Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613835

Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating

From Volney <volney@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating
Date 2023-06-27 00:03 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <u7dn21$19roq$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <u7aebk$2chir$1@paganini.bofh.team> <u7aegi$k662$1@dont-email.me> <u7b3jr$q0ut$1@dont-email.me> <kfu6ufFdb15U1@mid.individual.net> <u7cv4a$2pip5$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/26/2023 5:14 PM, Foster Smeets wrote:
> whodat wrote:
> 
>> A̶ l̶i̶t̶t̶l̶e̶ i̶n̶s̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ i̶n̶t̶o̶ t̶h̶e̶ w̶o̶r̶l̶d̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ m̶a̶d̶e̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶:
>> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://w̶w̶w̶.y̶o̶u̶t̶u̶b̶e̶.c̶o̶m̶/w̶a̶t̶c̶h̶?v̶=v̶J̶C̶H̶X̶n̶C̶R̶g̶t̶s̶
>> I̶t̶ s̶e̶e̶m̶s̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ f̶a̶l̶l̶s̶ i̶n̶ a̶ c̶a̶t̶e̶g̶o̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ "n̶o̶r̶m̶a̶l̶" f̶o̶r̶ b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ a̶
>> R̶u̶s̶s̶i̶a̶n̶ i̶n̶ 2023. I̶ d̶o̶n̶'t̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ i̶f̶ h̶e̶ s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶s̶ i̶n̶ l̶i̶n̶e̶ t̶o̶ b̶u̶y̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶
>> p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶, I̶ w̶o̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ w̶h̶e̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ h̶e̶ c̶a̶n̶ a̶f̶f̶o̶r̶d̶ t̶o̶i̶l̶e̶t̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶.
> 
> but you can suck his large dick anytime to find out. The Mother Russia has
> *_the_largest_forests_in_the_world_*, you *_stupid_suburban_*.

Aha, that's the answer. The nymshifter uses pine cones, readily 
available in the largest forests of Nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Brennan Otten <nnna@nebnrnea.ea> - 2023-06-24 19:20 +0000
  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Hoang Kouman <gago@hhngnaoa.om> - 2023-06-24 22:22 +0000
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700
      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bennett Sniders <rtne@etnnneis.bn> - 2023-06-24 23:28 +0000
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:53 -0700
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:58 -0700
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Deandre Romijnsen <dsrm@nnrderee.ds> - 2023-06-26 21:36 +0000
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:57 -0700
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bernard Bueren <buur@enbeebdn.ru> - 2023-06-25 08:00 +0000
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-25 17:50 +0200
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:47 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:46 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:56 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:37 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 14:00 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:07 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-28 14:16 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Devoise Kool <ovve@sdodevlv.el> - 2023-06-28 21:56 +0000
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Vlademire Ramaker <arde@rekeadem.ae> - 2023-06-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:54 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Nikki Cann <nika@kinianka.ka> - 2023-06-25 22:06 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:15 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 18:30 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Shan Kloeten <ntne@ntnnstke.sn> - 2023-06-26 06:45 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Barton Houtem <otub@ahutnaee.eb> - 2023-06-26 06:58 +0000
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:47 -0700
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Buddy Oorschot <ocuo@codhudoh.to> - 2023-06-25 20:22 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:20 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Geosvani Peter <ogtv@asvsegtg.vp> - 2023-06-25 21:30 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:51 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Dustan Rademaker <mdrn@eurttrrn.de> - 2023-06-25 22:16 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:18 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Lemuel Marqueringh <argr@hqqgugqi.lr> - 2023-06-25 22:57 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 00:19 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Markeen Schenck <ecme@kckhhkkc.kn> - 2023-06-26 07:09 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 12:58 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Germaine Breda <eraa@gmeenmad.dr> - 2023-06-26 22:37 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Morris Offermans <oeoe@ssoaanmf.sr> - 2023-06-26 07:22 +0000
                A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 14:23 -0500
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
                Re: A Little Insight nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Foster Smeets <fste@sstffsem.ee> - 2023-06-26 21:14 +0000
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 00:03 -0400
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Connor Maas <naoa@nnsamoss.co> - 2023-06-26 21:27 +0000
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:58 -0400
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 23:43 -0500
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Valery Schuyler <evrl@leerrael.hc> - 2023-06-27 11:48 +0000
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-27 14:37 -0500
                Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Houston Beek <nnoo@bbookeon.ub> - 2023-06-27 22:23 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:20 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ezra Venn <rene@nvanarvz.vn> - 2023-06-25 22:49 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Duncan Antwerp <anec@cnancrwp.ca> - 2023-06-26 22:20 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:43 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 19:48 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maron Andel <nado@eredlemn.rl> - 2023-06-26 22:25 +0000
      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:05 -0400
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:08 -0700
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:10 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:32 -0400
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is> - 2023-06-25 08:06 +0000

csiph-web