Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #408737

Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass?
Date	Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:06:37 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines	47
Message-ID	<o7kvfd$624$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<o7c2ul$scu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o7fvor$rsg$1@news.albasani.net> <o7hb5p$6fm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o7hlpp$rvu$1@news.albasani.net> <o7jnm7$1v8m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host	shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	pcls7.std.com 1486749997 6212 192.74.137.71 (10 Feb 2017 18:06:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:06:37 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	nn/6.6.5
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:408737

Show key headers only | View raw

"HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> writes:

>On 09/02/17 23:03, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> On 09.02.2017 10:01, HGW... DSc. wrote:

>>>> Which we now know is the correct prediction.
>>>
>>> Who knows that? Nobody has verified it. In fact not one aspect of
>>> Einstein's theories has been verified.
>>
>> Newtonian gravitation predicts that
>> the PPN parameter gamma is zero,
>> while GR predicts it is 1.
>>
>> Measurements show:
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
>>   gamma = 0.997 ± 0.003
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
>>   gamma - 1 = (-1.3 ± 5.2) x 10^-5
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
>>   gamma = 0.9998 ± 0.0004
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
>>   gamma = 0.9998 ± 0.0003
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>>   gamma - 1 = (-4.8 ± 5.7) x 10^-5
>>
>> 'nuff said!
>>
>These worthless experiments reveal the lengths to which desperate 
>Einstein supporters will go to try to prove just one aspect of his silly 
>theories correct. They all knew the answer they wanted and incorporated 
>enough approximations and estimates to get close to it.
>Good try, Paul! We know how the Einstein conspirators work.

>There are plenty of simple experiments that show light speed varies. 
>That's all we need to know.

Ralph, tell us why you believe experiments that are so simple that they
don't have the accuracy to tell the difference between c and c±v, yet
you poo-poo the more sophisticated experiments Paul lists that really
can tell the difference, and show that light from a moving source really
does move at c relative to the destination.

Thread

Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-07 20:10 +1100
  Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-07 13:35 +0000
    Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-08 12:27 +1100
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-02-08 02:35 +0100
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-08 04:00 +0000
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:43 -0600
  Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 05:45 -0800
  Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 14:50 -0800
    Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 16:53 -0600
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-09 05:40 +1100
    Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-08 12:30 +1100
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:44 -0600
        Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-09 05:41 +1100
          Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 10:55 -0800
            Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-08 11:14 -0800
            Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-08 13:23 -0800
              Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-02-08 17:39 -0800
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-08 17:54 -0800
  Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-02-08 21:40 +0100
    Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-09 20:01 +1100
      Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-02-09 13:03 +0100
        Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-10 17:47 +1100
          Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-10 09:31 -0600
            Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-11 12:32 +1100
              Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 19:08 -0800
              Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-10 22:37 -0600
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-12 08:38 +1100
          Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-10 18:06 +0000
            Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-11 12:33 +1100
              Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-11 06:16 +0000
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-12 08:42 +1100
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-12 06:07 +0000
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-13 20:31 +1100
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-13 16:31 +0000
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-14 08:45 +1100
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-14 02:42 +0000
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-02-14 20:44 +0100
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 12:23 -0800
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-02-19 11:50 +1100
                Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-18 21:08 -0800
  Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 05:43 -0800

csiph-web