Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388140
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: TAI twins |
| Date | 2016-07-21 19:34 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nmr84o$o6n$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9ed1cd24-257a-4ef8-9a22-1f454f5cc18c@googlegroups.com> |
mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: >OK. So scientist use TAI time... >Do you like gedanken? Suppose we have 2 identical twins. >At the TAI moment 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 >one of them is launched. He travels with great speed >blahblahblahblahblah and returns. >For stationary twins it's now TAI 04.02.2023 >12:00:00.00000000000000000. What is the TAI for >moving twins? They will agree on the TAI time once both are on Earth. But the travelling twin will still be younger. How about this: At 24.02.2020 12:00:00.00000000000000000 I climb into my time machine and travel into the future, to 24.02.2023 12:00:00.00000000000000000. I experience exactly one hour of elapsed time (according to my wristwatch) inside the time machine while travelling into the future. How much will I have aged? 1) 3 years; 2) 1 hour; 3) Some other amount.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 02:25 -0700
Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-21 19:34 +0000
Re: TAI twins Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:55 +0200
Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:37 -0700
Re: TAI twins moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-22 00:46 +0000
Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-22 01:04 -0700
Re: TAI twins mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:18 -0700
Re: TAI twins JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 00:29 -0700
csiph-web