Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613834
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) |
| Date | 2023-06-26 23:58 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <u7dmpe$19roq$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <u7acsi$jt7g$2@dont-email.me> <u7aebk$2chir$1@paganini.bofh.team> <u7aegi$k662$1@dont-email.me> <u7b3jr$q0ut$1@dont-email.me> <kfu6ufFdb15U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 6/26/2023 3:23 PM, whodat wrote: > On 6/25/2023 11:19 PM, Volney wrote: >> On 6/25/2023 6:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 6/25/2023 3:16 PM, Dustan Rademaker wrote: >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> >>>>>> you can't see you have another function fucked up before >>>>>> assignment. It >>>>>> has nothing to do with your truncation. See what "floor" stands >>>>>> for in >>>>>> physics, idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> this imbecile is saying that 0.(9) is the same as 1.0, 0.999 and >>>>>> 0.999999. >>>>>> You lack basic education, idiot. >>>>> >>>>> Lol. I know exactly what the floor function does. Btw: >>>>> .99 is greater than .9 >>>> >>>> it's not about the greatness the discussion is about, idiot. Your >>>> fucking .99 has nothing to do with .(9). Now go fart yourself in sleep. >>> >>> >>> Huh? >>> >>> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .999.... >>> >>> Take n to infinity. >> >> When the nymshifter wrote 0.(9) it's the same as writing 0.999... or >> with a bar over the 9s. That's how they show repeating decimal >> sequences in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. There's no need for me to remind >> you that the nymshifter is one of Putin's stooges, posting from the >> main FSB building in St. Petersburg in nazified 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐. > > A little insight into the world that made the nymshifter: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCHXnCRgts > > It seems the nymshifter falls in a category of "normal" for being > a Russian in 2023. I don't wonder if he stands in line to buy > toilet paper, I wonder whether he can afford toilet paper. > I wonder if he even knows what toilet paper is.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Brennan Otten <nnna@nebnrnea.ea> - 2023-06-24 19:20 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Hoang Kouman <gago@hhngnaoa.om> - 2023-06-24 22:22 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bennett Sniders <rtne@etnnneis.bn> - 2023-06-24 23:28 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:53 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:58 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Deandre Romijnsen <dsrm@nnrderee.ds> - 2023-06-26 21:36 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:57 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bernard Bueren <buur@enbeebdn.ru> - 2023-06-25 08:00 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-25 17:50 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:47 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:46 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:56 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:37 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 14:00 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:07 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-28 14:16 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Devoise Kool <ovve@sdodevlv.el> - 2023-06-28 21:56 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Vlademire Ramaker <arde@rekeadem.ae> - 2023-06-25 19:18 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:54 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Nikki Cann <nika@kinianka.ka> - 2023-06-25 22:06 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:15 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 18:30 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Shan Kloeten <ntne@ntnnstke.sn> - 2023-06-26 06:45 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Barton Houtem <otub@ahutnaee.eb> - 2023-06-26 06:58 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:24 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:47 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Buddy Oorschot <ocuo@codhudoh.to> - 2023-06-25 20:22 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:20 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Geosvani Peter <ogtv@asvsegtg.vp> - 2023-06-25 21:30 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:51 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Dustan Rademaker <mdrn@eurttrrn.de> - 2023-06-25 22:16 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:18 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Lemuel Marqueringh <argr@hqqgugqi.lr> - 2023-06-25 22:57 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 00:19 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Markeen Schenck <ecme@kckhhkkc.kn> - 2023-06-26 07:09 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 12:58 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Germaine Breda <eraa@gmeenmad.dr> - 2023-06-26 22:37 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Morris Offermans <oeoe@ssoaanmf.sr> - 2023-06-26 07:22 +0000
A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 14:23 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
Re: A Little Insight nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Foster Smeets <fste@sstffsem.ee> - 2023-06-26 21:14 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 00:03 -0400
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Connor Maas <naoa@nnsamoss.co> - 2023-06-26 21:27 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:58 -0400
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 23:43 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Valery Schuyler <evrl@leerrael.hc> - 2023-06-27 11:48 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-27 14:37 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Houston Beek <nnoo@bbookeon.ub> - 2023-06-27 22:23 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:20 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ezra Venn <rene@nvanarvz.vn> - 2023-06-25 22:49 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Duncan Antwerp <anec@cnancrwp.ca> - 2023-06-26 22:20 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:43 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 19:48 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maron Andel <nado@eredlemn.rl> - 2023-06-26 22:25 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:05 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:08 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:10 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:32 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is> - 2023-06-25 08:06 +0000
csiph-web