force exists. There are > >>> countless applications using CF force...eg: centrifuges to separate > >>> material of different densities, gas centrifuges to separate different > >>> isotopes to make atomic bombs. > >> > >> This has been explained to you many times. If you read design articles > >> about centrifuges you would see that they fully attribute the operation of > >> those devices to CENTRIPETAL accelerations and forces, not centrifugal. I > >> know your common sense, everyday experience says they are based on > >> centrifugal force. That common sense is wrong, and to correake ct that error > >> requires that you educate yourself by reading and to stop relying on your > >> common sense for everything. > > > > > > Repeating nonsense does not make it true. > > Ken, if you’re going to claim that all of the basic physics textbooks in > the world are repeating nonsense, and that you (someone completely > uneducated in physics) know the truth based on your common experience, then > you shouldn’t be surprised if the only reaction you get is laughter. I am saying that the assertion that the CF force and acceleration is not real is completely bogus.....it doesn’t matter if it say so in text books. > > > CP acceleration does not make the amusement rides work.....it is the ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 21:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgh3pl$1bun$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462049 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:56:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 12:10:19 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 5:27:14 PM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If gravity is strictly attractive, what is stopping the body go all the >>>>>>> way to the center of the orbit? The answer: centrifugal force. >>>>>> >>>>>> [replacement for a deleted post where I made an extremely silly typo] >>>>>> >>>>>> Centrifugal force does not exist when you describe a system in an inertial >>>>>> (non-rotating) frame of reference. >>>>> >>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument. Centrifugal force exists. There are >>>>> countless applications using CF force...eg: centrifuges to separate >>>>> material of different densities, gas centrifuges to separate different >>>>> isotopes to make atomic bombs. >>>> >>>> This has been explained to you many times. If you read design articles >>>> about centrifuges you would see that they fully attribute the operation of >>>> those devices to CENTRIPETAL accelerations and forces, not centrifugal. I >>>> know your common sense, everyday experience says they are based on >>>> centrifugal force. That common sense is wrong, and to correake ct that error >>>> requires that you educate yourself by reading and to stop relying on your >>>> common sense for everything. >>> >>> >>> Repeating nonsense does not make it true. >> >> Ken, if you’re going to claim that all of the basic physics textbooks in >> the world are repeating nonsense, and that you (someone completely >> uneducated in physics) know the truth based on your common experience, then >> you shouldn’t be surprised if the only reaction you get is laughter. > > I am saying that the assertion that the CF force and acceleration is not > real is completely bogus.....it doesn’t matter if it say so in text books. Yes it does matter. If you are the only person on the planet who believes that centrifugal force is real AND if you are the one uneducated in physics AND if every physics book on the planet says centrifugal force is fictional, then you are the one that is out of luck and out to lunch. It is STUPID for a person uneducated in physics to declare that basic physics is wrong. > > >> >>> CP acceleration does not make the amusement rides work.....it is the ... > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-22 06:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <21347280-7e5b-435c-85c3-ae6138e98e5f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462075 |
On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 5:02:49 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:56:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 12:10:19 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 5:27:14 PM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > >>>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If gravity is strictly attractive, what is stopping the body go all the > >>>>>>> way to the center of the orbit? The answer: centrifugal force. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [replacement for a deleted post where I made an extremely silly typo] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Centrifugal force does not exist when you describe a system in an inertial > >>>>>> (non-rotating) frame of reference. > >>>>> > >>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument. Centrifugal force exists. There are > >>>>> countless applications using CF force...eg: centrifuges to separate > >>>>> material of different densities, gas centrifuges to separate different > >>>>> isotopes to make atomic bombs. > >>>> > >>>> This has been explained to you many times. If you read design articles > >>>> about centrifuges you would see that they fully attribute the operation of > >>>> those devices to CENTRIPETAL accelerations and forces, not centrifugal. I > >>>> know your common sense, everyday experience says they are based on > >>>> centrifugal force. That common sense is wrong, and to correake ct that error > >>>> requires that you educate yourself by reading and to stop relying on your > >>>> common sense for everything. > >>> > >>> > >>> Repeating nonsense does not make it true. > >> > >> Ken, if you’re going to claim that all of the basic physics textbooks in > >> the world are repeating nonsense, and that you (someone completely > >> uneducated in physics) know the truth based on your common experience, then > >> you shouldn’t be surprised if the only reaction you get is laughter. > > > > I am saying that the assertion that the CF force and acceleration is not > > real is completely bogus.....it doesn’t matter if it say so in text books. > > Yes it does matter. If you are the only person on the planet who believes > that centrifugal force is real AND if you are the one uneducated in physics > AND if every physics book on the planet says centrifugal force is > fictional, then you are the one that is out of luck and out to lunch. Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > > It is STUPID for a person uneducated in physics to declare that basic > physics is wrong. > > > > > > >> > >>> CP acceleration does not make the amusement rides work.....it is the ... > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-22 07:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7f17070c-9c86-4cb7-9fcd-f3047ec879e1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462167 |
On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the textbooks say so--is not acceptable. If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping an object straight down. https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't have it already. https://java.com/en/download/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-22 08:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <30c40628-67d6-4019-9039-7b766ce33a37@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462176 |
On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 10:53:43 AM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > > > Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > > If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > an object straight down. > > https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html See my answer to Paul’s demo in my post at 11:25 AM. > > You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > have it already. > https://java.com/en/download/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-22 08:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e3f371e-b4db-4af6-95fb-0b51c950a2c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462185 |
On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 10:49:28 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 10:53:43 AM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > > > > > Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > > > > If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > > DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > > an object straight down. > > > > https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > > See my answer to Paul’s demo in my post at 11:25 AM. Your numbers don't work out and you've screwed up your units. Try again. > > You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > > have it already. > > https://java.com/en/download/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-22 16:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgj74f$o22$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462176 |
Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > > If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > an object straight down. > > https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > > You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > have it already. > https://java.com/en/download/ > And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all erroneous illusions. 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD on you. 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel heavier as though gravity downward has increased. In fact you are not heavier at all. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting an increase of a force UPWARD exerted in your feet. 4. When you are in a roller coaster and go over the top of a hill, you briefly feel lighter as though gravity has decreased. In fact you are not lighter at all. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a decrease of a force UPWARD on your posterior. 5. When astronauts are on the Space Station, they feel weightless as though there is no gravity at all. In fact, the force of gravity on the astronauts is 95% of what it is on the surface of the earth. It is their minds mistakenly misinterpreting a lack of customary forces UPWARD on their feet if standing or on their posteriors if sitting. As I said, common sense and sensory experience is WRONG in accounting for what’s going on. Furthermore, by reading books, you would learn in their explanations WHY these common sensations are wrong and what the correct physical accounting is. You choose not to read and instead to believe your mistaken sensory impressions. That is NOT a good way to do physics or to think like a physicist. Common experience sometimes is right, but it is also often wrong. Common experience is not a reliable indicator of physical truth. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-23 05:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f76ee6d1-4296-45d7-9df4-66b76ae94c82@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462193 |
On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > > > >> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is > >> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP > >> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the > >> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > > > > If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > > DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > > an object straight down. > > > > https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > > > > You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > > have it already. > > https://java.com/en/download/ > > > > And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously > don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal > force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other > examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to > read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all > erroneous illusions. Moron, what I feel is real. Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > > 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your > seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your > mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force pushing me forward > > 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force > pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the > right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on > your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is stopping me go further. > > 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel > heavier as though gravity downward has increa... Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-23 14:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgllo7$g9t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462319 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>> >>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. >>> >>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" >>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping >>> an object straight down. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html >>> >>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't >>> have it already. >>> https://java.com/en/download/ >>> >> >> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously >> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal >> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other >> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to >> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all >> erroneous illusions. > > Moron, what I feel is real. Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it when you do that. > Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > >> >> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your >> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your >> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. > > Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force > pushing me forward >> >> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force >> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the >> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on >> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. > > Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is stopping me go further. > >> >> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel >> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... > > Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF > motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-23 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <93136619-5fb1-4a5d-8784-a6854997551a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462346 |
On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is > >>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP > >>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the > >>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > >>> > >>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > >>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > >>> an object straight down. > >>> > >>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > >>> > >>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > >>> have it already. > >>> https://java.com/en/download/ > >>> > >> > >> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously > >> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal > >> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other > >> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to > >> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all > >> erroneous illusions. > > > > Moron, what I feel is real. > > Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the > planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it > when you do that. Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. > > > Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > > > >> > >> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your > >> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your > >> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. > > > > Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force > > pushing me forward > >> > >> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force > >> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the > >> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on > >> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. > > > > Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is stopping me go further. > > > >> > >> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel > >> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... > > > > Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF > > motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-24 00:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgmp10$740$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #462409 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> > Moron, what I feel is real. >> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the >> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it >> when you do that. >Moron and uneducated woodworker, So Stupid Ken, how does it feel to be stupider than a "moron and uneducated woodworker" ? (sorry, Odd, you are obviously neither of those) That's why you're called Stupid Ken, Stupid Ken.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-24 13:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgo5m0$54n$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462409 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. >>>>> >>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" >>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping >>>>> an object straight down. >>>>> >>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html >>>>> >>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't >>>>> have it already. >>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously >>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal >>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other >>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to >>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all >>>> erroneous illusions. >>> >>> Moron, what I feel is real. >> >> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the >> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it >> when you do that. > > Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims > it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. > > >> >>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. >>> >>>> >>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your >>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your >>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. >>> >>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force >>> pushing me forward >>>> >>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force >>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the >>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on >>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. >>> >>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is >>> stopping me go further. >>> >>>> >>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel >>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... >>> >>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF >>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-24 07:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <34a3cac3-c144-4b1e-ba4c-31c03f96bda7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462447 |
On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is > >>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP > >>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the > >>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > >>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > >>>>> an object straight down. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > >>>>> > >>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > >>>>> have it already. > >>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously > >>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal > >>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other > >>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to > >>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all > >>>> erroneous illusions. > >>> > >>> Moron, what I feel is real. > >> > >> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the > >> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it > >> when you do that. > > > > Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims > > it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. > > And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It > doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re > right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a > character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) is an example of such cult teaching. I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I don’t believe in such cult teaching. 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. > > > > > > >> > >>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your > >>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your > >>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. > >>> > >>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force > >>> pushing me forward > >>>> > >>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force > >>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the > >>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on > >>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. > >>> > >>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is > >>> stopping me go further. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel > >>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... > >>> > >>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF > >>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-24 09:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fd9f4f38-6212-496b-aa3e-b398c21554a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462452 |
On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:36:11 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) is an example of such cult teaching. Over a century ago, Einstein pondered, among other things, the distinction between forces and pseudoforces, and came up with one of the greatest intellectual achievements in physics, the general theory of relativity. You, on the other hand, pondering some of the same puzzles, have achieved nothing better than an incoherent set of speculations that don't deserve to be called a theory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgqsv2$g7t$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462452 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >>>>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >>>>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >>>>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" >>>>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping >>>>>>> an object straight down. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't >>>>>>> have it already. >>>>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously >>>>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal >>>>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other >>>>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to >>>>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all >>>>>> erroneous illusions. >>>>> >>>>> Moron, what I feel is real. >>>> >>>> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the >>>> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it >>>> when you do that. >>> >>> Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims >>> it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. >> >> And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It >> doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re >> right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a >> character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. > > No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult > member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot > be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) > is an example of such cult teaching. > > I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: > 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. > 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF > force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different > densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. > 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I > don’t believe in such cult teaching. > 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal > force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. > So, Ken, you say that because you are a thinking human being with sensory experience, you have no need to learn even basics physics, even if the conclusions you draw from your thinking and experience are dead wrong. And you say that it doesn’t matter at all what the designers of centrifuges say the principle of operation of centrifuges is, if your dim memory says otherwise, then you’d rather believe yourself than the designers. And you say that if you ask questions about any of this on Usenet, then experts are obligated to explain themselves to you until you are convinced. Are you nuts??? > >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your >>>>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your >>>>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. >>>>> >>>>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force >>>>> pushing me forward >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force >>>>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the >>>>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on >>>>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. >>>>> >>>>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is >>>>> stopping me go further. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel >>>>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... >>>>> >>>>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF >>>>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-25 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <83febe24-f441-47f9-abd7-0fa838195f7b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462558 |
On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 10:07:35 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is > >>>>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP > >>>>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the > >>>>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > >>>>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > >>>>>>> an object straight down. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > >>>>>>> have it already. > >>>>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously > >>>>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal > >>>>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other > >>>>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to > >>>>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all > >>>>>> erroneous illusions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron, what I feel is real. > >>>> > >>>> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the > >>>> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it > >>>> when you do that. > >>> > >>> Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims > >>> it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. > >> > >> And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It > >> doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re > >> right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a > >> character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. > > > > No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult > > member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot > > be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) > > is an example of such cult teaching. > > > > I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: > > 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. > > 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF > > force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different > > densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. > > 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I > > don’t believe in such cult teaching. > > 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal > > force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. > > > > So, Ken, you say that because you are a thinking human being with sensory > experience, you have no need to learn even basics physics, even if the > conclusions you draw from your thinking and experience are dead wrong. Moron, my experiences are not wrong. When I am on a Merry-go-Round it is trying to throw me of it and I do feel the centrifugal motion. It is you and your SR fanatics who failed to understand the fundamental of physics. Also you failed to remember that if your theory contradicts observations or experience then your theory is a failed theory.....time to go back to the drawing board. >And > you say that it doesn’t matter at all what the designers of centrifuges say > the principle of operation of centrifuges is, if your dim memory says > otherwise, then you’d rather believe yourself than the designers. And you > say that if you ask questions about any of this on Usenet, then experts are > obligated to explain themselves to you until you are convinced. > > Are you nuts??? > > > > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your > >>>>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your > >>>>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force > >>>>> pushing me forward > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force > >>>>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the > >>>>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on > >>>>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is > >>>>> stopping me go further. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel > >>>>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF > >>>>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-25 20:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgrk6q$1prk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462602 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 10:07:35 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >>>>>>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >>>>>>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >>>>>>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" >>>>>>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping >>>>>>>>> an object straight down. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't >>>>>>>>> have it already. >>>>>>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously >>>>>>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal >>>>>>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other >>>>>>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to >>>>>>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all >>>>>>>> erroneous illusions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron, what I feel is real. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the >>>>>> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it >>>>>> when you do that. >>>>> >>>>> Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims >>>>> it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. >>>> >>>> And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It >>>> doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re >>>> right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a >>>> character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. >>> >>> No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult >>> member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot >>> be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) >>> is an example of such cult teaching. >>> >>> I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: >>> 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. >>> 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF >>> force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different >>> densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. >>> 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I >>> don’t believe in such cult teaching. >>> 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal >>> force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. >>> >> >> So, Ken, you say that because you are a thinking human being with sensory >> experience, you have no need to learn even basics physics, even if the >> conclusions you draw from your thinking and experience are dead wrong. > > Moron, my experiences are not wrong. Yes they ARE. This is SPECIFICALLY why these examples are called out in textbooks, as I mentioned. Because the way people describe their sensations is WRONG and does not match the real explanation. Deny these hundreds of textbooks until the day you die. Insist that your experience is right until the day you die. You are all alone, claiming that the books are all wrong about these simple explanations. > When I am on a Merry-go-Round it is trying to throw me of it and I do > feel the centrifugal motion. It is you and your SR fanatics who failed to > understand the fundamental of physics. Also you failed to remember that > if your theory contradicts observations or experience There is NOTHING in science that says if a theory runs counter to everyday experience then it is wrong. > then your theory is a failed theory.....time to go back to the drawing board. > >> And >> you say that it doesn’t matter at all what the designers of centrifuges say >> the principle of operation of centrifuges is, if your dim memory says >> otherwise, then you’d rather believe yourself than the designers. And you >> say that if you ask questions about any of this on Usenet, then experts are >> obligated to explain themselves to you until you are convinced. >> >> Are you nuts??? >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your >>>>>>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your >>>>>>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force >>>>>>> pushing me forward >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force >>>>>>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the >>>>>>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on >>>>>>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is >>>>>>> stopping me go further. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel >>>>>>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF >>>>>>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-26 06:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <caf0cbad-00b2-4f30-a2fd-c529e19575cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #462616 |
On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 4:44:44 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 10:07:35 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is > >>>>>>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP > >>>>>>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the > >>>>>>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" > >>>>>>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping > >>>>>>>>> an object straight down. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't > >>>>>>>>> have it already. > >>>>>>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously > >>>>>>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal > >>>>>>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other > >>>>>>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to > >>>>>>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all > >>>>>>>> erroneous illusions. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Moron, what I feel is real. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the > >>>>>> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it > >>>>>> when you do that. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims > >>>>> it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. > >>>> > >>>> And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It > >>>> doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re > >>>> right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a > >>>> character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. > >>> > >>> No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult > >>> member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot > >>> be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) > >>> is an example of such cult teaching. > >>> > >>> I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: > >>> 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. > >>> 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF > >>> force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different > >>> densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. > >>> 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I > >>> don’t believe in such cult teaching. > >>> 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal > >>> force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. > >>> > >> > >> So, Ken, you say that because you are a thinking human being with sensory > >> experience, you have no need to learn even basics physics, even if the > >> conclusions you draw from your thinking and experience are dead wrong. > > > > Moron, my experiences are not wrong. > > Yes they ARE. This is SPECIFICALLY why these examples are called out in > textbooks, as I mentioned. Because the way people describe their sensations > is WRONG and does not match the real explanation. > > Deny these hundreds of textbooks until the day you die. Insist that your > experience is right until the day you die. You are all alone, claiming that > the books are all wrong about these simple explanations. > > > When I am on a Merry-go-Round it is trying to throw me of it and I do > > feel the centrifugal motion. It is you and your SR fanatics who failed to > > understand the fundamental of physics. Also you failed to remember that > > if your theory contradicts observations or experience > > There is NOTHING in science that says if a theory runs counter to everyday > experience then it is wrong. The assertion that there is no CF force not only runs counter to everyday experience. It also runs against actual experiments. > > > then your theory is a failed theory.....time to go back to the drawing board. > > > >> And > >> you say that it doesn’t matter at all what the designers of centrifuges say > >> the principle of operation of centrifuges is, if your dim memory says > >> otherwise, then you’d rather believe yourself than the designers. And you > >> say that if you ask questions about any of this on Usenet, then experts are > >> obligated to explain themselves to you until you are convinced. > >> > >> Are you nuts??? > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your > >>>>>>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your > >>>>>>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force > >>>>>>> pushing me forward > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force > >>>>>>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the > >>>>>>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on > >>>>>>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is > >>>>>>> stopping me go further. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel > >>>>>>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF > >>>>>>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-26 13:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgtfje$2b9$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #462667 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 4:44:44 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> > When I am on a Merry-go-Round it is trying to throw me of it and I do >> > feel the centrifugal motion. It is you and your SR fanatics who failed to >> > understand the fundamental of physics. Also you failed to remember that >> > if your theory contradicts observations or experience >> There is NOTHING in science that says if a theory runs counter to everyday >> experience then it is wrong. >The assertion that there is no CF force not only runs counter to >everyday experience. It also runs against actual experiments. No, Stupid Ken. Actual experiments show that there is no centrifugal force in inertial or nearly inertial frames. It is a pseudoforce that only appears in non-inertial rotating frames. For example, the frame that rotates once a month with the moon stationary (well wandering around somewhat due to its non-circular orbit). In this non-inertial rotating frame, there must be a centrifugal pseudoforce to counter gravity to keep the moon stationary. Same as in a rotating centrifuge (VERY noninertial). There is a strong centrifugal pseudoforce pulling the matter outward to separate it and keep it stationary (IN THAT NONINERTIAL FRAME). Or your merry-go-round with a ball on the floor. In the rotating frame there is a centrifugal pseudoforce pulling the ball outward. Someone watching outside will see the ball move in a straight line with no force (Newton's First Law).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-26 14:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pgtijt$pk8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #462667 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 4:44:44 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 10:07:35 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 9:17:56 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 10:33:47 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:12:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 8:59:37 AM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey moron, why the CF force is not real when I can feel it? BTW what is >>>>>>>>>>>> the reason for claiming that the CF force is not real and only the CP >>>>>>>>>>>> force is real. BTW your fanatical religious explanation--that the >>>>>>>>>>>> textbooks say so--is not acceptable. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you take a look at Paul's demo, you will see that "centrifugal force" >>>>>>>>>>> DOES NOT BEHAVE AT ALL LIKE A TRUE FORCE in directions other than dropping >>>>>>>>>>> an object straight down. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://paulba.no/Spaceship.html >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You may need to install the Java Runtime on your computer, if you don't >>>>>>>>>>> have it already. >>>>>>>>>>> https://java.com/en/download/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And Ken, in plainer language that doesn’t involve skills you obviously >>>>>>>>>> don’t have, the main lesson is that when you say you feel the centrifugal >>>>>>>>>> force, that is in fact a trick of the mind and is wrong. This and other >>>>>>>>>> examples are discussed in the basic textbooks that you have chosen not to >>>>>>>>>> read. Here are similar examples, all discussed in basic books, and all >>>>>>>>>> erroneous illusions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Moron, what I feel is real. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well just keep telling yourself that and keep saying every book in the >>>>>>>> planet is wrong if it disagrees with your personal common sense. I love it >>>>>>>> when you do that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron and uneducated woodworker, no matter what book or who claims >>>>>>> it.....the idea that there is no CF acceleration is completely wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> And that, Ken, is why you have lost the ability to think and to learn. It >>>>>> doesn’t matter to you if the entire world says you’re wrong, you say you’re >>>>>> right. You cannot EVER accept the idea you might just be mistaken. It’s a >>>>>> character flaw, and a deep and crippling one. >>>>> >>>>> No moron, current physics is liken a cult and ODD is a devoted cult >>>>> member. What the teachings of the cult are the absolute truth and cannot >>>>> be challenged. There is no centrifugal force (centrifugal acceleration) >>>>> is an example of such cult teaching. >>>>> >>>>> I refuse to accept such cult teachings because: >>>>> 1. I can feel the CF force every time I take a ride in the amusement park. >>>>> 2. There are thousands of applications using the concept of CF >>>>> force.....for example: centrifuges to separate material of different >>>>> densities, gas centrifuges to separate U 235 from U 238....etc. >>>>> 3. I am a rational human being....not a physics cult member. Therefore, I >>>>> don’t believe in such cult teaching. >>>>> 4. I asked cult member ODD to explain why that there is no centrifugal >>>>> force (acceleration)....no explanation was provided. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So, Ken, you say that because you are a thinking human being with sensory >>>> experience, you have no need to learn even basics physics, even if the >>>> conclusions you draw from your thinking and experience are dead wrong. >>> >>> Moron, my experiences are not wrong. >> >> Yes they ARE. This is SPECIFICALLY why these examples are called out in >> textbooks, as I mentioned. Because the way people describe their sensations >> is WRONG and does not match the real explanation. >> >> Deny these hundreds of textbooks until the day you die. Insist that your >> experience is right until the day you die. You are all alone, claiming that >> the books are all wrong about these simple explanations. >> >>> When I am on a Merry-go-Round it is trying to throw me of it and I do >>> feel the centrifugal motion. It is you and your SR fanatics who failed to >>> understand the fundamental of physics. Also you failed to remember that >>> if your theory contradicts observations or experience >> >> There is NOTHING in science that says if a theory runs counter to everyday >> experience then it is wrong. > > The assertion that there is no CF force not only runs counter to everyday > experience. It also runs against actual experiments. No it does not. The only thing that varies is the explanation of what caused the results. Newtonian physics (without CF) explains all the observable results in the experiments you have in mind. As an illustration of this, designers of centrifuges explain their operation completely without invoking centrifugal force. Therefore the assertion that there is no real CF is NOT counter to the operational principles, as the explanation does not require it. > >> >>> then your theory is a failed theory.....time to go back to the drawing board. >>> >>>> And >>>> you say that it doesn’t matter at all what the designers of centrifuges say >>>> the principle of operation of centrifuges is, if your dim memory says >>>> otherwise, then you’d rather believe yourself than the designers. And you >>>> say that if you ask questions about any of this on Usenet, then experts are >>>> obligated to explain themselves to you until you are convinced. >>>> >>>> Are you nuts??? >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Calling the CF force is not real is a fanatical SR religious belief. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1. When you step on the gas in your car, you feel pressed back in your >>>>>>>>>> seat. In fact there is no force pushing you back in your seat. It is your >>>>>>>>>> mind mistakenly misinterpreting a force FORWARD one forward you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Moron, the seat is accelerating toward me and that’s why I feel the force >>>>>>>>> pushing me forward >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2. When your car makes a sudden left turn, you feel a sideways force >>>>>>>>>> pushing you to the right. In fact there is no force pushing you to the >>>>>>>>>> right. It is your mind mistakenly misinterpreting a mix of a force LEFT on >>>>>>>>>> your posterior and a lack of any force left or right on your head. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Moron, I am in a state of CF motion toward the door and the door is >>>>>>>>> stopping me go further. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 3. When you are in an elevator and press the Up button, you briefly feel >>>>>>>>>> heavier as though gravity downward has increa... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Moron, that’s because the floor of the elevator is in a state of CF >>>>>>>>> motion toward me and I was trying to stop it and that’s why I feel heavier. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 24 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web