Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388154

Re: TAI twins

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: TAI twins
Date 2016-07-22 00:46 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <nmrqcq$b3h$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <9ed1cd24-257a-4ef8-9a22-1f454f5cc18c@googlegroups.com> <nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com> <nmrcse$tpu$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <f5f2da37-f661-4afc-849d-2dc42f8d7ac5@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> writes:

>On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wo=C5=BAniak wrote:
>> U=C5=BCytkownik "Michael Moroney"  napisa=C5=82 w wiadomo=C5=9Bci grup=20
>> dyskusyjnych:nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com...

>> mlwozniak@wp.pl writes:

>> >OK. So scientist use TAI time...
>> >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins.
>> >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000
>> >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed
>> >blahblahblahblahblah and returns.
>> >For stationary twins it's now TAI  04.02.2023
>> >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for
>> >moving twins?

>> |They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth.
>> |But the travelling twin will still be younger.

>> Yeah, I know your idiot guru told you.
>> Clocks have different opinion. Akso these TAI clocks
>> used for "fancy scientific stuff".

>> |How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb
>> |into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023
>> |12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of
>> |elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine
>> |while travelling into the future.

>> Yeah. Time machine. A moronic phantasmagories of a brainwashed
>> moron. Wristwatch, you say? According to my wristwatch I didn't
>> experience any elapsed time for some weeks. I must buy a new one:(

>Hey Michael, it's an interesting study in schizophrenia or something
>similar.

I know. I like arguing with kooks.  I've mentioned my interest in arguing
with kooks many times.  I have learned a bit about abnormal psychology
from sci.physics.

Eventually I will get bored of this kook and start kookwatching some other
one.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 02:25 -0700
  Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-21 19:34 +0000
    Re: TAI twins Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:55 +0200
      Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:37 -0700
        Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-22 00:46 +0000
          Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-22 01:04 -0700
        Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:18 -0700
          Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 00:29 -0700

csiph-web