Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #619741

Re: attraction field lattice...

From Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: attraction field lattice...
Date 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
Message-ID <ud8dlk$10a0d$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <64F670B2.475B@ix.netcom.com> <905ce0a0-858e-434c-8509-736d6f260ea2n@googlegroups.com> <64F6A78F.4D01@ix.netcom.com> <eb66cfbf-1ebc-49a7-9d20-3005f4438694n@googlegroups.com> <64F6B4DD.1557@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/4/2023 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism!


All top scientists have a form of autism. There's nothing too magic 
about brain, one can take a careful look and more or less figure it out 
without having a Nobel Prize in it or even a PhD.

Main compartments of brain are clearly distinguishable from each other. 
We are creatures run by nothing other than three major activities of 
brain which to a good extent also have three distinct areas inside the 
cortex. Emotional, Fear based, and Analytical.

Scientists (the top ones) seem to have allocated some of the brain 
powers that in a normal person serves the fear based center, and have 
added them to the analytical center. Since this involves a change from 
normal allocations, it is called "autism."

Scientists do _not_ show the shortcomings in their "emotional" centers, 
as seen so well among the Aspergers. Aspergers are like robots compared 
to scientists. And scientists sure have superior allocations in the 
analytical centers, just like Aspergers. So the only possibility left is 
that scientists borrowed from the fear based center and added it to the 
analytical area.

Aspergers on the other hand, clearly show they borrowed some of that 
extra power in the analytics center from the emotional center. That's 
why if any of you, right now, drop dead, I will fart in your memory 
"right away". That's an Asperger, baby.

All the other extreme human types, from smart alecks ("engineers") to 
criminals, also went through similar variations in allocation of brain 
power, each borrowing from one center and adding to another. And again 
the results can be seen relatively easily.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 15:23 -0700
  Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:14 -0700
    Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 17:19 -0700
      Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:55 -0700
        Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 18:05 -0700
          Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 20:36 -0700
            Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700
              Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:23 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:43 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:33 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 17:21 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:09 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:52 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 16:23 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 17:05 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 18:03 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:59 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:47 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 21:55 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:27 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:42 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-05 21:57 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-08 15:17 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-08 20:23 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:15 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 22:12 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 22:30 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 22:47 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 23:19 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 14:12 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 20:09 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 09:01 -0500
                Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-05 12:44 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 19:29 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:56 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:37 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:51 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:56 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:33 -0700
              Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
  Re: attraction field lattice... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 11:05 -0700

csiph-web