Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #619561 > unrolled thread

attraction field lattice...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 15:23 -0700
    Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:14 -0700
      Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 17:19 -0700
        Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:55 -0700
          Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 18:05 -0700
            Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 20:36 -0700
              Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:23 -0700
                  Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
                    Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:43 -0700
                      Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:33 -0400
                        Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 17:21 -0700
                    Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:09 -0700
                      Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:52 -0700
                        Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 16:23 -0700
                          Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 17:05 -0700
                            Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 18:03 -0700
                              Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:59 -0700
                                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:47 -0700
                                  Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 21:55 -0700
                                    Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:27 -0700
                                      Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:42 -0700
                                      Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-05 21:57 -0700
                                        Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-08 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-08 20:23 -0400
                                            Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:15 -0700
                                              Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 22:12 -0700
                                          Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 22:30 -0700
                                            Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 22:47 -0700
                                              Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 23:19 -0700
                                            Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 14:12 -0700
                                          Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 20:09 -0700
                                            Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 09:01 -0500
                                    Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-05 12:44 -0400
                                    Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
                                      Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 19:29 -0700
                              Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:56 -0700
                      Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:37 -0400
                        Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:51 -0700
                          Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400
                            Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:56 -0700
                          Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:33 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
    Re: attraction field lattice... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 11:05 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#619710

On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > 
> > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world 
> > > > > > > population has autism. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/ 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes." 
> > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know." 
> > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend? 
> > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > > > > 
> > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 
> > > > 
> > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail. 
> > 
> > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism? 
> > 
> > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
> Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. 
> 
> 
> You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" 
> 
> 
> You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes". 
> 
> 
> So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619711

On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 17:27:54 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world 
> > > > > > > > population has autism. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/ 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes." 
> > > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know." 
> > > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend? 
> > > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.) 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 
> > > > > 
> > > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail. 
> > > 
> > > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism? 
> > > 
> > > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy... 
> > Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. 
> > 
> > 
> > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" 
> > 
> > 
> > You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes". 
> > 
> > 
> > So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism???? 
> > -- 
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.

Keep making wise faces, trash, confronting
with evidence is only making you barking more
fiercely. You're just a clown. Just like your
fellow idiots.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619756

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world
> > > > > > > > population has autism.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes."
> > > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know."
> > > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend?
> > > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
> > >
> > > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
> > >
> > > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
> > Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.
> >
> >
> > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"
> >
> >
> > You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".
> >
> >
> > So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.

You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" meaning anything writen in a biography book is not reliable???? 

But you haven't express what is reliable information. What type of information do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????


I think you shall fail to tell everyone what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????


you know how stupid you look now?  Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. you proven it.


So, what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????


 







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619918

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world
> > > > > > > > > population has autism.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes."
> > > > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know."
> > > > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend?
> > > > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
> > > >
> > > > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
> > > >
> > > > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
> > > Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.
> > >
> > >
> > > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"
> > >
> > >
> > > You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".
> > >
> > >
> > > So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.
> 
> You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" meaning anything writen in a biography book is not reliable????
> 
> But you haven't express what is reliable information. What type of information do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> 
> I think you shall fail to tell everyone what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> 
> you know how stupid you look now?  Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. you proven it.
> 
> So, what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> 
> 

Well, nevermind Paul, you're a complete waste of everybodys time anyway..


I'll continue for others here benefits.


But first, I need to educate others here (if not everyone) what are the symptoms of Autism so
that yous have a better Level of understanding...

since most of yous don't read Books...
start with:

Watch Love on the Spectrum | Netflix Official Site
https://www.netflix.com/title/81338328


I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 
btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out.  It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!

i'll continue with more information later...

 








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619922

On 9/8/2023 6:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out.  It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!

OK. Given how certain you are of this, let's see your "evidence". Or you 
can just admit that you have been lying about this all along.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619926

On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:23:58 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> On 9/8/2023 6:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 

> > btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out. It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> OK. Given how certain you are of this, let's see your "evidence". Or you 
> can just admit that you have been lying about this all along.

Of course he is lying, he is just another run-of-the-mill crank!

Of course, he could prove me wrong and present his evidence, but we all know that he has none.  Right, Starfaker?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619940

On Saturday, 9 September 2023 at 03:15:45 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:23:58 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: 
> > On 9/8/2023 6:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > 
> > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 
> 
> > > btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out. It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > OK. Given how certain you are of this, let's see your "evidence". Or you 
> > can just admit that you have been lying about this all along.
> Of course he is lying, he is just another run-of-the-mill crank! 
> 
> Of course, he could prove me wrong and present his evidence, but we all know that he has none. Right, Starfaker?

Al, poor trash, the evidence that the mumble of
your idiot guru was not even consistent is only
making you barking more fiercely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619995

Lack of eye contact is a well-known trait of autism.
Autistic Adults Say Eye Contact Is Painful 
Additional research shows autistic adults often experience physical
discomfort when making eye contact. Negative physical symptoms
associated with eye contact in autistic people include: 

    Dizziness 
    Headaches
    Increased heart rate
    Nausea
    Pain
    Tremors 
https://www.verywellhealth.com/autism-symptoms-and-eye-contact-260565

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=autism+avoids+or+does+not+keep+eye+contact



https://www.spectrumnews.org/opinion/viewpoint/eye-contact-aversive-adults-autism/

https://s3.amazonaws.com/spectrumnews-web-assets/uploads/1970/01/Spectrum-6-Eye-contact-v2.jpg

As I already mentioned before...first, I need to educate others here
(if not everyone) what are the symptoms of Autism so
that yous have a better Level of understanding... 


What will follow next is...

The 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence
I have is overwhelming!!!
It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!


IT'S GOING TO FUCKING BLOW YOUR MIND!!!!



On Fri, 08 Sep 2023 15:17:18 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Paul Alsing wrote:
>> >
>> > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world
>> > > > > > > > > population has autism.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes."
>> > > > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know."
>> > > > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend?
>> > > > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
>> > > >
>> > > > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
>> > > >
>> > > > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
>> > > Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
>> > > --
>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> >
>> > Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.
>> 
>> You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" meaning anything writen in a biography book is not reliable????
>> 
>> But you haven't express what is reliable information. What type of information do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
>> 
>> I think you shall fail to tell everyone what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
>> 
>> you know how stupid you look now?  Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. you proven it.
>> 
>> So, what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
>> 
>> 
>
>Well, nevermind Paul, you're a complete waste of everybodys time anyway..
>
>
>I'll continue for others here benefits.
>
>
>But first, I need to educate others here (if not everyone) what are the symptoms of Autism so
>that yous have a better Level of understanding...
>
>since most of yous don't read Books...
>start with:
>
>Watch Love on the Spectrum | Netflix Official Site
>https://www.netflix.com/title/81338328
>
>
>I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
>It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 
>btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out.  It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
>
>i'll continue with more information later...
>
> 
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619997

On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:30:31 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:

> >I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> >It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! 

Yet another lie from the starfaker.

He has zero evidence.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#620002

On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 07:47:23 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:30:31 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> 
> > >I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > >It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> Yet another lie from the starfaker. 
> 
> He has zero evidence.

Come on, trash, the evidence would only make you
angry and barking more fiercely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#620041

On 9/9/2023 10:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Lack of eye contact is a well-known trait of autism.
> Autistic Adults Say Eye Contact Is Painful
> Additional research shows autistic adults often experience physical
> discomfort when making eye contact. Negative physical symptoms
> associated with eye contact in autistic people include:
> 
>      Dizziness
>      Headaches
>      Increased heart rate
>      Nausea
>      Pain
>      Tremors
> https://www.verywellhealth.com/autism-symptoms-and-eye-contact-260565
[...]

Must give them the following test:

https://youtu.be/OWK6oSbSKKc

https://youtu.be/Umc9ezAyJv0

:^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#620001

Lack of eye contact is a well-known trait of autism.
Autistic Adults Say Eye Contact Is Painful 
Additional research shows autistic adults often experience physical discomfort when making eye contact. Negative physical symptoms associated with eye contact in autistic people include: 

    Dizziness 
    Headaches
    Increased heart rate
    Nausea
    Pain
    Tremors 
https://www.verywellhealth.com/autism-symptoms-and-eye-contact-260565

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=autism+avoids+or+does+not+keep+eye+contact



https://www.spectrumnews.org/opinion/viewpoint/eye-contact-aversive-adults-autism/

https://s3.amazonaws.com/spectrumnews-web-assets/uploads/1970/01/Spectrum-6-Eye-contact-v2.jpg

As I already mentioned before...first, I need to educate others here (if not everyone) what are the symptoms of Autism so
that yous have a better Level of understanding... 


What will follow next is

The 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!


IT'S GOING TO FUCKING BLOW YOUR MIND!!!!







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:55:45 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world
> > > > > > > > > > population has autism.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes."
> > > > > > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know."
> > > > > > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend?
> > > > > > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
> > > > >
> > > > > > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
> > > > Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > Keep deflecting, starfaker, that is all you have to offer... you certainly have zero evidence in support of your invalid claim.
> >
> > You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable" meaning anything writen in a biography book is not reliable????
> >
> > But you haven't express what is reliable information. What type of information do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> >
> > I think you shall fail to tell everyone what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> >
> > you know how stupid you look now?  Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted. you proven it.
> >
> > So, what is Your criteria for information that you accept as proof or evidence of autism????
> >
> >
> 
> Well, nevermind Paul, you're a complete waste of everybodys time anyway..
> 
> I'll continue for others here benefits.
> 
> But first, I need to educate others here (if not everyone) what are the symptoms of Autism so
> that yous have a better Level of understanding...
> 
> since most of yous don't read Books...
> start with:
> 
> Watch Love on the Spectrum | Netflix Official Site
> https://www.netflix.com/title/81338328
> 
> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> btw, Albert Einstein has an extreme case of Autism which yous will soon find out.  It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> 
> i'll continue with more information later...
> 
> 
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#620012

On 9/9/2023 10:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Lack of eye contact is a well-known trait of autism.
> Autistic Adults Say Eye Contact Is Painful
> Additional research shows autistic adults often experience physical discomfort when making eye contact. Negative physical symptoms associated with eye contact in autistic people include:


You can't adequately discuss it in this way.

Autistic people are very different people from each other. They cannot 
be discussed as a whole.

They are like the container of 10 or 12 different edible seeds, peas, 
beans, grains and legume and ... that I have, all mixed together and 
cooked together as one of the ingredients of cat food that I make at 
home. You cannot say, "This thing cooks in 1/2 hour", cause different 
ingredients of it gets cooked at a different time.

I have a well-defined form of autism, and yet do not mind one bit 
looking straight at anyone I talk with, making eye contact with them for 
any length of time necessary. Especially with women. I have to do that 
to understand them better and make them understand me better.

So, saying autistic people do not make eye contact is like saying my 
mixture of seeds cooks in exactly 29 minutes :)



-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619716

On 9/5/2023 12:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Paul Alsing wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Paul Alsing wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:

>>>>> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
>>>>
>>>> So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
>>
>>> What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
>>
>> Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...
> 
> 
> Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.
> 
> 
> You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"
> 
> 
> You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".
> 
> 
> So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????

You wrote that you have "100 percent irrefutable proof" that Einstein 
had autism. Let's see it. What Paul considers an acceptable diagnosis 
isn't relevant until you present your "100 percent irrefutable proof".

Either present your "100 percent irrefutable proof" or admit that you 
are a liar and there is no such proof. Or you can run away with your 
tail between your legs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619741

On 9/4/2023 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism!


All top scientists have a form of autism. There's nothing too magic 
about brain, one can take a careful look and more or less figure it out 
without having a Nobel Prize in it or even a PhD.

Main compartments of brain are clearly distinguishable from each other. 
We are creatures run by nothing other than three major activities of 
brain which to a good extent also have three distinct areas inside the 
cortex. Emotional, Fear based, and Analytical.

Scientists (the top ones) seem to have allocated some of the brain 
powers that in a normal person serves the fear based center, and have 
added them to the analytical center. Since this involves a change from 
normal allocations, it is called "autism."

Scientists do _not_ show the shortcomings in their "emotional" centers, 
as seen so well among the Aspergers. Aspergers are like robots compared 
to scientists. And scientists sure have superior allocations in the 
analytical centers, just like Aspergers. So the only possibility left is 
that scientists borrowed from the fear based center and added it to the 
analytical area.

Aspergers on the other hand, clearly show they borrowed some of that 
extra power in the analytics center from the emotional center. That's 
why if any of you, right now, drop dead, I will fart in your memory 
"right away". That's an Asperger, baby.

All the other extreme human types, from smart alecks ("engineers") to 
criminals, also went through similar variations in allocation of brain 
power, each borrowing from one center and adding to another. And again 
the results can be seen relatively easily.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619745

On 9/5/2023 4:29 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 9/4/2023 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism!
> 
> 
> All top scientists have a form of autism. There's nothing too magic 
> about brain, one can take a careful look and more or less figure it out 
> without having a Nobel Prize in it or even a PhD.
> 
> Main compartments of brain are clearly distinguishable from each other. 
> We are creatures run by nothing other than three major activities of 
> brain which to a good extent also have three distinct areas inside the 
> cortex. Emotional, Fear based, and Analytical.
> 
> Scientists (the top ones) seem to have allocated some of the brain 
> powers that in a normal person serves the fear based center, and have 
> added them to the analytical center. Since this involves a change from 
> normal allocations, it is called "autism."
> 
> Scientists do _not_ show the shortcomings in their "emotional" centers, 
> as seen so well among the Aspergers. Aspergers are like robots compared 
> to scientists. And scientists sure have superior allocations in the 
> analytical centers, just like Aspergers. So the only possibility left is 
> that scientists borrowed from the fear based center and added it to the 
> analytical area.
> 
> Aspergers on the other hand, clearly show they borrowed some of that 
> extra power in the analytics center from the emotional center. That's 
> why if any of you, right now, drop dead, I will fart in your memory 
> "right away". That's an Asperger, baby.
> 
> All the other extreme human types, from smart alecks ("engineers") to 
> criminals, also went through similar variations in allocation of brain 
> power, each borrowing from one center and adding to another. And again 
> the results can be seen relatively easily.
> 
> 

Some music to go along with your overall theme:

https://youtu.be/mpYzO6bZMTs

;^D

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619695

On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 03:03:28 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world 
> > > > population has autism. 
> > > 
> > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/ 
> > > 
> > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes." 
> > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know." 
> > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend? 
> > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.) 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!! 
> > 
> > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> So, present your "evidence" or run away

Al, poor trash, the evidence is only making you barking
more fiercely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619661

After serious thinking The Starmaker wrote :
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> 
>> On 9/3/2023 9:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 9/3/2023 6:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> In 3d, this field based experimental algorithm of mine is starting 
>>>>>>>>>> to freak me out a bit:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1025546905270974&set=pcb.1025546935270971
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Can you get to the link our should I upload it to imgbb?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> all is see is a mirror image
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It is not a mirror image. Notice how the field lines don't line up? 
>>>>>>>> Btw, if you use my work, a little credit would be nice. :^)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5I9LamXEAAHSJS?format=jpg&name=large
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698487309337858172/photo/1
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Steve Jobs: “Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal”
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> they don't line up because it wasn't programmed to line up.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My field lines all line up as is. In its original form, not artificially
>>>>> tweaked with. :^)
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> do you want me to line it up? i take paypal.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LOL!!!! Fair enough. ;^D Touche. Well, I would like a little credit
>>>>>> since I programmed the god damn thing! :^)
>>>> 
>>>> What programing did you do???? You just went on open AI Dall-e and 
>>>> prompted: throw some colorful spaghetti on the wall! freak me out a bit 
>>>> dall-e!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> mine is starting to freak me out a bit...
>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5J28xobkAAlMr1?format=png&name=900x900
>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698550840100008187/photo/1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> bada bing, bada boom...
>>> 
>>> it's amazing what you can do with a little math...
>> 
>> Moron.
>> 
>
> "Moron"? Is that what yous people in the 'sci community' call the rest of the 
> 99 percent population of the people on earth????

No, you are likely confusing "moron" for "idiot".

> Isn't it possible that yous 1 percent are a ...mistake of nature? 

I think "moron" comes in at a close second place though.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619687

FromTheRafters wrote:
> 
> After serious thinking The Starmaker wrote :
> > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/3/2023 9:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/3/2023 6:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In 3d, this field based experimental algorithm of mine is starting
> >>>>>>>>>> to freak me out a bit:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1025546905270974&set=pcb.1025546935270971
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Can you get to the link our should I upload it to imgbb?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> all is see is a mirror image
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It is not a mirror image. Notice how the field lines don't line up?
> >>>>>>>> Btw, if you use my work, a little credit would be nice. :^)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5I9LamXEAAHSJS?format=jpg&name=large
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698487309337858172/photo/1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Steve Jobs: “Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal”
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> they don't line up because it wasn't programmed to line up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My field lines all line up as is. In its original form, not artificially
> >>>>> tweaked with. :^)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> do you want me to line it up? i take paypal.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LOL!!!! Fair enough. ;^D Touche. Well, I would like a little credit
> >>>>>> since I programmed the god damn thing! :^)
> >>>>
> >>>> What programing did you do???? You just went on open AI Dall-e and
> >>>> prompted: throw some colorful spaghetti on the wall! freak me out a bit
> >>>> dall-e!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> mine is starting to freak me out a bit...
> >>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5J28xobkAAlMr1?format=png&name=900x900
> >>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698550840100008187/photo/1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> bada bing, bada boom...
> >>>
> >>> it's amazing what you can do with a little math...
> >>
> >> Moron.
> >>
> >
> > "Moron"? Is that what yous people in the 'sci community' call the rest of the
> > 99 percent population of the people on earth????
> 
> No, you are likely confusing "moron" for "idiot".

There is no confusion. You're just 2 years old.

If you look at the defintion of "moron" and "idiot"...

https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron

https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot

They both have the exact definition: "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."



https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron

https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot


"A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."


https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron
definition of moron: 
"A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."


https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot
definition of idiot: 
"A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."




ain't you the one who is confused? stupid.








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#619700

The Starmaker pretended :
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> 
>> After serious thinking The Starmaker wrote :
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/3/2023 9:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 6:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> In 3d, this field based experimental algorithm of mine is starting
>>>>>>>>>>>> to freak me out a bit:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1025546905270974&set=pcb.1025546935270971
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you get to the link our should I upload it to imgbb?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> all is see is a mirror image
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It is not a mirror image. Notice how the field lines don't line up?
>>>>>>>>>> Btw, if you use my work, a little credit would be nice. :^)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5I9LamXEAAHSJS?format=jpg&name=large
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698487309337858172/photo/1
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Steve Jobs: “Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal”
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> they don't line up because it wasn't programmed to line up.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My field lines all line up as is. In its original form, not 
>>>>>>> artificially tweaked with. :^)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> do you want me to line it up? i take paypal.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> LOL!!!! Fair enough. ;^D Touche. Well, I would like a little credit
>>>>>>>> since I programmed the god damn thing! :^)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What programing did you do???? You just went on open AI Dall-e and
>>>>>> prompted: throw some colorful spaghetti on the wall! freak me out a bit
>>>>>> dall-e!
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> mine is starting to freak me out a bit...
>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5J28xobkAAlMr1?format=png&name=900x900
>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698550840100008187/photo/1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> bada bing, bada boom...
>>>>> 
>>>>> it's amazing what you can do with a little math...
>>>> 
>>>> Moron.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> "Moron"? Is that what yous people in the 'sci community' call the rest of 
>>> the 99 percent population of the people on earth????
>> 
>> No, you are likely confusing "moron" for "idiot".
>
> There is no confusion. You're just 2 years old.
>
> If you look at the defintion of "moron" and "idiot"...
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot
>
> They both have the exact definition: "A disabled person mentally equal or 
> inferior to a child two years old."
>
>
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot
>
>
> "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."
>
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron
> definition of moron: 
> "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."
>
>
> https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot
> definition of idiot: 
> "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old."
>
>
>
>
> ain't you the one who is confused? stupid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbecile

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web