Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401821

Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Lauretta Nagle wrote:

> Pentcho Valev wrote:
> 
>> Quantum gravity is an oxymoron - insane people try to combine Newton's
>> absolute time and Einstein's relative time, the absurd consequence of
>> Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate:
>> 
>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161201-quantum-gravitys-time-problem/
>>  "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means
>>  reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics,
>>  time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving
>>  entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert
>>  Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a
>>  dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z
>>  into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric."
> 
> So, Dr. Mitch Raemesh was correct. There is a 2-time out there. They
> knew it all the time.
> 
> However no, the term is completely moronerous. In my Divergent Matter
> theory there is no need for Time altogether. Because that's primordial,
> all there is, without which, nothing is (can be) present. The Drift.
> Something like this
> 
> W O O O O O S H ... W O O O O O S H ... W O O O O O S H ...
> 
> Something similar to breathing. The Universe starting at W, then ending
> at H. Driven according to my Divergent Matter theory.

It's obvious for anyone, that compared with the Divergent Matter, 
Relativity as a theory is insignificantly infinitesimal. However, make no 
mistakes. The W in the above description contains a lot of Timing and 
Intelligence stuff. Again, "Timing" is just a way of saying it. It is 
rather the DRIFT.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-14 09:14 -0800
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Lauretta Nagle <uattea@aeuatte.au> - 2016-12-14 18:52 +0000
    Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Lauretta Nagle <uattea@aeuatte.au> - 2016-12-14 18:58 +0000
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-14 14:19 -0800
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-15 07:27 +0100
    Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 17:16 -0800
      Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-18 07:21 +0100
        Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 05:00 -0800
          Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 05:39 -0800
          Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-19 02:06 +0100
            Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:15 -0800
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-16 13:43 -0800
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 22:37 -0800
  Re: Is Quantum Gravity an Oxymoron? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-12-20 10:24 -0800

csiph-web