Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392061 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-14 03:58 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 416 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Normal Human <NH@....> - 2016-09-12 08:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 15:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-11 16:28 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-12 00:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 07:31 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 12:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 05:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 08:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 07:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 14:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 19:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 12:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 22:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-12 22:18 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 06:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 23:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 22:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 20:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 01:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-15 11:29 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 20:44 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-16 06:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 20:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 19:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-16 10:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-17 11:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 16:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 11:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 09:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 03:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-18 20:56 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 16:11 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 11:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 12:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 19:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 09:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-22 00:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 03:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 18:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-22 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 10:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 12:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-23 14:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 10:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 05:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 19:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 17:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 06:44 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-25 22:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-26 17:56 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 23:09 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 20:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 10:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 03:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 11:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 20:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 04:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-29 10:07 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-29 08:04 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-27 19:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-27 05:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-27 20:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 01:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 23:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 15:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-29 00:03 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 00:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 00:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-29 15:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 23:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 11:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-27 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 14:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 10:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 16:08 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 08:53 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 17:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-20 09:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 12:05 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 20:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 23:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 00:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 11:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 23:38 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 22:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 04:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 21:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 16:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:11 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 08:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-21 23:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 17:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 22:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 12:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 02:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 22:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-22 22:25 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 04:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 18:20 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 09:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 18:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 10:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-24 04:29 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 17:29 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-23 23:20 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-23 16:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-23 15:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-24 16:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 15:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 21:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-26 01:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-22 18:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-21 17:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 17:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-22 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 17:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 10:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 11:26 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 04:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 22:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 09:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-23 03:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-24 12:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-24 16:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-25 11:59 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-25 13:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-25 23:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 10:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 04:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 14:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 23:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-27 10:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 09:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-20 20:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 21:47 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-17 16:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 18:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 00:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 23:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 20:06 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 20:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 23:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 12:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 05:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:13 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-09-22 11:51 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-22 11:04 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 14:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 16:04 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 11:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-01 20:26 -0500
To A Atheism The Science Of Language Is Rrelativity "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-19 15:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 22:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 18:59 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 00:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-19 17:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 08:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 12:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-13 07:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 18:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 21:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 06:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 02:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 06:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 12:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 15:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:29 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 14:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-15 19:37 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-14 01:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 19:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 14:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 23:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 06:40 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-16 18:57 -0500
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:15 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:33 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:37 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:05 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 10:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 14:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 09:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-13 17:21 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 03:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 20:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 20:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-14 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 21:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 09:32 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 17:38 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 23:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 18:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 22:48 +0200
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-09-15 15:02 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-16 01:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-18 13:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-18 21:01 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 17:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 21:38 -0700
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-19 23:37 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 23:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 15:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 18:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 15:14 -0400
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-20 13:46 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 20:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 17:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 21:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 16:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 16:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-17 19:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 06:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 23:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 20:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-30 06:33 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-29 23:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 02:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 11:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-01 10:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-30 02:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 11:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-30 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 23:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-01 08:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-01 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 07:39 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-02 02:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 11:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-02 09:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 18:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-09 05:52 +0200
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-10-09 00:09 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Hello Thomas <tsp2opt@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 07:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-08 07:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-10-08 12:36 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-08 22:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-10-08 15:33 -0600
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-09 05:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft A Nony Mouse <abc@cef.ghi> - 2016-10-09 00:14 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 17:26 +0000
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 11:48 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-17 12:54 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 12:47 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 20:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 00:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 22:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-18 06:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-18 07:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 03:46 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 08:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-20 01:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 08:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-20 20:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 04:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-22 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 05:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:42 +0000
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-23 23:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 17:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-24 22:06 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 00:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 13:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 16:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-25 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 18:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-26 09:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 07:35 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:27 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-27 06:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 12:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 21:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-26 01:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 00:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 14:07 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 13:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 17:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 02:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 05:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 19:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 03:58 -0400
Page 5 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 21 Next page →
| From | Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9odmkd.sfr.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #394064 |
Alex W. <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 28/09/2016 04:23, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 27.09.2016 11:02, schrieb Alex W.:
>>
>>>>>> The text is about the Austrian Empire. In the German language the
>>>>>> citizens of Austria are called 'Österreicher' (Austrians).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Deutscher' (German) means 'citizen of Germany' only. But meant in the
>>>>>> English version is 'Speaker of the German language'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the German language has no word for 'Speaker of the German
>>>>>> language', since obviously 'Speaker of the German language' would
>>>>>> address the speaker himself.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Der deutschsprachige".
>>>>
>>>> No!
>>>>
>>>> There is actually no Word for what you try to express. The sum of all
>>>> speakers of German could be called 'Deutscher', if that is what you want
>>>> to say.
>>>
>>> You claimed that there was no word in German for "speaker of the German
>>> language". I corrected you.
>>>
>>
>> The word does not mean 'person who speaks German' but
>> 'Film/book/newspaper in German language'.
>
> Schwachsinn. "Der deutschsprachige Zeitgenosse/Freund/Mitbürger" ist
> genauso gutes Deutsch wie "die deutschsprachige Zeitung". Beides geht.
> Beides ist normales, korrektes, umgangssprachliches Deutsch.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But it is a very unusual idea, since Germans think mainly in
>>>> territories. So people from a certain region are named after that
>>>> region.
>>>>
>>>> E.g. 'Pole' means citizen of Poland.
>>>>
>>>> If a former citizen of Poland gets German citizenship he is called
>>>> Deutscher, because Germany ( Deutschland) is a territory. And if you
>>>> settle there, you are named after this territory.
>>>>
>>>> For instance soccer hero Lukas Podolski is regarded as German, even if
>>>> he stems from Poland.
>>>
>>> Podolski, to the German nationalist, was always a German. His
>>> grandparents were "Reichsbürger", meaning they were ethnic German --
>>> Schlesier, to be precise.
>>
>>
>> Podolski stems from Poland and was born in Gliwice.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lukas_Podolski
>>
>> "Podolski was born to Waldemar Podolski and Krystyna Podolska, a former
>> member of the Poland national handball team in the Silesian industrial
>> town of Gliwice (near Katowice), Poland."
>
> Gliwice hieß früher Gleiwitz.
> Gleiwitz war früher eine deutschsprachige Stadt, bevölkert von
> Deutschstämmigen.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Silesians were not Germans, but Silesia was a part of the KuK
>> Monarchy, which was annexed by Prussia.
>>
>> So the people in Silesia were a mixture of Bohemians, Polish, Austrians
>> and Sudets. All of these people had been part of AUSTRIA!
>>
>> The Prussians had conquered Silesia, which did not make Silesians ethnic
>> Germans.
>
> Schlesien war seit 1742 Preußisch, und damit seit 1871 deutsch.
>
>
>>
>> Similar the Sudets were legal citizens of the Czech Republic and had
>> Austrian roots, since Bohemia was also a part of Austria.
>>
>> Gliwice, btw, had the German name 'Gleiwitz'
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliwice
>>
>> It was the town were WW II began.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
>>
>> (Nazi false flag 'terror attack')
>
> None of this is relevant to those who think in terms of culture and
> ethnicity rather than nationality.
>
> Even the Federal Republic of Germany had policies along those lines,
> accepting without question or test (and issuing German citizenship) many
> hundreds of thousands of ethnic Volga Germans, Siebenbürger Germans and
> anyone else who claimed German ancestry.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Queen on the other hand is not regarded as German, since she lives
>>>> in England, (despite that e.g. Mountbatten means 'Battenberg')
>>>
>>> Which may be true for most people today, but it is not correct for those
>>> who think in racial terms, or those who subscribe to the idea of
>>> Grossdeutschland. It was not true for Hitler or those who believed in
>>> his screwy ideology. They thought in terms of culture and language, and
>>> they made no difference between an Austrian, a Volga German or a
>>> Sudetendeutscher.
>>
>>
>> It's certainly interesting to hear about 'Grossdeutschland' from an
>> Englishman.
>
> Read some history.
>
> Then get back to us.
Maybe he doesn't understand how many of today's Brits have ethnic German
ancestors?
He like all to many people today confound the words ethnicity and
nationality.
>>>>>> This is similar to 'English', which is also a language and a
>>>>>> nationality. So a Canadian would not say 'English' about himself, but
>>>>>> 'Canadian', even if he speaks English.
>>>>>
>>>>> But until very recently indeed, it was quite common for a Briton to use
>>>>> "England" and "English" when referring to the whole of the United
>>>>> Kingdom. In fact, this long-standing habit of conflating England and
>>>>> Britain is at the root of our current national confusion and search for
>>>>> a specific English identity distinct from the British one.
>>>>>
>>>> Great Britten is a union of England, Wales and Scottland.
>>>>
>>>> Scotsmen always said they are Scottish. (People from Wales I don't know
>>>> enough to make a statement.)
>>>
>>> Which was not really an issue back when "Mein Kampf" was written.
I thought the Welshman problem appeared briefly during WW2 and quickly put
down by Churchill?
>> Yes, maybe. But that was a comment about your statement, not about 'My
>> Struggle'. You wrote the phrase "...But until very recently indeed, .."
>
> Which is quite correct.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> It is somehow possible, but 'old school'. Usually you use the plural, if
>>>> you want to address people from a certain nation.
>>>>
>>>> ('Die Engländer trinken gerne Tee').
>>>>
>>>> The German article 'der' is more than the English 'the' specifically
>>>> male.
>>>>
>>>> So 'Der Engländer.. ' -meant as an example for a multitude of people-
>>>> means a multitude of males from England.
>>>>
>>>> 'Die Engländerin.. ' means females only.
>>>>
>>>> But the specific article (der,die, das) is not that often used for
>>>> descriptions of groups.
>>>
>>> It is quite acceptable as a phrase.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it is acceptable. But you can accept almost everything, if you are
>> able to identify, what the speaker wants.
>>
>> But 'acceptable' is not exactly the same as 'well written'.
>>
>> The book 'Mein Kampf' is more of the type 'acceptable'. To read it is
>> actually a pain in the a***.
>>
>> After two pages you get hopelessly sedated and have to leave the book
>> for an hour or two, get some fresh air and a cup of coffee.
>>
>> But this is the quality of the German version alone.
>>
>> The English version is MUCH better written and much easier to read.
>
> Which can be said about a great many books originally written in German.
> I recommend you try reading Thomas Mann in the German and then the
> English translation.
>
>
>
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvVPdyYeaQU
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e534a2F68fdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #394140 |
On 29/09/2016 04:10, Bob Officer wrote: > Alex W. <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> On 28/09/2016 04:23, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am 27.09.2016 11:02, schrieb Alex W.: >>> >>>>> The Queen on the other hand is not regarded as German, since she lives >>>>> in England, (despite that e.g. Mountbatten means 'Battenberg') >>>> >>>> Which may be true for most people today, but it is not correct for those >>>> who think in racial terms, or those who subscribe to the idea of >>>> Grossdeutschland. It was not true for Hitler or those who believed in >>>> his screwy ideology. They thought in terms of culture and language, and >>>> they made no difference between an Austrian, a Volga German or a >>>> Sudetendeutscher. >>> >>> >>> It's certainly interesting to hear about 'Grossdeutschland' from an >>> Englishman. >> >> Read some history. >> >> Then get back to us. > > Maybe he doesn't understand how many of today's Brits have ethnic German > ancestors? > > He like all to many people today confound the words ethnicity and > nationality. He not only confuses ethnicity and nationality, he insists on evaluating the piece of racist cant that is "Mein Kampf" from a modern perspective, totally neglecting the fact that Hitler and many of his contemporaries quite simply did not think in today's terms. Race (and to a lesser degree culture) were paramount in their thinking. Nationality was largely irrelevant to them, at best an obstacle to the unity of a racial and cultural entity that was to be overcome and eradicated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 08:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e53p84Fal8sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #394198 |
Am 29.09.2016 02:07, schrieb Alex W.: > On 29/09/2016 04:10, Bob Officer wrote: >> Alex W. <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 28/09/2016 04:23, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> Am 27.09.2016 11:02, schrieb Alex W.: >>>> > > >>>>>> The Queen on the other hand is not regarded as German, since she >>>>>> lives >>>>>> in England, (despite that e.g. Mountbatten means 'Battenberg') >>>>> >>>>> Which may be true for most people today, but it is not correct for >>>>> those >>>>> who think in racial terms, or those who subscribe to the idea of >>>>> Grossdeutschland. It was not true for Hitler or those who believed in >>>>> his screwy ideology. They thought in terms of culture and language, >>>>> and >>>>> they made no difference between an Austrian, a Volga German or a >>>>> Sudetendeutscher. >>>> >>>> >>>> It's certainly interesting to hear about 'Grossdeutschland' from an >>>> Englishman. >>> >>> Read some history. >>> >>> Then get back to us. >> >> Maybe he doesn't understand how many of today's Brits have ethnic German >> ancestors? >> >> He like all to many people today confound the words ethnicity and >> nationality. > > He not only confuses ethnicity and nationality, he insists on evaluating > the piece of racist cant that is "Mein Kampf" from a modern perspective, > totally neglecting the fact that Hitler and many of his contemporaries > quite simply did not think in today's terms. Race (and to a lesser > degree culture) were paramount in their thinking. Nationality was > largely irrelevant to them, at best an obstacle to the unity of a racial > and cultural entity that was to be overcome and eradicated. The idea of a 'German race' or 'Aryan race' is British bullshit and promoted by Nazi theoretician Houston Steward Chamberlain. Maybe its just coincidence, that had the same name as Neville Chamberlain, who signed the Munich treaty. This allowed the Nazis, in violation of international laws, to annex the Czech Republic. Anyhow: My assumption is, the book 'Mein Kampf' was not written in German and not by Hitler. Usually Hitler would would have to face death penalty for his armed revolt and attempted coup. But instead he was allowed to write his pamphlet in prison. To make this task easier, he had enough paper, a typewriter and a private secretary. This is the official story. Only the story can't be possibly true. Among the various reasons is the large amount of 800 pages, which would be stunning productivity, especially if written in prison. The other reasons are: the book does not match the alleged history of its author. E.g. the school system described is that of Germany and the parliament described is that of England. The entire text in German looks like a poor translation of the much better written English version. Also questionable is the general philosophical content, since Hitler was a homeless painter in Austria, with no higher education. In WWI he got injured eyes and could not read in hospital. After WWI came relatively soon his attempted coup. So no time for Plato and Hegel. But from were came his knowledge? So we can safely assume, that someone else had written the book (a ghost-writer). This seems to be common practise with MI6 spies and they are often presented as 'Artists'. (The required art is that provided by 'Q'.) The 'art factory' would than be some spy-schools like the Tavistock Institute, where the apprentices can learn to write scripts. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 06:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e4ubohF1aroU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #393825 |
Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: >>>> >>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a >>>> translation into German from an English original. >>>> >>>> >>>> TH >>> >>> You are insane. >> >> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can >> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which >> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. >> >> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. >> >> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience >> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in >> another forum. >> >> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the >> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so >> forth. >> >> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - >> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be >> good enough. > > Your English is not good enough for this. > English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far from being perfect. But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? Do you have one at all? On the other hand you are correct and linguistic analysis would require skills, which I do not posses. But I can show you the principle and show you, what would be useful to compare. I can show this at any give page of 'My Struggle' / 'Mein Kampf'. You simply give me a page number (the book has about 800 pages) and I take this page. (if the page is blank or almost empty, I take the next full page) TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 19:06 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e4ur4pF4pcjU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #393947 |
On 27/09/2016 14:43, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: > >>>>> >>>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a >>>>> translation into German from an English original. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> TH >>>> >>>> You are insane. >>> >>> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can >>> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which >>> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. >>> >>> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. >>> >>> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience >>> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in >>> another forum. >>> >>> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the >>> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so >>> forth. >>> >>> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - >>> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be >>> good enough. >> >> Your English is not good enough for this. >> > English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in > English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far > from being perfect. > > But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? > Do you have one at all? I am bilingual in English and German. I am also fluent in French, and I have had 6 years of both Latin and Greek. I also have a university degree in history and languages. Enough for you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 05:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-93C181.05082627092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #393954 |
In article <e4ur4pF4pcjU2@mid.individual.net>, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 27/09/2016 14:43, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: > > > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a > >>>>> translation into German from an English original. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> TH > >>>> > >>>> You are insane. > >>> > >>> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can > >>> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which > >>> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. > >>> > >>> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. > >>> > >>> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience > >>> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in > >>> another forum. > >>> > >>> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the > >>> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so > >>> forth. > >>> > >>> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - > >>> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be > >>> good enough. > >> > >> Your English is not good enough for this. > >> > > English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in > > English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far > > from being perfect. > > > > But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? > > Do you have one at all? > > I am bilingual in English and German. > I am also fluent in French, and I have had 6 years of both Latin and Greek. > > I also have a university degree in history and languages. > > Enough for you? Certainly more than enough for me. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 20:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <793mub1dlmslhhvrs5gvk6a6mpovdpfnub@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #393954 |
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:06:33 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On 27/09/2016 14:43, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: >> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a >>>>>> translation into German from an English original. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> TH >>>>> >>>>> You are insane. >>>> >>>> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can >>>> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which >>>> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. >>>> >>>> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. >>>> >>>> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience >>>> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in >>>> another forum. >>>> >>>> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the >>>> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so >>>> forth. >>>> >>>> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - >>>> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be >>>> good enough. >>> >>> Your English is not good enough for this. >>> >> English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in >> English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far >> from being perfect. >> >> But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? >> Do you have one at all? > >I am bilingual in English and German. >I am also fluent in French, and I have had 6 years of both Latin and Greek. > >I also have a university degree in history and languages. > >Enough for you? > No. Never enough languages! You made me think of John Cleese in "A Fish Called Wanda"... and if you don't get the reference, well hie thee to the internets and fetch said movie pronto. Latin... fuck me. Why? Other than understanding things like "post hoc ergo propter hoc", was it actually a choice? Greek... well come on. Everyone should know Greek if only for the increased understanding of all the big words in English, like onomatopoeia. Plus, "ai pithixou" is so much more poetic as "Go jump yourself" than the colloquial "go fuck yourself", non? French is a messed up language. Beautiful, but messed up. I want to learn Spanish; I sadly didn't take the opportunity to do so while I lived in Texas, but it's just such a great sounding language that it's still on my bucket list. And Mandarin! Because it might be nice to understand how we're being slagged. I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a compiler.... <cue nerd groans> -- Cheers, Dreamer AA 2306 "If God listened to the prayers of men, all men would quickly have perished: for they are forever praying for evil against one another." Epicurus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 01:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nsf5nb$1h6t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #394065 |
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in > polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a > compiler.... <cue nerd groans> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 23:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsfeum$tp3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #394069 |
Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > >> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> > > To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 15:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nsgm5u$1nu6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #394082 |
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: > Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >> >>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >>> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >>> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >> >> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. > > Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... Yes. COBALled together in one tick. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 16:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ii8oubtbj6qij15vcn9rsd7kq8mp08fvpa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #394124 |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: > >> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>> >>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >>>> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >>>> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>> >>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >> >> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... > >Yes. COBALled together in one tick. That's a lot of Smalltalk from the cheap seats. The SQL to this conversation is going to be what... a Postscript? -- Cheers, Dreamer AA 2306 "If God listened to the prayers of men, all men would quickly have perished: for they are forever praying for evil against one another." Epicurus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 00:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nshlop$1bv2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #394161 |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:06:34 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >>On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: >> >>> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them >>>>> in polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or >>>>> a compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>>> >>>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >>> >>> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... >> >>Yes. COBALled together in one tick. > > That's a lot of Smalltalk from the cheap seats. The SQL to this > conversation is going to be what... a Postscript? I suggest you ask Ada. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 00:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsi5s9$4cf$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #394161 |
Le 2016-09-28 à 16:06, Dreamer In Colore a écrit : > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: >> >>> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >>>>> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >>>>> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>>> >>>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >>> >>> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... >> >> Yes. COBALled together in one tick. > > That's a lot of Smalltalk from the cheap seats. The SQL to this > conversation is going to be what... a Postscript? You're too judgmental. We're all trying to be objective, see? -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 00:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsi5p3$4cf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #394124 |
Le 2016-09-28 à 11:04, Smiler a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: > >> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>> >>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >>>> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >>>> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>> >>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >> >> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... > > Yes. COBALled together in one tick. "COBAL"??? Your stack has overflown. Please reboot! -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 15:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nsjd3p$1rth$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #394210 |
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:37:04 -0400, Olrik wrote: > Le 2016-09-28 à 11:04, Smiler a écrit : >> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: >> >>> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them >>>>> in polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or >>>>> a compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>>> >>>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >>> >>> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... >> >> Yes. COBALled together in one tick. > > "COBAL"??? Your stack has overflown. Please reboot! ^H^H^H^H^H COBOL! -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 23:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsknuj$rc0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #394265 |
Le 2016-09-29 à 11:48, Smiler a écrit : > On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:37:04 -0400, Olrik wrote: > >> Le 2016-09-28 à 11:04, Smiler a écrit : >>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:55:15 -0400, Olrik wrote: >>> >>>> Le 2016-09-27 à 21:17, Smiler a écrit : >>>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:28:56 -0400, Dreamer In Colore wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them >>>>>> in polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or >>>>>> a compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>>>> >>>>> To assemble that many languages, I C is more than BASIC. >>>> >>>> Pffftt... That was a swift judgment... >>> >>> Yes. COBALled together in one tick. >> >> "COBAL"??? Your stack has overflown. Please reboot! > > ^H^H^H^H^H COBOL! > Correction handled with Grace. Many thanks! -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 11:50 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e50m02Fim9pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #394065 |
On 28/09/2016 10:28, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:06:33 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On 27/09/2016 14:43, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a >>>>>>> translation into German from an English original. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TH >>>>>> >>>>>> You are insane. >>>>> >>>>> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can >>>>> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which >>>>> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. >>>>> >>>>> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. >>>>> >>>>> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience >>>>> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in >>>>> another forum. >>>>> >>>>> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the >>>>> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so >>>>> forth. >>>>> >>>>> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - >>>>> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be >>>>> good enough. >>>> >>>> Your English is not good enough for this. >>>> >>> English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in >>> English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far >>> from being perfect. >>> >>> But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? >>> Do you have one at all? >> >> I am bilingual in English and German. >> I am also fluent in French, and I have had 6 years of both Latin and Greek. >> >> I also have a university degree in history and languages. >> >> Enough for you? >> > > No. Never enough languages! > > You made me think of John Cleese in "A Fish Called Wanda"... and if > you don't get the reference, well hie thee to the internets and fetch > said movie pronto. I do know -- and love -- said film. Oddly, I have tried Cleese's technique on my SO, without any result other than confused looks. She requires other approaches.... > > Latin... fuck me. Why? Other than understanding things like "post hoc > ergo propter hoc", was it actually a choice? It was not a choice at the time. I have, however, come to greatly appreciate it. Latin is an excellent basis for learning all sorts of languages, not least all the Romance tongues. > > Greek... well come on. Everyone should know Greek if only for the > increased understanding of all the big words in English, like > onomatopoeia. Plus, "ai pithixou" is so much more poetic as "Go jump > yourself" than the colloquial "go fuck yourself", non? A phrase with which current German tourists to Greece will be all too familiar... :-) > > French is a messed up language. Beautiful, but messed up. Their spelling is way more haphazard than English... > > I want to learn Spanish; I sadly didn't take the opportunity to do so > while I lived in Texas, but it's just such a great sounding language > that it's still on my bucket list. And Mandarin! Because it might be > nice to understand how we're being slagged. Aesthetically, I prefer Portuguese or Italian to Spanish, but each to his own. I am also wary of the significant differences between the different versions of Spanish: my Castilian sister-in-law, for example, found it almost impossible to understand my Colombian cleaner ... even thought they both spoke Spanish (nominally). As for the Chinese, Mandarin is only *one* of their languages. Learn Mandarin, and you may find yourself being slagged off in Cantonese or Hakka.... > > I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in > polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a > compiler.... <cue nerd groans> > So you're claiming you can order a beer in Python and tell someone to go perform anatomically impossible congress with themselves in C++? Impressive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 22:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-3108C4.22300927092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #394076 |
In article <e50m02Fim9pU1@mid.individual.net>, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 28/09/2016 10:28, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:06:33 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> On 27/09/2016 14:43, Thomas Heger wrote: > >>> Am 26.09.2016 09:56, schrieb Alex W.: > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm also quite certain, that the book 'Mein Kampf' is actually a > >>>>>>> translation into German from an English original. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> TH > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You are insane. > >>>>> > >>>>> Well, maybe (but most likely not). It is irrelevant anyhow, since I can > >>>>> prove, that 'My Struggle' (in English) was the original version, which > >>>>> was only translated by Hess and Hitler. > >>>>> > >>>>> This would require to compare a piece of text from both versions. > >>>>> > >>>>> You can take actually any piece you like, but for reasons of convenience > >>>>> I take a fragment, which I have used recently to show this effect in > >>>>> another forum. > >>>>> > >>>>> So I take a piece of text from the English version and the same from the > >>>>> German one and compare them for style, linguistic errors, content and so > >>>>> forth. > >>>>> > >>>>> Since I'm German, my first language is German and I can - of course - > >>>>> understand German quite well. My English is a little less, but should be > >>>>> good enough. > >>>> > >>>> Your English is not good enough for this. > >>>> > >>> English is a second language for me. I can talk, read and write in > >>> English quite fluently. But, as a matter of fact, that is still far > >>> from being perfect. > >>> > >>> But if you complain about my English, than how is your second language? > >>> Do you have one at all? > >> > >> I am bilingual in English and German. > >> I am also fluent in French, and I have had 6 years of both Latin and Greek. > >> > >> I also have a university degree in history and languages. > >> > >> Enough for you? > >> > > > > No. Never enough languages! > > > > You made me think of John Cleese in "A Fish Called Wanda"... and if > > you don't get the reference, well hie thee to the internets and fetch > > said movie pronto. > > I do know -- and love -- said film. > > Oddly, I have tried Cleese's technique on my SO, without any result > other than confused looks. > > She requires other approaches.... > > > > > > Latin... fuck me. Why? Other than understanding things like "post hoc > > ergo propter hoc", was it actually a choice? > > It was not a choice at the time. > I have, however, come to greatly appreciate it. Latin is an excellent > basis for learning all sorts of languages, not least all the Romance > tongues. One of my favorite college classes was the Latin roots of English words. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 14:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nsglqq$1nu6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #394076 |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:50:55 +1000, Alex W. wrote: > On 28/09/2016 10:28, Dreamer In Colore wrote: <snip> >> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >> >> > So you're claiming you can order a beer in Python and tell someone to go > perform anatomically impossible congress with themselves in C++? > > Impressive. To perform anatomically impossible congress with themselves in C++ requires repeated recursion, leading to a stack overflow. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 16:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9n8oubtm29g5k95th4rpdq1tguqele0fp3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #394123 |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:50:55 +1000, Alex W. wrote: > >> On 28/09/2016 10:28, Dreamer In Colore wrote: > ><snip> > >>> I'm fluent in at least fifteen languages; however, I don't use them in >>> polite company. They require either the use of an interpreter or a >>> compiler.... <cue nerd groans> >>> >>> >> So you're claiming you can order a beer in Python and tell someone to go >> perform anatomically impossible congress with themselves in C++? >> >> Impressive. > >To perform anatomically impossible congress with themselves in C++ >requires repeated recursion, leading to a stack overflow. That's not in the design spec. Nowhere was frequency specified, but I will say that I liked the overflow pun. -- Cheers, Dreamer AA 2306 "If God listened to the prayers of men, all men would quickly have perished: for they are forever praying for evil against one another." Epicurus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web