Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462075

Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?
Date	2018-06-21 21:02 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pgh3pl$1bun$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <7da86ff9-35a3-4a37-985c-1fc3107f7829@googlegroups.com> <pgdu97$33f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <edba35d4-0c21-4e31-a685-a575ab15baa0@googlegroups.com> <pgeihf$15l9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f5ac156e-74e4-4164-ab3d-066a08b2684c@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:56:03 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 12:10:19 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 5:27:14 PM UTC-4, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-5, kenseto wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If gravity is strictly attractive, what is stopping the body go all the
>>>>>>> way to the center of the orbit? The answer: centrifugal force. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [replacement for a deleted post where I made an extremely silly typo]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Centrifugal force does not exist when you describe a system in an inertial 
>>>>>> (non-rotating) frame of reference. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument. Centrifugal force exists. There are
>>>>> countless applications using CF force...eg: centrifuges to separate
>>>>> material of different densities, gas centrifuges to separate different
>>>>> isotopes to make atomic bombs.
>>>> 
>>>> This has been explained to you many times. If you read design articles
>>>> about centrifuges you would see that they fully attribute the operation of
>>>> those devices to CENTRIPETAL accelerations and forces, not centrifugal. I
>>>> know your common sense, everyday experience says they are based on
>>>> centrifugal force. That common sense is wrong, and to correake ct that error
>>>> requires that you educate yourself by reading and to stop relying on your
>>>> common sense for everything.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Repeating nonsense does not make it true. 
>> 
>> Ken, if you’re going to claim that all of the basic physics textbooks in
>> the world are repeating nonsense, and that you (someone completely
>> uneducated in physics) know the truth based on your common experience, then
>> you shouldn’t be surprised if the only reaction you get is laughter. 
> 
> I am saying that the assertion that the CF force and acceleration is not
> real is completely bogus.....it doesn’t matter if it say so in text books.

Yes it does matter. If you are the only person on the planet who believes
that centrifugal force is real AND if you are the one uneducated in physics
AND if every physics book on the planet says centrifugal force is
fictional, then you are the one that is out of luck and out to lunch. 

It is STUPID for a person uneducated in physics to declare that basic
physics is wrong. 

> 
> 
>> 
>>> CP acceleration does not make the amusement rides work.....it is the ...
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

(Thread has 565 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web