Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613638 > unrolled thread

Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Brennan Otten <nnna@nebnrnea.ea> - 2023-06-24 19:20 +0000
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Hoang Kouman <gago@hhngnaoa.om> - 2023-06-24 22:22 +0000
      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bennett Sniders <rtne@etnnneis.bn> - 2023-06-24 23:28 +0000
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:53 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:58 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Deandre Romijnsen <dsrm@nnrderee.ds> - 2023-06-26 21:36 +0000
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:57 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bernard Bueren <buur@enbeebdn.ru> - 2023-06-25 08:00 +0000
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-25 17:50 +0200
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:47 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:46 -0700
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:56 -0400
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:37 -0700
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 14:00 -0400
                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:07 -0700
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-28 14:16 -0400
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Devoise Kool <ovve@sdodevlv.el> - 2023-06-28 21:56 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Vlademire Ramaker <arde@rekeadem.ae> - 2023-06-25 19:18 +0000
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:54 -0400
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Nikki Cann <nika@kinianka.ka> - 2023-06-25 22:06 +0000
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:15 -0700
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 18:30 -0400
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Shan Kloeten <ntne@ntnnstke.sn> - 2023-06-26 06:45 +0000
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Barton Houtem <otub@ahutnaee.eb> - 2023-06-26 06:58 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:24 -0700
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:47 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Buddy Oorschot <ocuo@codhudoh.to> - 2023-06-25 20:22 +0000
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:20 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Geosvani Peter <ogtv@asvsegtg.vp> - 2023-06-25 21:30 +0000
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:51 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Dustan Rademaker <mdrn@eurttrrn.de> - 2023-06-25 22:16 +0000
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:18 -0700
                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Lemuel Marqueringh <argr@hqqgugqi.lr> - 2023-06-25 22:57 +0000
                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 00:19 -0400
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Markeen Schenck <ecme@kckhhkkc.kn> - 2023-06-26 07:09 +0000
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 12:58 -0400
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Germaine Breda <eraa@gmeenmad.dr> - 2023-06-26 22:37 +0000
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Morris Offermans <oeoe@ssoaanmf.sr> - 2023-06-26 07:22 +0000
                              A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 14:23 -0500
                                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
                                  Re: A Little Insight nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
                                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Foster Smeets <fste@sstffsem.ee> - 2023-06-26 21:14 +0000
                                  Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 00:03 -0400
                                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Connor Maas <naoa@nnsamoss.co> - 2023-06-26 21:27 +0000
                                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:58 -0400
                                  Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 23:43 -0500
                                  Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Valery Schuyler <evrl@leerrael.hc> - 2023-06-27 11:48 +0000
                                    Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-27 14:37 -0500
                                      Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Houston Beek <nnoo@bbookeon.ub> - 2023-06-27 22:23 +0000
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:20 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ezra Venn <rene@nvanarvz.vn> - 2023-06-25 22:49 +0000
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Duncan Antwerp <anec@cnancrwp.ca> - 2023-06-26 22:20 +0000
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:43 -0400
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 19:48 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maron Andel <nado@eredlemn.rl> - 2023-06-26 22:25 +0000
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:05 -0400
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:08 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:10 -0700
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:32 -0400
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is> - 2023-06-25 08:06 +0000

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#613806

Volney wrote:

>>>> Huh? i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999. Take n to
>>>> infinity.
>>> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or
>>> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal
>>> sequences
>> you chemically nazified khazar immigrant of america the 0.(9) is
>> standard notation.
> In nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐, yes. More civilized countries often use other
> methods

it's not you talking, my friend. It's t̳̳h̳̳e̳̳ F̳̳l̳̳u̳̳o̳̳r̳̳i̳̳d̳̳e̳̳ i̳̳n̳̳ y̳̳o̳̳u̳̳r̳̳ w̳̳a̳̳t̳̳e̳̳r̳̳ talking.
And you will never talk otherwise. Everything in capitalist america and
capitalist uk, *_is_falling_apart_*. You won't feel anything. All bliss 
and harmony.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613752

Volney wrote:

>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in
>>> sleep.
>> Huh? i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999. Take n to infinity.
> 
> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or
> with

US/NAZO/UK/ISRAEL Fascist Alliance orders Yelensky to demand more 
‘pressure’ on Moscow. That poor nazi bandit bastard Yelensky, is not even 
a delivery boy, but a lapdog, so to speak!

Is it this frist time Belensky don't as fro more money!?? Why, because the 
fucking gay actor on cocaine knows, *_and_reveals_*, how the fucking happy 
*_funny_money_* are made on a fucking computer. In *_i[n]_* they take 
*_n_* to infinity. There is no lack nor pause in the money supply in the  
fucking *_collective_west_* and the fucking terrorist america.

 *_Zelensky_demands_more_‘pressure’_on_Moscow_*
The Ukrainian gay actor khazar on cocaine, said, the campaign against 
Russia must continue until “international order” is restored 
https://%72t.com/r%75%73%73ia/578700-zelensky-more-pressure-russia/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613789 — A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence)

On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before 
>>>>> assignment. It
>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands for in
>>>>> physics, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
>>>>> 0.999999.
>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
>>>> .99 is greater than .9
>>>
>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep.
>>
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....
>>
>> Take n to infinity.
> 
> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or 
> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal sequences 
> in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind you that the 
> nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the main FSB building 
> in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.

A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts

It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being
a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy
toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613794 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence)

In sci.physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote:
> On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before 
>>>>>> assignment. It
>>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands for in
>>>>>> physics, idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
>>>>>> 0.999999.
>>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
>>>>> .99 is greater than .9
>>>>
>>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
>>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep.
>>>
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....
>>>
>>> Take n to infinity.
>> 
>> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or 
>> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal sequences 
>> in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind you that the 
>> nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the main FSB building 
>> in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.
> 
> A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts
> 
> It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being
> a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy
> toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper.
> 

I wonder if toilet paper is even available since Russia managed to cut
itself off from most of the rest of the world.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613843 — Re: A Little Insight

Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

> In sci.physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote:
> > On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
> >> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
> >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before 
> >>>>>> assignment. It
> >>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands for in
> >>>>>> physics, idiot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
> >>>>>> 0.999999.
> >>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
> >>>>> .99 is greater than .9
> >>>>
> >>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
> >>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Huh?
> >>>
> >>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....
> >>>
> >>> Take n to infinity.
> >> 
> >> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or
> >> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal sequences
> >> in nazified ?Ru????ia?. There's no need for me to remind you that the
> >> nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the main FSB building
> >> in St. Petersburg in nazified ?Ru????ia?.
> > 
> > A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts
> > 
> > It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being
> > a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy
> > toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper.
> > 
> 
> I wonder if toilet paper is even available since Russia managed to cut
> itself off from most of the rest of the world.

Have the Jehovahs stopped shipping bibles?

Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613798 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating

whodat wrote:

> A̶ l̶i̶t̶t̶l̶e̶ i̶n̶s̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ i̶n̶t̶o̶ t̶h̶e̶ w̶o̶r̶l̶d̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ m̶a̶d̶e̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶:
> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://w̶w̶w̶.y̶o̶u̶t̶u̶b̶e̶.c̶o̶m̶/w̶a̶t̶c̶h̶?v̶=v̶J̶C̶H̶X̶n̶C̶R̶g̶t̶s̶
> I̶t̶ s̶e̶e̶m̶s̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ f̶a̶l̶l̶s̶ i̶n̶ a̶ c̶a̶t̶e̶g̶o̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ "n̶o̶r̶m̶a̶l̶" f̶o̶r̶ b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ a̶
> R̶u̶s̶s̶i̶a̶n̶ i̶n̶ 2023. I̶ d̶o̶n̶'t̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶s̶ i̶n̶ l̶i̶n̶e̶ t̶o̶ b̶u̶y̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶
> p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶, I̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ w̶h̶e̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ h̶e̶ c̶a̶n̶ a̶f̶f̶o̶r̶d̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶.

but you can suck his large dick anytime to find out. The Mother Russia has 
*_the_largest_forests_in_the_world_*, you *_stupid_suburban_*. Plainly you 
are stupid in many areas. Here's another thing.

 *_Russia_builds_world’s_most_powerful_rocket_engine_*
Roscosmos has announced production of the first sample of the RD-171MV 
engine for the Soyuz-5 launch vehicle 
https://%72t.com/r%75%73%73ia/578515-roscosmos-new-rocket-engine/

Russia brought *_gringo_traitors_* to the international space station, and 
back again. You disgusting excrement. I have to underline, you s̳t̳i̳n̳k̳i̳n̳g̳ 
s̳u̳b̳h̳u̳m̳a̳n̳ e̳x̳c̳r̳e̳m̳e̳n̳t̳. You are supporting terrorists in europe, you fucking 
stupid. You'll probably be brought public places with a paid bullet in 
your pocket. Take care. About the shit you devour. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613835 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating

On 6/26/2023 5:14 PM, Foster Smeets wrote:
> whodat wrote:
> 
>> A̶ l̶i̶t̶t̶l̶e̶ i̶n̶s̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ i̶n̶t̶o̶ t̶h̶e̶ w̶o̶r̶l̶d̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ m̶a̶d̶e̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶:
>> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://w̶w̶w̶.y̶o̶u̶t̶u̶b̶e̶.c̶o̶m̶/w̶a̶t̶c̶h̶?v̶=v̶J̶C̶H̶X̶n̶C̶R̶g̶t̶s̶
>> I̶t̶ s̶e̶e̶m̶s̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ f̶a̶l̶l̶s̶ i̶n̶ a̶ c̶a̶t̶e̶g̶o̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ "n̶o̶r̶m̶a̶l̶" f̶o̶r̶ b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ a̶
>> R̶u̶s̶s̶i̶a̶n̶ i̶n̶ 2023. I̶ d̶o̶n̶'t̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶s̶ i̶n̶ l̶i̶n̶e̶ t̶o̶ b̶u̶y̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶
>> p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶, I̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ w̶h̶e̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ h̶e̶ c̶a̶n̶ a̶f̶f̶o̶r̶d̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶.
> 
> but you can suck his large dick anytime to find out. The Mother Russia has
> *_the_largest_forests_in_the_world_*, you *_stupid_suburban_*.

Aha, that's the answer. The nymshifter uses pine cones, readily 
available in the largest forests of Nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613799 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely

whodat wrote:

>> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or
>> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal
>> sequences in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind you
>> that the nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the main
>> FSB building in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.
> 
> A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:

y̳̳o̳̳u̳̳ c̳̳e̳̳r̳̳t̳̳a̳̳i̳̳n̳̳l̳̳y̳̳ m̳̳a̳̳y̳̳ s̳̳u̳̳c̳̳k̳̳ h̳̳i̳̳s̳̳ l̳̳a̳̳r̳̳g̳̳e̳̳ d̳̳i̳̳c̳̳k̳̳, you uneducated braindead suburban 
excrement. I have to underline.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613834 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence)

On 6/26/2023 3:23 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before 
>>>>>> assignment. It
>>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands 
>>>>>> for in
>>>>>> physics, idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
>>>>>> 0.999999.
>>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
>>>>> .99 is greater than .9
>>>>
>>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
>>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep.
>>>
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....
>>>
>>> Take n to infinity.
>>
>> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or 
>> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal 
>> sequences in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind 
>> you that the nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the 
>> main FSB building in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.
> 
> A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts
> 
> It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being
> a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy
> toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper.
> 
I wonder if he even knows what toilet paper is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613839 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence)

On 6/26/2023 10:58 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 6/26/2023 3:23 PM, whodat wrote:
>> On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before 
>>>>>>> assignment. It
>>>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands 
>>>>>>> for in
>>>>>>> physics, idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
>>>>>>> 0.999999.
>>>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
>>>>>> .99 is greater than .9
>>>>>
>>>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
>>>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in 
>>>>> sleep.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Huh?
>>>>
>>>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....
>>>>
>>>> Take n to infinity.
>>>
>>> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or 
>>> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal 
>>> sequences in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind 
>>> you that the nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the 
>>> main FSB building in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.
>>
>> A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts
>>
>> It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being
>> a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy
>> toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper.
>>
> I wonder if he even knows what toilet paper is.

Probably heard about it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613847 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating)

Volney wrote:

> I̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ e̶v̶e̶n̶ k̶n̶o̶w̶s̶ w̶h̶a̶t̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶ i̶s̶.

indeed, you immigrants of america cant even shit in a forest, without
toilet paper.

anyhow, here's *_the_capitalist_west_*, nazi nato and america, trapped
*_in_their_own_propaganda_*. Genial beyond my level. Just imagine
*_the_size_of_the_brain_*, to catch the entire fucking
*_collective_west_*, in their own propaganda. The short khazar goy
motherfucker brought hell on the face of the earth. Amazing.

mercy? These "slava ukraine" nazis killed women on streets since 2014,
it's hard to give them mercy. Having the stomach (18++), you probably have
to watch it a few time to undrestand.

Full Video Even Worse - 47th Brigade AFU Is Torn To Pieces in Zaporozhye -
Mass Slaughter (18++)
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/7UZ51G4GTgM0

the prigojina left to Belarus, the capitalist west still don't
undrestand what is going on. Imagine those "experts", "analyst" etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613868 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating)

On 6/27/2023 11:40 AM, bozo de niro wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 27, 2023 at 4:48:40 AM UTC-7, Valery Schuyler wrote:
>> Volney wrote:
>>
>>> I̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ e̶v̶e̶n̶ k̶n̶o̶w̶s̶ w̶h̶a̶t̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶ i̶s̶.
>>
>> indeed, you immigrants of america cant even shit in a forest, without
>> toilet paper.
>>
>> anyhow, here's *_the_capitalist_west_*, nazi nato and america, trapped
>> *_in_their_own_propaganda_*. Genial beyond my level. Just imagine
>> *_the_size_of_the_brain_*, to catch the entire fucking
>> *_collective_west_*, in their own propaganda. The short khazar goy
>> motherfucker brought hell on the face of the earth. Amazing.
>>
>> mercy? These "slava ukraine" nazis killed women on streets since 2014,
>> it's hard to give them mercy. Having the stomach (18++), you probably have
>> to watch it a few time to undrestand.
>>
>> Full Video Even Worse - 47th Brigade AFU Is Torn To Pieces in Zaporozhye -
>> Mass Slaughter (18++)
>> https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/7UZ51G4GTgM0
>>
>> the prigojina left to Belarus, the capitalist west still don't
>> undrestand what is going on. Imagine those "experts", "analyst" etc.
> 
> You're trying so so hard and getting so so close to saying something you want to say and feel but still missing it with your comment of "the short khazar goy
> motherfucker brought hell on the face of the earth. Amazing" comment"  --- so close but still so far away .

He should be paying attention to what his countrymen are
saying about Russia today. He'd be laughable if he weren't
so pathetic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613890 — Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating)

whodat wrote:
>>> Full Video Even Worse - 47th Brigade AFU Is Torn To Pieces in
>>> Zaporozhye - Mass Slaughter (18++)
>>> https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/7UZ51G4GTgM0
>>> the prigojina left to Belarus, the capitalist west still don't
>>> undrestand what is going on. Imagine those "experts", "analyst" etc.
>> Y̶o̶u̶'r̶e̶ t̶r̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ s̶o̶ s̶o̶ h̶a̶r̶d̶ a̶n̶d̶ g̶e̶t̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ s̶o̶ s̶o̶ c̶l̶o̶s̶e̶ t̶o̶ s̶a̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ s̶o̶m̶e̶t̶h̶i̶n̶g̶
>> y̶o̶u̶ w̶a̶n̶t̶ t̶o̶ s̶a̶y̶ a̶n̶d̶ f̶e̶e̶l̶ b̶u̶t̶ s̶t̶i̶l̶l̶ m̶i̶s̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ i̶t̶ w̶i̶t̶h̶ y̶o̶u̶r̶ c̶o̶m̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ o̶f̶ "t̶h̶e̶
>> s̶h̶o̶r̶t̶ k̶h̶a̶za̶r̶ g̶o̶y̶ m̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶f̶u̶c̶k̶e̶r̶ b̶r̶o̶u̶g̶h̶t̶ h̶e̶l̶l̶ o̶n̶ t̶h̶e̶ f̶a̶c̶e̶ o̶f̶ t̶h̶e̶ e̶a̶r̶t̶h̶.
>> A̶m̶a̶zi̶n̶g̶" c̶o̶m̶m̶e̶n̶t̶" --- s̶o̶ c̶l̶o̶s̶e̶ b̶u̶t̶ s̶t̶i̶l̶l̶ s̶o̶ f̶a̶r̶ a̶w̶a̶y̶ .
> H̶e̶ s̶h̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ b̶e̶ p̶a̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ a̶t̶t̶e̶n̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ t̶o̶ w̶h̶a̶t̶ h̶i̶s̶ c̶o̶u̶n̶t̶r̶y̶m̶e̶n̶ a̶r̶e̶ s̶a̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶
> R̶u̶s̶s̶i̶a̶ t̶o̶d̶a̶y̶. H̶e̶'d̶ b̶e̶ l̶a̶u̶g̶h̶a̶b̶l̶e̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ w̶e̶r̶e̶n̶'t̶ s̶o̶ p̶a̶t̶h̶e̶t̶i̶c̶.

you dementia hit babbling idiot, here is what Musk says about the 
Russians. Watch the picture too.

Musk calls out ‘crazy and cruel’ take on Russia
https://%72t.com/news/578807-musk-russia-graham-comments/
https://mf.b37mrtl.%72u/files/2023.06/l/649b0e0f85f54006b4448ce4.jpg

“This is Russia a day after the failed mutiny,” Ian Miles Cheong posted on 
Monday, with a 25-second video of dressed-up graduates singing 
*_‘I_am_Russian,’_* last summer’s hit song by the pop star Shaman. 

“That was a crazy and cruel thing for him to say,” Musk chimed in. “If 
those kids wanted to be at the front lines, 
*_they_wouldn't_need_to_be_conscripted_*.”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613732

On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before assignment. It
>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands for in
>>> physics, idiot.
>>>
>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and
>>> 0.999999.
>>> You lack basic education, idiot.
>>
>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw:
>> .99 is greater than .9
> 
> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your
> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep.

You are in a fog or something...

Lets check:

i[0] = (floor(1/9 * 10^0) / 10^0) * 9 = 0
i[1] = (floor(1/9 * 10^1) / 10^1) * 9 = .9
i[2] = (floor(1/9 * 10^2) / 10^2) * 9 = .99
i[3] = (floor(1/9 * 10^3) / 10^3) * 9 = .999
...

i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999....

We can say that when n is taken to infinity, it can equal one, just like 
.999... is one in base ten.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613734

Volney wrote:

> With an infinity of terms, there are an infinite number of 9s to the
> right of the decimal point, so it is 1.

another big mouth on a face, doesn't undrestand what i̳n̳f̳i̳n̳i̳t̳y̳ stands for 
in math and physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613804

Fritz Feldhase wrote:

> What you seem to have "in mind" is the simple fact that lim_(n->oo) i[n]
> = 1.

how is that 1.0 when you know it never intersects 1.0, you fucking 
stoopid?? You don't know what an equal sign stands for?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613809

Duncan Antwerp expressed precisely :
> Fritz Feldhase wrote:
>
>> What you seem to have "in mind" is the simple fact that lim_(n->oo) i[n]
>> = 1.
>
> how is that 1.0 when you know it never intersects 1.0, you fucking 
> stoopid??

Because it is a cauchy sequence in the reals.

> You don't know what an equal sign stands for?

You don't know what real numbers are. You fall on your face every time 
you post, ha ha ha.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613820

.999 repeating and the first integer are not the same quantity.
They plot differently on a quantity line.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613805

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> On 6/26/2023 3:15 PM, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 27, 2023 at 12:06:22 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson
>> wrote:
>>> Are you having a bad hair day or something?
>> No, only an inflation of idiots on sci.math.
> Constructing .(9) on a per-iterate basis does not change the fact that
> .(9) = 1 in an instant, no time used.

cretin.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613668

Chris M. Thomasson laid this down on his screen :
> On 6/24/2023 3:22 PM, Hoang Kouman wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>>>> it has nothing to do with unity.
>>>
>>> Unity and one are the first integer.
>>> They are built by an infinite sequence of the infinitesimal.
>> 
>> no. Your 0.(9) is *_never_* an integer. It stays in the description.
>
> .999... is not an integer, however it has a limit of one.

Yes it is an integer. It is an integer as embedded in the reals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web