Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388121 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-21 02:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-22 00:29 -0700 |
| Articles | 8 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 02:25 -0700
Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-21 19:34 +0000
Re: TAI twins Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:55 +0200
Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:37 -0700
Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-22 00:46 +0000
Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-22 01:04 -0700
Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:18 -0700
Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 00:29 -0700
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 02:25 -0700 |
| Subject | TAI twins |
| Message-ID | <9ed1cd24-257a-4ef8-9a22-1f454f5cc18c@googlegroups.com> |
W dniu środa, 20 lipca 2016 19:50:02 UTC+2 użytkownik Michael Moroney napisał: > Depends on the use. 99.9% of people need to keep synched > with the earth's cycles, better add the leap seconds and > use UT1. Fancy scientific stuff has to use TAI time as > the earth is not accurate enough, and leap seconds would do > bad things. OK. So scientist use TAI time... Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 one of them is launched. He travels with great speed blahblahblahblahblah and returns. For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for moving twins?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 19:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #388121 |
mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: >OK. So scientist use TAI time... >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for >moving twins? They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. But the travelling twin will still be younger. How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine while travelling into the future. How much will I have aged? 1) 3 years; 2) 1 hour; 3) Some other amount.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 22:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nmrcse$tpu$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #388140 |
Użytkownik "Michael Moroney" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com... mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: >OK. So scientist use TAI time... >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for >moving twins? |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. |But the travelling twin will still be younger. Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you. Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks used for "fancy scientific stuff". |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine |while travelling into the future. Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 16:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5f2da37-f661-4afc-849d-2dc42f8d7ac5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388147 |
On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "Michael Moroney" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com... > > mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: > > >OK. So scientist use TAI time... > >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. > >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 > >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed > >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. > >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 > >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for > >moving twins? > > |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. > |But the travelling twin will still be younger. > > Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you. > Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks > used for "fancy scientific stuff". > > > > |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb > |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 > |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of > |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine > |while travelling into the future. > > Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed > moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't > experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:( Hey Michael, it's an interesting study in schizophrenia or something similar. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmrqcq$b3h$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #388152 |
JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> writes: >On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wo=C5=BAniak wrote: >> U=C5=BCytkownik "Michael Moroney" napisa=C5=82 w wiadomo=C5=9Bci grup=20 >> dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com... >> mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: >> >OK. So scientist use TAI time... >> >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. >> >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 >> >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed >> >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. >> >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 >> >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for >> >moving twins? >> |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. >> |But the travelling twin will still be younger. >> Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you. >> Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks >> used for "fancy scientific stuff". >> |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb >> |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 >> |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of >> |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine >> |while travelling into the future. >> Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed >> moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't >> experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:( >Hey Michael, it's an interesting study in schizophrenia or something >similar. I know. I like arguing with kooks. I've mentioned my interest in arguing with kooks many times. I have learned a bit about abnormal psychology from sci.physics. Eventually I will get bored of this kook and start kookwatching some other one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 01:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <09dd2305-d33f-4d62-bf2d-019263aeb0ea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388154 |
W dniu piątek, 22 lipca 2016 02:47:10 UTC+2 użytkownik Michael Moroney napisał: > Eventually I will get bored of this kook and start kookwatching some other > one. It's always boring, when your ass is brutally kicked in a game you imagine you master. Yeah, go somewhere else, to a kook you can kick as easily, as I can kick you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 23:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fedc7e23-ef89-45ec-ac59-da9cde381f67@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388152 |
W dniu piątek, 22 lipca 2016 01:57:20 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "Michael Moroney" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com... > > > > mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: > > > > >OK. So scientist use TAI time... > > >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. > > >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 > > >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed > > >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. > > >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 > > >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for > > >moving twins? > > > > |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. > > |But the travelling twin will still be younger. > > > > Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you. > > Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks > > used for "fancy scientific stuff". > > > > > > > > |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb > > |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 > > |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of > > |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine > > |while travelling into the future. > > > > Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed > > moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't > > experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:( > > Hey Michael, it's an interesting study in schizophrenia or something > similar. Rave, moron, and spit. What else can a moron do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 00:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1b244b2-7ac5-4e0b-9f9a-23aa2cc17fa9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388158 |
On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 11:18:23 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu piątek, 22 lipca 2016 01:57:20 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "Michael Moroney" napisał w wiadomości grup > > > dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com... > > > > > > mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: > > > > > > >OK. So scientist use TAI time... > > > >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. > > > >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 > > > >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed > > > >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. > > > >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 > > > >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for > > > >moving twins? > > > > > > |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. > > > |But the travelling twin will still be younger. > > > > > > Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you. > > > Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks > > > used for "fancy scientific stuff". > > > > > > > > > > > > |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb > > > |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 > > > |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of > > > |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine > > > |while travelling into the future. > > > > > > Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed > > > moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't > > > experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:( > > > > Hey Michael, it's an interesting study in schizophrenia or something > > similar. > > Rave, moron, and spit. What else can a moron do. Yes, this is all you can do. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web