Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388165 > unrolled thread

The Next Game

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                                  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                                    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                                      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                                        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
    Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
        Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
            Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
                Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
              Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
    [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#388165 — The Next Game

Vanilla Sky
Permutation City
The 13th Floor
Total Recall
Animatrix
The Matrix


Life does not exist
anywhere else in the universe..

there is no law that states
that life exist elsewhere..
there is no universal law
or principle that states
life exist elsewhere
in the universe...

but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#388219

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Vanilla Sky
> Permutation City
> The 13th Floor
> Total Recall
> Animatrix
> The Matrix
> 
> Life does not exist
> anywhere else in the universe..
> 
> there is no law that states
> that life exist elsewhere..
> there is no universal law
> or principle that states
> life exist elsewhere
> in the universe...
> 
> but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.


Since the truth is...

Life does not exist
anywhere else in the universe..

NASA needs to stop searching for
water and instead search for
the computer or software
running the universe.

Why bother sending rocketships to
Mars and Jupiter which are only..
computer simulated planets?


Instead of seearching for water, NASA
should be searching for...
computer errors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388221

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Vanilla Sky
> > Permutation City
> > The 13th Floor
> > Total Recall
> > Animatrix
> > The Matrix
> >
> > Life does not exist
> > anywhere else in the universe..
> >
> > there is no law that states
> > that life exist elsewhere..
> > there is no universal law
> > or principle that states
> > life exist elsewhere
> > in the universe...
> >
> > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> 
> Since the truth is...
> 
> Life does not exist
> anywhere else in the universe..
> 
> NASA needs to stop searching for
> water and instead search for
> the computer or software
> running the universe.
> 
> Why bother sending rocketships to
> Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> computer simulated planets?
> 
> Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> should be searching for...
> computer errors.


To put it simply..
the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.

http://www.simulation-argument.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388240

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Vanilla Sky
> > > Permutation City
> > > The 13th Floor
> > > Total Recall
> > > Animatrix
> > > The Matrix
> > >
> > > Life does not exist
> > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > >
> > > there is no law that states
> > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > there is no universal law
> > > or principle that states
> > > life exist elsewhere
> > > in the universe...
> > >
> > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> >
> > Since the truth is...
> >
> > Life does not exist
> > anywhere else in the universe..
> >
> > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > water and instead search for
> > the computer or software
> > running the universe.
> >
> > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > computer simulated planets?
> >
> > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > should be searching for...
> > computer errors.
> 
> To put it simply..
> the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> 
> http://www.simulation-argument.com/


Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...


Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388249

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > Permutation City
> > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > Total Recall
> > > > Animatrix
> > > > The Matrix
> > > >
> > > > Life does not exist
> > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > >
> > > > there is no law that states
> > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > there is no universal law
> > > > or principle that states
> > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > in the universe...
> > > >
> > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > >
> > > Since the truth is...
> > >
> > > Life does not exist
> > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > >
> > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > water and instead search for
> > > the computer or software
> > > running the universe.
> > >
> > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > computer simulated planets?
> > >
> > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > should be searching for...
> > > computer errors.
> >
> > To put it simply..
> > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> >
> > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> 
> Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> 
> Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.


There simply isn't...
enough computer power
for another Earth.


If you understand...
how much computer power it takes,
to create the heavens and the earth..

then you'll understand
why there can only be one earth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388285

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > The Matrix
> > > > >
> > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > in the universe...
> > > > >
> > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > >
> > > > Since the truth is...
> > > >
> > > > Life does not exist
> > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > >
> > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > water and instead search for
> > > > the computer or software
> > > > running the universe.
> > > >
> > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > >
> > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > should be searching for...
> > > > computer errors.
> > >
> > > To put it simply..
> > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > >
> > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> >
> > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> >
> > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> 
> There simply isn't...
> enough computer power
> for another Earth.
> 
> If you understand...
> how much computer power it takes,
> to create the heavens and the earth..
> 
> then you'll understand
> why there can only be one earth.


"We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream? 
We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare? 
Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388286

https://www.fat.bme.hu/student/pub/Programozas3/SimulationArgument.pdf



Nasa doesn't want to bring up the SimulationArgument because it will 
throw their whole 'search for water' industry out-of-business.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > >
> > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > running the universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > computer errors.
> > > >
> > > > To put it simply..
> > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > >
> > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > >
> > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> >
> > There simply isn't...
> > enough computer power
> > for another Earth.
> >
> > If you understand...
> > how much computer power it takes,
> > to create the heavens and the earth..
> >
> > then you'll understand
> > why there can only be one earth.
> 
> "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388292

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > >
> > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > running the universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > computer errors.
> > > >
> > > > To put it simply..
> > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > >
> > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > >
> > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> >
> > There simply isn't...
> > enough computer power
> > for another Earth.
> >
> > If you understand...
> > how much computer power it takes,
> > to create the heavens and the earth..
> >
> > then you'll understand
> > why there can only be one earth.
> 
> "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling

book review
http://web.mit.edu/asf/www/PopularScience/Friedman_TheFabricOfRealityReview_2001.pdf

and the book:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj7g6i35YzOAhUMwmMKHRKvCiIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.daftarche.com%2Fattachments%2Fenglish-31%2F3940d1397513247-book-reviews-fabric-reality.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGZeKB5_llWzokf3hv9PWBXH9l7HA


or the first link here:
https://www.google.com/#q=the+fabric+of+reality+pdf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388293

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > >
> > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > >
> > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > >
> > > There simply isn't...
> > > enough computer power
> > > for another Earth.
> > >
> > > If you understand...
> > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > >
> > > then you'll understand
> > > why there can only be one earth.
> >
> > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> 
> book review
> http://web.mit.edu/asf/www/PopularScience/Friedman_TheFabricOfRealityReview_2001.pdf
> 
> and the book:
> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj7g6i35YzOAhUMwmMKHRKvCiIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.daftarche.com%2Fattachments%2Fenglish-31%2F3940d1397513247-book-reviews-fabric-reality.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGZeKB5_llWzokf3hv9PWBXH9l7HA
> 
> or the first link here:
> https://www.google.com/#q=the+fabric+of+reality+pdf


http://themindi.blogspot.com/2007/02/introduction.html



you guys need a little info before you can even comprehend what The Next
Game is..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388295

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > >
> > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > running the universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > computer errors.
> > > >
> > > > To put it simply..
> > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > >
> > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > >
> > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> >
> > There simply isn't...
> > enough computer power
> > for another Earth.
> >
> > If you understand...
> > how much computer power it takes,
> > to create the heavens and the earth..
> >
> > then you'll understand
> > why there can only be one earth.
> 
> "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling


 René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:

    Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
if you were unable to wake from that dream? 
How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
world? 




i have to figure out if usenet is a dream...
some of yous are a nightmare.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388296

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > >
> > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > >
> > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > >
> > > There simply isn't...
> > > enough computer power
> > > for another Earth.
> > >
> > > If you understand...
> > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > >
> > > then you'll understand
> > > why there can only be one earth.
> >
> > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> 
>  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> 
>     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> world?

http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html



of course these people (links) are from the past...


i'm the future


i take it to a whole new level.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388316

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > >
> > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > >
> > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > enough computer power
> > > > for another Earth.
> > > >
> > > > If you understand...
> > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > >
> > > > then you'll understand
> > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > >
> > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> >
> >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> >
> >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > world?
> 
> http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> 
> of course these people (links) are from the past...
> 
> i'm the future
> 
> i take it to a whole new level.


What most people don't understand is that
Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388537

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > > >
> > > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > > enough computer power
> > > > > for another Earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you understand...
> > > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > > >
> > > > > then you'll understand
> > > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > > >
> > > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> > >
> > >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> > >
> > >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > > world?
> >
> > http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> >
> > of course these people (links) are from the past...
> >
> > i'm the future
> >
> > i take it to a whole new level.
> 
> What most people don't understand is that
> Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.


To end this simulation-argument...

I have proof that the universe and the earth
is a computer simulation...the evidence is overwhelming.

For example...our Moon (a computable 0-1 particle)..
if the dark side of the moon was facing the earth...it wouldn't
rain..there would be no ocean.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388549

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > > > enough computer power
> > > > > > for another Earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you understand...
> > > > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > then you'll understand
> > > > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> > > >
> > > >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > > > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> > > >
> > > >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > > > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > > > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > > > world?
> > >
> > > http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> > >
> > > of course these people (links) are from the past...
> > >
> > > i'm the future
> > >
> > > i take it to a whole new level.
> >
> > What most people don't understand is that
> > Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.
> 
> To end this simulation-argument...
> 
> I have proof that the universe and the earth
> is a computer simulation...the evidence is overwhelming.
> 
> For example...our Moon (a computable 0-1 particle)..
> if the dark side of the moon was facing the earth...it wouldn't
> rain..there would be no ocean.

The question "Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?" has been answered. The answer is Yes. 

I have answered it. I got the proof. It is...Indisputable.


But now, ...I have to make some simple changes in the math world.

Magnetic north and magnetic south need to be changed to: Mn=1 and Ms=0.


For example: Our moon facing us is 1, and the dark side is 0.


That's it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388565

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > > > > enough computer power
> > > > > > > for another Earth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you understand...
> > > > > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > then you'll understand
> > > > > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > > > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > > > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> > > > >
> > > > >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > > > > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > > > > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > > > > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > > > > world?
> > > >
> > > > http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> > > >
> > > > of course these people (links) are from the past...
> > > >
> > > > i'm the future
> > > >
> > > > i take it to a whole new level.
> > >
> > > What most people don't understand is that
> > > Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.
> >
> > To end this simulation-argument...
> >
> > I have proof that the universe and the earth
> > is a computer simulation...the evidence is overwhelming.
> >
> > For example...our Moon (a computable 0-1 particle)..
> > if the dark side of the moon was facing the earth...it wouldn't
> > rain..there would be no ocean.
> 
> The question "Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?" has been answered. The answer is Yes.
> 
> I have answered it. I got the proof. It is...Indisputable.
> 
> But now, ...I have to make some simple changes in the math world.
> 
> Magnetic north and magnetic south need to be changed to: Mn=1 and Ms=0.
> 
> For example: Our moon facing us is 1, and the dark side is 0.
> 
> That's it.


In other words...when the question is asked:
Why do we only see one side of the moon? or
Why does the same side of the moon always face Earth?

Why is the same portion of the Moon's sphere is always facing the Earth?

The answer always given is wrong....until now.


Why do we only see one side of the moon? Answer: It's the positive side, the 1, the magnetic north of the moon.

The tides on the earth change according to the magneitc pull of the moon. 

It pushes and pulls...1 and 1 , zero and 1. 

It pushes and pulls..earth=1 and moon=1, earth=0 and moon=1.


The moon always remains...1.

The earth changes from 1 to 0

It attracts and repells.


Now, I should move to  people's
one and zero.

> People are computer simulations living
> in a computer simulated universe, and they
> are computational. The One is on your Right,
> and the Zero is on your Left side.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388610

you have to ask yourself the question
"Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
pole?"

Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?


Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
north???


There is no magnet on either end...


It's zero, one.


burn your text books.


don't follow the water..
follow the 0,1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388622

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> you have to ask yourself the question
> "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> pole?"
> 
> Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> 
> Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> north???
> 
> There is no magnet on either end...
> 
> It's zero, one.
> 
> burn your text books.
> 
> don't follow the water..
> follow the 0,1


Like for example...

Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
upload it to your computer..
first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..

Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????

Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
it's on your north pole and your south pole.

I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!

Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg


> People are computer simulations, and they
> are computational. The One is on your Right,
> and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> of people is on their Right side, and their
> Negative is on their left side.




Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg


The criminal is on the left hand..
so what is the lie dectector industry
doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????


My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388704

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > you have to ask yourself the question
> > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > pole?"
> >
> > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> >
> > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > north???
> >
> > There is no magnet on either end...
> >
> > It's zero, one.
> >
> > burn your text books.
> >
> > don't follow the water..
> > follow the 0,1
> 
> Like for example...
> 
> Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> upload it to your computer..
> first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> 
> Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> 
> Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> 
> I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> 
> Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> 
> > People are computer simulations, and they
> > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > Negative is on their left side.
> 
> Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> 
> The criminal is on the left hand..
> so what is the lie dectector industry
> doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> 
> My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!



Look, it's very simple..
in order to prove
we are living in a
computer simulation
you first have to
describe people
in
mathematical terms.


Nature's math is simple.

zero, one

I will soon show you
a mathematical model
of people in 0,1
using photograph illustration.

It is indisputable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388925

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > pole?"
> > >
> > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > >
> > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > north???
> > >
> > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > >
> > > It's zero, one.
> > >
> > > burn your text books.
> > >
> > > don't follow the water..
> > > follow the 0,1
> >
> > Like for example...
> >
> > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > upload it to your computer..
> > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> >
> > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> >
> > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> >
> > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> >
> > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> >
> > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > Negative is on their left side.
> >
> > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> >
> > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> >
> > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> 
> Look, it's very simple..
> in order to prove
> we are living in a
> computer simulation
> you first have to
> describe people
> in
> mathematical terms.
> 
> Nature's math is simple.
> 
> zero, one
> 
> I will soon show you
> a mathematical model
> of people in 0,1
> using photograph illustration.
> 
> It is indisputable.


Not only do you have to
show the mathematical model, but
also the language needs to be
converted so that others
can understand in which they
are more fimilar with.

For example:

0,1
zero, one
negative, positive
Left, Right
etc, etc..



Now, before I explain
How a person is divided
in half from head to toe,
left, right
0, 1

I'll start from
what you're most
familiar with...

or, the 'scientific community'
incomplete findings:

http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png

The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
but not the whole rest of the body.

http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png

I have to fill in their missing parts..

I will provide the missing parts soon,
but first before I do..you need to be
more familiar with what is already known.

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg

I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.

But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
living in a computer simulated universe,
so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.

You people are to close to the trees to see the
computer...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388967

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > > pole?"
> > > >
> > > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > > >
> > > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > > north???
> > > >
> > > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > > >
> > > > It's zero, one.
> > > >
> > > > burn your text books.
> > > >
> > > > don't follow the water..
> > > > follow the 0,1
> > >
> > > Like for example...
> > >
> > > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > > upload it to your computer..
> > > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> > >
> > > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> > >
> > > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> > >
> > > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> > >
> > > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > >
> > > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > > Negative is on their left side.
> > >
> > > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > >
> > > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> > >
> > > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> >
> > Look, it's very simple..
> > in order to prove
> > we are living in a
> > computer simulation
> > you first have to
> > describe people
> > in
> > mathematical terms.
> >
> > Nature's math is simple.
> >
> > zero, one
> >
> > I will soon show you
> > a mathematical model
> > of people in 0,1
> > using photograph illustration.
> >
> > It is indisputable.
> 
> Not only do you have to
> show the mathematical model, but
> also the language needs to be
> converted so that others
> can understand in which they
> are more fimilar with.
> 
> For example:
> 
> 0,1
> zero, one
> negative, positive
> Left, Right
> etc, etc..
> 
> Now, before I explain
> How a person is divided
> in half from head to toe,
> left, right
> 0, 1
> 
> I'll start from
> what you're most
> familiar with...
> 
> or, the 'scientific community'
> incomplete findings:
> 
> http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> 
> The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
> but not the whole rest of the body.
> 
> http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> 
> I have to fill in their missing parts..
> 
> I will provide the missing parts soon,
> but first before I do..you need to be
> more familiar with what is already known.
> 
> http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg
> 
> I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
> right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.
> 
> But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
> not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
> I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
> living in a computer simulated universe,
> so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.
> 
> You people are to close to the trees to see the
> computer...



"A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face. 
A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."




Left - false smile

right - genuine smile


left =  0
right = 1

left = minus
right - plus

left = negative
right = positive

Left - false smile

right - genuine smile

left = bad
right = good

left =  zero
right = one

> > in order to prove
> > we are living in a
> > computer simulation
> > you first have to
> > describe people
> > in
> > mathematical terms.
> >
> > zero, one

to be continued...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web