Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #479519

Re: "Einstein's Bad"

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: "Einstein's Bad"
Date 2018-12-10 13:08 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <pulogj$vd2$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <MeLOD.9248$Xv2.466@fx01.am4> <g73btqF9feaU1@mid.individual.net> <Jb3PD.293951$el1.208051@fx34.am4> <pukd07$ght$1@pcls7.std.com> <iyrPD.474247$1C7.405723@fx38.am4>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> writes:

>On 10/12/2018 00:45, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Keith Stein writes: 


>>> " 1. Newton's equations are invariant under x' = x - vt
>>>       but Maxwell's equation aren't." Einstein 

>>>   .... not true eh!

>> No it is true, and it was a big puzzle of the time why mechanics obeyed
>> the Galilean transform relationships yet Maxwell's equations did not. 
>> They figured they should, since ordinary mechanical relationships on a
>> macroscopic scale are nothing more than electromagnetic relationships at
>> a small (interatomic) scale. Yet Maxwell's equations did not!

>It is true that Maxwell's  equations, as written by Einstein, DO NOT
>"obey the Galilean transform relationships",

And it is true that Maxwell's  equations, as written by Maxwell, do not
obey the Galilean transform relationships.

>Maxwell insisted "A MEDIUM NECESSARY" and he derived an equation which
>gives the velocity of electromagnetic waves RELATIVE TO THE MEDIUM.

Relative to nothing. It was a speed.  Change the frame of reference of the
location, so any "NECESSARY MEDIUM", if relevant, would be moving at a
different speed and show its effect, and the computed speed was unchanged.  
Still relative to nothing. (Besides, Fizeau already showed an extremely
thin medium is practically irrelevant. We can now calculate it as the
diameter of a virus over the earth-sun distance difference!)

>Einstein, on the other hand, omits the medium from Maxwell's equations,

As did Maxwell.

>and obtains an equation which gives the velocity of electromagnetic
>waves RELATIVE TO "NOTHING", which is why Einstein had a "big puzzle".

Maxwell's puzzle not solved until Einstein when he came up with SR and
assumed invariant c as a postulate.

>>> Maxwell was in no doubt that his electromagnetic waves travel
>>> relative to the medium/matter which they travel through,

>> Again, everyone believed in an aether. You can't fault Maxwell for not
>> knowing any better!

>In his long "Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism" Maxwell makes
>no mention of "aether". His primary example of a medium is "air",
>and his only other specific example is "paraffin wax".

So you admit that Maxwell didn't actually refer to any generic medium.

>> No. Maxwell's equations come up with a speed of light, but the equations
>> don't come up with it relative to *anything*. It is just a speed, and
>> Maxwell couldn't figure out what it meant.

>Maxwell never had this problem. He knew perfectly well that
>the speed of light which he derived was RELATIVE TO THE MEDIUM.

He may have assumed it, but he was puzzled how his derived speed was
relative to nothing. Just a speed.

>> For example, there is no math
>> in Maxwell's equations that has the derived speed change if "the medium"
>> happened to move at a certain speed.

>Maxwell certainly knew the answer to this too.

Any of Maxwell's assumptions were just that, assumptions, and not part of
his actual science. Any assumptions of his don't appear in his equations,
he left it as this mysterious speed of light not relative to anything.


> If the speed of
>the wave relative to the medium is w,

Not relevant to Maxwell's equations, its only speed is not relative to 
anything.

> and the speed of the medium
>to you is v, then the speed of the wave relative to you is the
>vector addition of w and v.

Later disproven by Einstein, explaining then-confusing results by Fizeau
and Fresnell.

>> Don't accuse Einstein of believing in something he didn't. Why would he
>> work on SR if he ignored math and claimed Maxwell's equations obeyed
>> Galilean invariance?

>Of course Einstein did not claim that Maxwell's equations obeyed
>Galilean invariance, but that was because he ignored "the medium",

As did Maxwell.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-07 11:15 +0000
  Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-08 11:51 +1100
    Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-08 08:26 +0000
      Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-09 13:11 +1100
        Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-09 07:08 +0000
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-10 00:45 +0000
            Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 10:50 +0000
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-10 13:08 +0000
                 "A MEDIUM NECESSARY" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 11:54 +0000
                Re: "A MEDIUM NECESSARY" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 04:13 -0800
                Re: "A MEDIUM NECESSARY" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 13:17 +0000
                Re: "A MEDIUM NECESSARY" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 23:22 -0800
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 07:51 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 04:21 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 20:49 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 12:55 +0000
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-11 12:59 +1100
            Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 09:55 +0000
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-11 22:33 +1100
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 17:29 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-11 21:14 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 07:45 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-12 03:53 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 16:27 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-12 08:40 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 18:24 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-12 13:47 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Scott Richman <sunn@idhnonow.iv> - 2018-12-13 00:13 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 06:10 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-13 08:18 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 16:46 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-13 18:55 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 14:41 +0000
                Have you ever read Einstein's foundation paper of Special Relativity Henry Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 15:59 +0000
                Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-14 08:11 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 18:19 +0000
                Re: the first 4 equations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-14 13:28 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 14:45 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-14 15:04 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 02:13 +0000
                Re: the first 4 equations JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 19:16 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-14 19:22 -0800
                Re: the first 4 equations Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 06:30 +0000
                Re: the first 4 equations Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 08:38 +0000
                Re: the first 4 equations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-15 07:58 -0800
                Re: three INCOMPATABLE equations Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 17:11 +0000
                Re: three INCOMPATABLE equations "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-15 09:15 -0800
                Re: three INCOMPATABLE equations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-15 14:45 -0800
                Re: three INCOMPATABLE equations Scott Richman <sunn@idhnonow.iv> - 2018-12-16 00:59 +0000
                Re: then there were .......Just 3 equations eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 12:10 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 10:13 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-15 06:49 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 15:47 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-15 08:00 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 17:25 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-15 15:04 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 01:19 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 01:41 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-15 18:57 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 07:12 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 05:45 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 14:34 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-16 15:42 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-16 07:54 -0800
                Re: pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 17:56 +0000
                Re: pathologcal imbecile replies "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-16 10:07 -0800
                Re: pathologcal imbecile replies Scott Richman <sunn@idhnonow.iv> - 2018-12-16 18:57 +0000
                Re: pathologcal imbecile replies "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-16 11:34 -0800
                Re: pathologcal imbecile replies "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-16 11:50 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 13:34 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 22:13 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 15:38 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 01:30 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-15 18:54 -0800
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile replies Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 19:01 +0000
                Re: Keith Stein, pathologcal imbecile continues to be  alying piece of shit "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-16 11:56 -0800
                Re: Have you ever read Einstein's foundation paper of Special Relativity Henry JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 14:20 -0800
                Re: Have you ever read Einstein's foundation paper of Special Relativity Henry Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 09:44 +0000
                Re: Have you ever read Einstein's foundation paper of Special Relativity Henry JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 14:07 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2018-12-14 08:54 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 18:11 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 09:57 -0800
  Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-07 17:08 -0800
    Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-08 08:37 +0000
      Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-08 01:38 -0800
        Re: "Einstein's Bad" Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 18:47 +0000
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 19:17 +0000
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 12:51 -0800
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 12:54 -0800
  "keith stein, Imbecile "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-12-10 06:44 -0800
    Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 16:27 +0000
      Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 16:41 +0000
      Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 21:41 +0000
        Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 05:37 +0000
          Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 05:43 +0000
            Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 08:56 +0000
          Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 13:28 +0000
            Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 16:30 +0000
              Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 19:28 +0000
                Re: The Speed of Light is Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 19:56 +0000
    Re: "keith stein, Imbecile replied: Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 10:32 +0000

csiph-web