Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392061 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-14 03:58 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 416 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Normal Human <NH@....> - 2016-09-12 08:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 15:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-11 16:28 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-12 00:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 07:31 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 12:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 05:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 08:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 07:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 14:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 19:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 12:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 22:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-12 22:18 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 06:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 23:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 22:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 20:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 01:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-15 11:29 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 20:44 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-16 06:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 20:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 19:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-16 10:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-17 11:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 16:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 11:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 09:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 03:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-18 20:56 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 16:11 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 11:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 12:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 19:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 09:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-22 00:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 03:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 18:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 02:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-22 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 10:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 12:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-23 14:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 10:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 05:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 19:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 17:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 06:44 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-25 22:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-26 17:56 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 23:09 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 20:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 10:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 03:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 11:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 20:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-28 04:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-29 10:07 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-29 08:04 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-27 19:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-27 05:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-27 20:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 01:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 23:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 15:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-29 00:03 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 00:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 00:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-29 15:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 23:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-28 11:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-27 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-28 14:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 10:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 16:08 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 08:53 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 17:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-20 09:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 12:05 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 20:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 23:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 00:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 11:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 23:38 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 22:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 04:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 21:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-21 16:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:11 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 08:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-21 23:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 17:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 22:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 12:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 02:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 22:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-22 22:25 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 04:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 18:20 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 09:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 18:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 10:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-24 04:29 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 17:29 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-23 23:20 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-23 16:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-23 15:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-24 16:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 15:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 21:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-26 01:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-22 18:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-21 17:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 17:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-22 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 17:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 10:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 11:26 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 04:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 22:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-22 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 09:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-23 03:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-24 12:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-24 16:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-25 11:59 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-25 13:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-25 23:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 10:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 04:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 14:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 23:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-27 10:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 09:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-20 20:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 21:47 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-17 16:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 18:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 00:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 23:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 20:06 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 20:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 23:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 12:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 05:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:13 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-09-22 11:51 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-22 11:04 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-22 14:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 16:04 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 11:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-01 20:26 -0500
To A Atheism The Science Of Language Is Rrelativity "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-19 15:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 22:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 18:59 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 00:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-19 17:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 08:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 12:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-13 07:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 18:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 21:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 06:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 02:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 06:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 12:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 15:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:29 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 14:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-15 19:37 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-14 01:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 19:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 14:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 23:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 06:40 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-16 18:57 -0500
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:15 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:33 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:37 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:05 -0700
Atheism is Witchcraft "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 10:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 14:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 09:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-13 17:21 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 03:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 20:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 20:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-14 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 21:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 09:32 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 17:38 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 23:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 18:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 22:48 +0200
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-09-15 15:02 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-16 01:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-18 13:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-18 21:01 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 17:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 23:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 21:38 -0700
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-19 23:37 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-19 23:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 15:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 10:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 18:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-20 15:14 -0400
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-20 13:46 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 20:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 17:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 21:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 16:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 16:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-17 19:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 06:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 23:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-18 20:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-18 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-30 06:33 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-29 23:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 02:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 11:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-01 10:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-30 02:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 11:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-30 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-30 23:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-01 08:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-01 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 07:39 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-02 02:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 11:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-10-02 09:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 18:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-09 05:52 +0200
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-10-09 00:09 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Hello Thomas <tsp2opt@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 07:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-08 07:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-10-08 12:36 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-08 22:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-10-08 15:33 -0600
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-09 05:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is NOT Witchcraft A Nony Mouse <abc@cef.ghi> - 2016-10-09 00:14 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 17:26 +0000
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 11:48 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-17 12:54 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 12:47 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 20:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 15:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 00:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 22:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-18 06:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-18 07:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 03:46 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 00:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-19 08:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-19 15:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-20 01:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-20 08:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-20 20:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 04:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-22 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-23 05:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-24 02:42 +0000
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-23 23:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 17:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-24 22:06 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 00:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 13:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-25 16:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-25 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 18:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-26 09:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-26 07:35 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-27 06:27 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-27 06:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-25 12:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-25 21:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-26 01:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 00:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-25 14:07 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 13:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 17:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 02:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 05:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 19:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 03:58 -0400
Page 11 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 21 Next page →
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 12:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrra8q$sil$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #393019 |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:32 +0000, Ted&Alice wrote: > Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:22:28 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am 19.09.2016 22:19, schrieb Smiler: >>> >>>>>>> Prophets are rare exceptions from a rule, that generally would not >>>>>>> include direct contact or interference. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the >>>>>> bible. I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within >>>>>> the next 24 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its >>>>> usefulness. >>>> >>>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>>> useless. >>>> >>>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather >>>>> forecast. >>>> >>>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>>> numbers? >>> >>> The bible does not make predictions, you did. >> >> So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? >> >>> You wrote: >>> [Quote] >>> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next >>> 24 >>> hours." >>> [\Quote] >> >> Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. >> In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. >> Prove me wrong. >> >>> You seem to confuse 'prophet' with 'fortune teller'. >> >> Specify the difference. >> >>> A typical prophet would be Mohammed or Buddha. And what they did not >>> do, was predicting the weather. >> >> But they probably predicted many other things. > > From what I read, Buddha wasn't even into that kinda shit. I'm not that well informed about Buddha, but understand that he was more of a teacher than a prophet. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 05:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e4ec9mF6bfmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #393016 |
Am 20.09.2016 01:56, schrieb Smiler: >>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the bible. >>>>> I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>>> hours. >>>> >>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its usefulness. >>> >>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>> useless. >>> >>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather forecast. >>> >>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>> numbers? >> >> The bible does not make predictions, you did. > > So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? > >> You wrote: >> [Quote] >> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >> hours." >> [\Quote] > > Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. > In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. > Prove me wrong. Don't want.... A statement like yours is true, because you failed to limit its validity. E.g. you have not specified, what 'rain' actually means. Does it also cover 'marshmallow rain'? And you have not specified the location and the time. So you made a valid prediction, which is of no value whatsoever. The value is higher, if the prediction is more specific. And very high would be the numbers of the lottery of next week (or sports results, political events or similar). This is so, because foreknowledge would allow successful bets and that could be rather profitable. >> You seem to confuse 'prophet' with 'fortune teller'. > > Specify the difference. Predictions is, what scientists do (and fortune tellers). Prophets are teachers. And they would never bet, while fortune tellers actually try to create foreknowledge to make bets more profitable. >> A typical prophet would be Mohammed or Buddha. And what they did not >> do, was predicting the weather. > > But they probably predicted many other things. > No. A prophecy requires foreknowledge, while fortune tellers use means like tea-leaves, Tarot cards or chicken bones. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 14:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nru4mk$18bp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #393169 |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:14:55 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 20.09.2016 01:56, schrieb Smiler: > >>>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the >>>>>> bible. I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within >>>>>> the next 24 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its >>>>> usefulness. >>>> >>>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>>> useless. >>>> >>>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather >>>>> forecast. >>>> >>>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>>> numbers? >>> >>> The bible does not make predictions, you did. >> >> So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? Thanks for admitting you lied. >>> You wrote: >>> [Quote] >>> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next >>> 24 >>> hours." >>> [\Quote] >> >> Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. >> In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. >> Prove me wrong. > > Don't want.... Your cowardice is noted. > A statement like yours is true, because you failed to limit its > validity. E.g. you have not specified, what 'rain' actually means. Exactly as bible prophesies do. > Does it also cover 'marshmallow rain'? WTF is that? Is that like the supposed 'manna from heaven' that the Israelites ate whilst on their supposed exodus? > And you have not specified the location Exactly as bible prophesies do. > and the time. Within the next 24 hours isn't specifying a time, in your world? > So you made a valid prediction, which is of no value whatsoever. Exactly as bible prophesies do. > The value is higher, if the prediction is more specific. Indeed. Please point out that sort of specific prediction/prophesy in the bible. > And very high would be the numbers of the lottery of next week (or > sports results, political events or similar). No argument there, but nothing like that appears in the bible. > This is so, because foreknowledge would allow successful bets and that > could be rather profitable. Indeed. >>> You seem to confuse 'prophet' with 'fortune teller'. >> >> Specify the difference. > > Predictions is, what scientists do (and fortune tellers). Prophets are > teachers. So, in your world prophesies (that _is_ what prophets do) aren't predictions. >And they would never bet, while fortune tellers actually try > to create foreknowledge to make bets more profitable. You've no idea about fortune tellers or gambling, have you? >>> A typical prophet would be Mohammed or Buddha. And what they did not >>> do, was predicting the weather. >> >> But they probably predicted many other things. >> > No. A prophecy requires foreknowledge, Like the foreknowledge that it will rain somewhere in the world within the following 24 hours? Thanks for making me a prophet. And, unlike biblical prophets, my prophesies come true. > while fortune tellers use means like tea-leaves, Tarot cards or chicken > bones. You appear to be using bullshit. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 10:13 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e4gm0hFnbtsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #393169 |
On 21/09/2016 13:14, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 20.09.2016 01:56, schrieb Smiler: > >>>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the bible. >>>>>> I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>>>> hours. >>>>> >>>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its usefulness. >>>> >>>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>>> useless. >>>> >>>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather forecast. >>>> >>>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>>> numbers? >>> >>> The bible does not make predictions, you did. >> >> So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? >> >>> You wrote: >>> [Quote] >>> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>> hours." >>> [\Quote] >> >> Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. >> In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. >> Prove me wrong. > > Don't want.... > > A statement like yours is true, because you failed to limit its > validity. E.g. you have not specified, what 'rain' actually means. > > Does it also cover 'marshmallow rain'? > > And you have not specified the location and the time. > > So you made a valid prediction, which is of no value whatsoever. > > The value is higher, if the prediction is more specific. Bravo. And that is precisely the problem with biblical prophesy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 04:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <s147ublse5skohholpeoaggt2uubek154b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #393274 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:13:02 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> in alt.atheism with message-id <e4gm0hFnbtsU1@mid.individual.net> wrote: >On 21/09/2016 13:14, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 20.09.2016 01:56, schrieb Smiler: >> >>>>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the bible. >>>>>>> I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>>>>> hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its usefulness. >>>>> >>>>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>>>> useless. >>>>> >>>>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather forecast. >>>>> >>>>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>>>> numbers? >>>> >>>> The bible does not make predictions, you did. >>> >>> So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? >>> >>>> You wrote: >>>> [Quote] >>>> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>> hours." >>>> [\Quote] >>> >>> Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. >>> In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. >>> Prove me wrong. >> >> Don't want.... >> >> A statement like yours is true, because you failed to limit its >> validity. E.g. you have not specified, what 'rain' actually means. >> >> Does it also cover 'marshmallow rain'? >> >> And you have not specified the location and the time. >> >> So you made a valid prediction, which is of no value whatsoever. >> >> The value is higher, if the prediction is more specific. > >Bravo. > >And that is precisely the problem with biblical prophesy. > Which seems to only work in retrospect. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor OBastard. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pv28ubh1cpb95m040q67ho027uh4qleeep@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #393306 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 04:03:59 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:13:02 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> in >alt.atheism with message-id <e4gm0hFnbtsU1@mid.individual.net> wrote: > >>On 21/09/2016 13:14, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am 20.09.2016 01:56, schrieb Smiler: >>> >>>>>>>> I can make biblical type prophesies as accurate as any in the bible. >>>>>>>> I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>>>>>> hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, yes. But the value of a prophecy increases with its usefulness. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do tell of a useful biblical prophesy, one not so vague as to be >>>>>> useless. >>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are able to correctly predict the lottery numbers, you will >>>>>>> certainly get more for your prophecies than for your weather forecast. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where did the bible make a prediction as specific as the lottery >>>>>> numbers? >>>>> >>>>> The bible does not make predictions, you did. >>>> >>>> So "The meek shall inherit the Earth" isn't a prediction in your world? >>>> >>>>> You wrote: >>>>> [Quote] >>>>> "..I prophesy, with 100% certainty, that it will rain within the next 24 >>>>> hours." >>>>> [\Quote] >>>> >>>> Yep. No guesswork needed. It will again rain within the next 24 hours. >>>> In fact, it will rain every day, for the remainder of this year. >>>> Prove me wrong. >>> >>> Don't want.... >>> >>> A statement like yours is true, because you failed to limit its >>> validity. E.g. you have not specified, what 'rain' actually means. >>> >>> Does it also cover 'marshmallow rain'? >>> >>> And you have not specified the location and the time. >>> >>> So you made a valid prediction, which is of no value whatsoever. >>> >>> The value is higher, if the prediction is more specific. >> >>Bravo. >> >>And that is precisely the problem with biblical prophesy. >> > >Which seems to only work in retrospect. The biblical story is one of faith, not sight. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 11:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Theism is Witchcraft |
| Message-ID | <aaa-6DEB5A.11044122092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #393354 |
In article <pv28ubh1cpb95m040q67ho027uh4qleeep@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > The biblical story is one of faith, not sight. Exactly like the stories of all other religions!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 14:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bi78ub94jeicmih891n328jbusqttgr792@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #393354 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:51:54 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <pv28ubh1cpb95m040q67ho027uh4qleeep@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>And that is precisely the problem with biblical prophesy. >>> >> >>Which seems to only work in retrospect. > >The biblical story is one of faith, not sight. > There isn't much reality there either. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor OBastard. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 04:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <r8kstblnfaia3pkea8p0l6b9kd8nm1b0km@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #392709 |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:52:07 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> in alt.atheism with message-id <e45alqFmn1U1@mid.individual.net> wrote: >Am 17.09.2016 18:28, schrieb Smiler: > >>> "The Real Mount Sinai Found!" >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOLnXkP5i2c >>> >>> "Forbbiden Pictures Revealed Saudi Arabia Mt. Sinai" >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSuKgz3LweE >> >> Merely unevidenced opinion. >> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> And, if true, it makes the bible wrong. >> > >Religious scripts cannot be wrong, since they do not pretend to be true. Of course they do. > >So the bible is not a book about real history, even if it refers to >historic events. Agreed. > >E.g. Eva was not made from the rib of her husband Adam. > >The story has to be understood in a more symbolic way. Meaning whatever the reader wants it to mean. > > >Such YouTube videos of amateurs about own findings, on the other hand, >attempt to be true, but are often not. > >So if someone finds something interesting somewhere remote, than the >best strategy would be, to research this place independently and with >more professional means. > >But I would doubt, that the Saudis have great interest in research of >early Jewish remains in their country. > >Most likely they would try to divert attention from such places and >would not allow access to them. > > >TH > > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor OBastard. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 16:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e47l80FhsumU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #392804 |
Am 18.09.2016 10:33, schrieb Attila <: >> Religious scripts cannot be wrong, since they do not pretend to be true. > > Of course they do. > >> >> So the bible is not a book about real history, even if it refers to >> historic events. > > Agreed. > >> >> E.g. Eva was not made from the rib of her husband Adam. >> >> The story has to be understood in a more symbolic way. > > Meaning whatever the reader wants it to mean. No! Whatever meaning the AUTHOR wants it to have. Religious scripts should be understood in the context of religious initiation. Our current use of printed material as kind of entertainment was - of course - unknown in ancient times. One reason: printing did not exist. Everything was carefully written on papyrus, pergament or similar. And that was very expensive. Another problem: most people could not read. And even if they could read, they would have trouble with Greek, Hebrew and Latin. So such books were not meant to be read by common people, but by members of some kind of monastery or church. And in case they had problems with understanding, they could always ask somebody. And those superiors would tell them, how to interpret the text. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 15:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrmc1c$12gk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #392829 |
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:04:43 +0200, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 18.09.2016 10:33, schrieb Attila <: > >>> Religious scripts cannot be wrong, since they do not pretend to be >>> true. >> >> Of course they do. >> >>> So the bible is not a book about real history, even if it refers to >>> historic events. >> >> Agreed. >> >>> E.g. Eva was not made from the rib of her husband Adam. >>> >>> The story has to be understood in a more symbolic way. >> >> Meaning whatever the reader wants it to mean. > > No! > > Whatever meaning the AUTHOR wants it to have. The authors made it so unclear that it means whatever the reader wants it to mean. > Religious scripts should be understood in the context of religious > initiation. You spelt 'indoctrination' incorrectly. > Our current use of printed material as kind of entertainment was - of > course - unknown in ancient times. > > One reason: printing did not exist. > > Everything was carefully written on papyrus, pergament or similar. And > that was very expensive. > > Another problem: most people could not read. > > And even if they could read, they would have trouble with Greek, Hebrew > and Latin. > > So such books were not meant to be read by common people, but by members > of some kind of monastery or church. > > And in case they had problems with understanding, they could always ask > somebody. > > And those superiors would tell them, how to interpret the text. Whatever the superior wanted it to mean. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 11:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ancttb9m7d0l5j0u310bg8h4qro1v807mp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #392829 |
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:04:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> in alt.atheism with message-id <e47l80FhsumU1@mid.individual.net> wrote: >Am 18.09.2016 10:33, schrieb Attila <: > >>> Religious scripts cannot be wrong, since they do not pretend to be true. >> >> Of course they do. >> >>> >>> So the bible is not a book about real history, even if it refers to >>> historic events. >> >> Agreed. >> >>> >>> E.g. Eva was not made from the rib of her husband Adam. >>> >>> The story has to be understood in a more symbolic way. >> >> Meaning whatever the reader wants it to mean. > > >No! Yes. > > >Whatever meaning the AUTHOR wants it to have. Nope. The author may be trying to make a point but it is always up to the reader for the final interpretation. > >Religious scripts should be understood in the context of religious >initiation. > >Our current use of printed material as kind of entertainment was - of >course - unknown in ancient times. > >One reason: printing did not exist. So what? > >Everything was carefully written on papyrus, pergament or similar. And >that was very expensive. > >Another problem: most people could not read. > >And even if they could read, they would have trouble with Greek, Hebrew >and Latin. > >So such books were not meant to be read by common people, but by members >of some kind of monastery or church. > >And in case they had problems with understanding, they could always ask >somebody. > >And those superiors would tell them, how to interpret the text. > But ultimately it is up to the individual to recognize bullshit when he sees it. Or hears it. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor OBastard. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 20:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nspnop$qos$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #392419 |
"Attila" <<prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:1cjktb1pjlt1vu94n860jiq4tmfiii8rou@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:23:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> in
> alt.atheism with message-id <e3ut39FemcbU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>
>>Am 15.09.2016 01:34, schrieb Thomas Heger:
>>
>>> Now the present believers of something new
``````````Cut Out To Make Room````````````
>>> In other words: historians are not always welcomed and can get in
>>> trouble in some cases.
>>What historians and scientists try to deliver, should be correct in an
>>objectives sense.
> Correct and should not include any personal beliefs.
>>This would be in many cases in conflict with propaganda of the powers in
>>control, since those powers usually want to decide, what is correct and
>>what is not.
> That is called political pressure.
>>So science and power are acting on the same subject, but in opposite
>>directions.
> Not power - politics.
>>
>>Scientists want truth and rulers want (more) power. If the scientists
>>eventually threaten current ideology, then the ruling classes regard
>>this as heresy.
>>We have seen this in a variety of forms in many authoritarians
>>societies, like ancient Rome, medieval Spain or the former Soviet Union.
> Political influence and pressure exists under every system.
>>But history is science and science tries to find true stories, whether
>>or not the politicians like them. Power, money, influence and ideology
>>are not scientific categories, hence usefulness of a certain finding is
>>not the aim of science, but truth.
>>If we apply scientific methods to the history of monotheistic religions,
>>we would research similarities and historic developments over many
>>millennia and over different regions, countries, cultures and languages.
> No such study could be made
> because it would be a study of belief,
> not fact.
No
It's Always Voted
For By A Culture Groups
Of The Times
Developed in the 1970s
A Science Fact
Theory is a contemplative
to a Study Of Belief
By Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche,
<
http://www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/types/contemplative-psychotherapy >
>>So Judaism, Christianity and Islam could have similarities, which were
>>not seen as such.
> Until one or more is validated that is irrelevant.
>>E.g. all three religions created a unique era, after which they number
>>the years.
>>But there was history before and the new era was not the beginning of
>>the world.
>>Only this fact is rejected, without obvious reason and against simple
>>logic. This was done, because the people of that new era saw themselves
>>in the centre of the universe (at least of the Earth) and this had to be
>>always there, where they are.
>>So further history was removed from the records and mentioning of older
>>cultures was threatened with punishment.
>>And this is so until the present day.
>>TH
All Three Holy
Religions
The Holy Farther
The Holy Son Of Nothing
Rename Or Removed
From the Records
The Holy Nothing
And Do Not Mention It
It's Crime and not permit
Under Any Name Or
Identification Nothing
With Quick Culture
Groups Of The Times
I Believe In Nothing
Is The One & Only
Who I Am
Holy
Non-Party
Too
The Evil One
Can Kiss My Ass
Said: The Son Of Nothing
Religions
The Spirit Of Nothing
Is Just A Ghost
Holy And Just
IT's Nude
Evil Comes
In Numbers
Two By One
As The Souls
Looking For Of A Party
Human Open
0
A News Craft
News Is Not Witch
The Earth Go Round
Like A Zero
Dived By One
Pistols <MAP><AREA SHAPE="RECT" COORDS="0,0,0,0"
HREF="http://www.abrock.com/MudloffSite/Akhenaten.html" target="ferrell"
TITLE
="Temple of Akhenaten"></MAP> is Witchcraft
--
Send No Money
The Reason Why
I Am a Non-Party
Candidate
Write in The Ballot
Not In Check Book
. And Vote for:
Billy Ray 0808
USA. Vice - President
Or
Billy Ray Ferrell
For:
USA. Vice - President
The Art Of Writing
It at the End
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 15:57 -0500 |
| Subject | To A Atheism The Science Of Language Is Rrelativity |
| Message-ID | <nrpjes$lt6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #392200 |
"Thomas Heger" wrote in message
news:e3pjt7F6b7rU1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 13.09.2016 06:56, schrieb Christopher A. Lee:
>
>>> The change from Aramaic language to Arabic changed the title of Jesus
>>> (in Aramaic) 'mahmed' to the name 'Mohammed' in Arabic.
English Or Chinese
It's all The Same
Change Language
Names Of all
Cattle
Fowl
Every Beast Of The Field
Who E'am Is It Now
English It Adam
But My Forefathers
Atken
Now Who Is Right
>> What a fucking moron.
> The idea stems from a German Islam scientist and historian named
> Karl-Heinz Ohlig.
<
http://www.irfi.org/articles2/articles_3151_3200/the%20great%20muslim%20scientists%20of%20all%20timehtml.htm >
> He wrote this
> http://inarah.de/sammelbaende-und-artikel/inarah-band-4/geschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen/
>
> Unfortunately this is all in German.
A Code Of Colors
Is Language
> But eventually you can get it translated into English
to Baghdad From
Merv
read story Backward
Ohlig Karl-Heinz
> by Google-translator
Will Hell
Try Translate Cowboy
Into USM or USA
English To
The United Aramaic
The Language
Now That's Science
Like Diving On The Lift Side
Now That's Nothing
But English For You
>> And why are you posting this mindless stupidity in alt.atheism and
>> sci.physics.relativity where it is completely off-topic?
The Science Of Language
That Change
left behind
Another Testament
<
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-10-06/how-did-english-become-language-science >
> Well, cross-posting is a common problem in the UseNet.
> Actually I read sci.physics.relativity and reply to posts, that show up
> there, even if they are off topic to relativity (as is this topic).
> But what other method would you suggest?
>
> I don not really want to extend the number of groups which I read, but
> have on some occasion something to say about cross-posts reaching these
> groups for unknown reasons.
I Would Suggest
Mormon Science Of Language
.
Words don't mean the same thing
If It Was Spell The Same Way
Mormonism
Behold, if you have supposed this
You have in supposed vain
> TH
I Was Hoping
For Nothing
Change Aramaic
Honorable 'Adem'
Alternative Translations
Can Get Lost In The cross-posts
Hot-Text At-ken
Honorable Redman
< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity >
--
Send No Money
The Reason Why
I Am a Non-Party
Candidate
Write in The Ballot
Not In Check Book
. And Vote for:
Billy Ray 0808
USA. Vice - President
Or
Billy Ray Ferrell
For:
USA. Vice - President
The Art Of Writing
It at the End
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-12 19:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-800586.19130012092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #392158 |
In article <e3o6boFqpamU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 12.09.2016 14:57, schrieb Ned Latham: > > >> The exists something called 'freedom of religion'. > > > > What we need is freedom *from* religion; especially, freedom > > from the tax burden that State support of religion imposes > > on us. > > > > ----snip---- > > > >> because they could eventually believe, that extermination of > >> non-believers is allowed (what it is not). > > > > Fundy Jews, Christuans and Muslims believe *exactly* that, > > and all three are guilty of genocide. > > > > Islam, Christianity and Judaism were actually the same religion. > > > This is a very interesting story and goes like this: > > There have been large empires in ancient times, which controlled also > the believes of their people. > > They merged their culture into the exact same early religion, which is > very ancient and stems from Africa. This were the early Jews, before > they went into slavery in Egypt. Since Jews were never slaves in Egypt, there's no need to read any further. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 07:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e3pfgnF5clrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #392185 |
Am 13.09.2016 04:13, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: >>>> because they could eventually believe, that extermination of >>>> non-believers is allowed (what it is not). >>> >>> Fundy Jews, Christuans and Muslims believe *exactly* that, >>> and all three are guilty of genocide. >>> >> >> Islam, Christianity and Judaism were actually the same religion. >> >> >> This is a very interesting story and goes like this: >> >> There have been large empires in ancient times, which controlled also >> the believes of their people. >> >> They merged their culture into the exact same early religion, which is >> very ancient and stems from Africa. This were the early Jews, before >> they went into slavery in Egypt. > > > Since Jews were never slaves in Egypt, there's no need to read any > further. > Moses & The Queen of Sheba 3:06 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqtJsotUU4s The Queen of Sheba was the Empress of Ethiopia who married the Egyptian (Tut-)Moses. They ruled a kingdom, which also contained the former people of Ethiopia (which were Jewish). The male line of Egyptian Sun worship then merged with monotheism in the female line (Judaism). So the original Jews must have been black people like today Ethiopians. If you call the citizens of that time 'slaves' is actually a question for debate. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-12 22:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-F6A2AF.22292512092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #392197 |
In article <e3pfgnF5clrU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 13.09.2016 04:13, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > >>>> because they could eventually believe, that extermination of > >>>> non-believers is allowed (what it is not). > >>> > >>> Fundy Jews, Christuans and Muslims believe *exactly* that, > >>> and all three are guilty of genocide. > >>> > >> > >> Islam, Christianity and Judaism were actually the same religion. > >> > >> > >> This is a very interesting story and goes like this: > >> > >> There have been large empires in ancient times, which controlled also > >> the believes of their people. > >> > >> They merged their culture into the exact same early religion, which is > >> very ancient and stems from Africa. This were the early Jews, before > >> they went into slavery in Egypt. > > > > > > Since Jews were never slaves in Egypt, there's no need to read any > > further. > > > > Moses & The Queen of Sheba 3:06 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqtJsotUU4s > > The Queen of Sheba was the Empress of Ethiopia who married the Egyptian > (Tut-)Moses. > > They ruled a kingdom, which also contained the former people of Ethiopia > (which were Jewish). > > The male line of Egyptian Sun worship then merged with monotheism in the > female line (Judaism). > > So the original Jews must have been black people like today Ethiopians. > > If you call the citizens of that time 'slaves' is actually a question > for debate. Where's your evidence that Jews were ever slaves in Egypt? That line of nonsense is not evidence. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 08:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e3pk7kF6dubU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #392198 |
Am 13.09.2016 07:29, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: >> >> Moses& The Queen of Sheba 3:06 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqtJsotUU4s >> >> The Queen of Sheba was the Empress of Ethiopia who married the Egyptian >> (Tut-)Moses. >> >> They ruled a kingdom, which also contained the former people of Ethiopia >> (which were Jewish). >> >> The male line of Egyptian Sun worship then merged with monotheism in the >> female line (Judaism). >> >> So the original Jews must have been black people like today Ethiopians. >> >> If you call the citizens of that time 'slaves' is actually a question >> for debate. > > > Where's your evidence that Jews were ever slaves in Egypt? That line of > nonsense is not evidence. > Sorry, but my knowledge of the Bible is only fragmentary. But as far as I know the Jews had to flee from Egypt. This escape was possible because the Red Sea split apart and drowned the prosecuting Egyptians. The Jews came to Egypt, because they were give to the Pharao as kind of tribute. Since it was the Queen of Sheba, who gave them to the Pharao, the Jews had to stem from her kingdom (->Ethiopia). So original Jews would have been 'black'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 00:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-7AB8BA.00052813092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #392201 |
In article <e3pk7kF6dubU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 13.09.2016 07:29, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > >> > >> Moses& The Queen of Sheba 3:06 > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqtJsotUU4s > >> > >> The Queen of Sheba was the Empress of Ethiopia who married the Egyptian > >> (Tut-)Moses. > >> > >> They ruled a kingdom, which also contained the former people of Ethiopia > >> (which were Jewish). > >> > >> The male line of Egyptian Sun worship then merged with monotheism in the > >> female line (Judaism). > >> > >> So the original Jews must have been black people like today Ethiopians. > >> > >> If you call the citizens of that time 'slaves' is actually a question > >> for debate. > > > > > > Where's your evidence that Jews were ever slaves in Egypt? That line of > > nonsense is not evidence. > > > Sorry, but my knowledge of the Bible is only fragmentary. The bible is worthless as history. > But as far as I know the Jews had to flee from Egypt. They were never in Egypt, so they never had to leave. >This escape was > possible because the Red Sea split apart and drowned the prosecuting > Egyptians. This is complete fantasy. It never happened. > The Jews came to Egypt, because they were give to the Pharao as kind of > tribute. Since it was the Queen of Sheba, who gave them to the Pharao, > the Jews had to stem from her kingdom (->Ethiopia). The Jews were never in Egypt. > So original Jews would have been 'black'. You still haven't provided evidence for this assertion. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 18:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e4ajs8F9a18U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #392202 |
Am 13.09.2016 09:05, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > >> The Jews came to Egypt, because they were give to the Pharao as kind of >> tribute. Since it was the Queen of Sheba, who gave them to the Pharao, >> the Jews had to stem from her kingdom (->Ethiopia). > > The Jews were never in Egypt. > > >> So original Jews would have been 'black'. > > You still haven't provided evidence for this assertion. > I know some people personally, who are Jewish. One is a musician and looks a little like Bob Marley. So he has dread locks and very dark skin. The 'white' Jews I know, look more or less like Germans. So how did that happen? My guess: it's all wrong and the biblical Jews were African people. And I found a lot of hits in that direction. But it's also possible to type 'black jews' into the search mask of Google or YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=black+jews results in 868,000 findings, e.g. this one "The JEWS are BLACK pt 1 Roman Catacombs 100-600 AD " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ4S1sad8Yg TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web