Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: attraction field lattice... |
| Date | 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400 |
| Organization | Peripheral Visions |
| Message-ID | <ud6o7v$1t8gq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <64F55BC8.512D@ix.netcom.com> <ud585g$1j6bo$2@dont-email.me> <64F64775.600@ix.netcom.com> <ud5m7l$1lcjl$1@dont-email.me> <64F6A5AB.7CF8@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker pretended : > FromTheRafters wrote: >> >> After serious thinking The Starmaker wrote : >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> >>>> On 9/3/2023 9:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 6:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/2023 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In 3d, this field based experimental algorithm of mine is starting >>>>>>>>>>>> to freak me out a bit: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1025546905270974&set=pcb.1025546935270971 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you get to the link our should I upload it to imgbb? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> all is see is a mirror image >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is not a mirror image. Notice how the field lines don't line up? >>>>>>>>>> Btw, if you use my work, a little credit would be nice. :^) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5I9LamXEAAHSJS?format=jpg&name=large >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698487309337858172/photo/1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steve Jobs: ââ¬ÅGood Artists Copy, Great Artists Stealââ¬Â >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> they don't line up because it wasn't programmed to line up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My field lines all line up as is. In its original form, not >>>>>>> artificially tweaked with. :^) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> do you want me to line it up? i take paypal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL!!!! Fair enough. ;^D Touche. Well, I would like a little credit >>>>>>>> since I programmed the god damn thing! :^) >>>>>> >>>>>> What programing did you do???? You just went on open AI Dall-e and >>>>>> prompted: throw some colorful spaghetti on the wall! freak me out a bit >>>>>> dall-e! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> mine is starting to freak me out a bit... >>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5J28xobkAAlMr1?format=png&name=900x900 >>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698550840100008187/photo/1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> bada bing, bada boom... >>>>> >>>>> it's amazing what you can do with a little math... >>>> >>>> Moron. >>>> >>> >>> "Moron"? Is that what yous people in the 'sci community' call the rest of >>> the 99 percent population of the people on earth???? >> >> No, you are likely confusing "moron" for "idiot". > > There is no confusion. You're just 2 years old. > > If you look at the defintion of "moron" and "idiot"... > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot > > They both have the exact definition: "A disabled person mentally equal or > inferior to a child two years old." > > > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot > > > "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old." > > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/moron > definition of moron: > "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old." > > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/idiot > definition of idiot: > "A disabled person mentally equal or inferior to a child two years old." > > > > > ain't you the one who is confused? stupid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbecile
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 15:23 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:14 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 17:19 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:55 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 18:05 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 20:36 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:23 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:43 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:33 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 17:21 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:09 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:52 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 17:05 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:59 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 21:55 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-05 12:44 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 19:29 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-05 21:57 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-08 15:17 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-08 20:23 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 22:30 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 14:12 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Kentarski Freed Chikeng <kentarski.freed.chikeng@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:49 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:52 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:59 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 20:09 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 09:01 -0500
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:37 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:51 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:56 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:33 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
csiph-web