Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #618284
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Pascal and Relativity |
| Date | 2023-08-19 19:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kkcc6jFahscU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <9f416c8f-0fb7-4de3-8bc5-293ac6631721n@googlegroups.com> <ubqfg3$r97g$4@dont-email.me> <14462f70-2ebd-4941-9038-e6591f1bc4f2n@googlegroups.com> <kkcaoqFaadpU1@mid.individual.net> <c18c517a-56b4-4075-9509-73c88035865dn@googlegroups.com> |
On 2023-08-19 17:17:48 +0000, patdolan said: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 10:00:14 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-08-19 16:44:24 +0000, patdolan said:>> > On Saturday, August >> 19, 2023 at 6:19:02 AM UTC-7, Python wrote:> >> patdolan wrote:> > >> Tomorrow is the 361st anniversary of the death of> >> Blaise Pascal.> >> >> > Dr. Hachel, would Pascal have accept relativity,> >> either yours >> or Einstein's?> >> Asking anything to Dr. Lengrand is only making sure >> to get a silly and>> >> stupid answer (and you got it). Whatever the >> subject is!>> Pascal may> >> have enjoyed to read Hachel/Lengrand >> psychotic rant, for> entertainment> >> value, you know? But he would >> also have considered> it for what it is:> >> a total messy nonsense >> produced by a backward> country doctor with a> >> huge narcissistic >> personality disorder in> addition to a disgusting> >> lack of Humanity >> (he enjoy that kids are> killed by the police, for> >> instance) and >> integrity (he publishes lie> upon lie).>> He would also> >> have had >> concerns on that such a charlatan is allowed> to practice> >> medicine >> in France.>> About Einstein Relativy, Blaise Pascal being a> >> >> brilliant geometer he> would have loved SR (and GR). He is one of the> >> >> founder, along with> Desargues and others, a marvelous kind of> >> >> geometry: Projective> Geometry. There, all pairs of lines intersect,> >> >> there is no kind of> distances between points (but there is a> >> >> topology), there you can> permute the word "lines" and "points" (as> >> >> well as "intersects" and "are> aligned") to produce true theorems from> >> >> others proven theorems (this is> called "Pascal's duality"), three> >> >> points on a plane have three> coordinates (called "homogeneous> >> >> coordinates"), etc.>>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_geometry>>> >> >> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9om%C3%A9trie_projective>> Pascal> >> >> would have loved to discover how this generalizes to complex>> >> >> coordinates, he would have loved also Minkowsky's geometry (something>> >> >> that our stupid doctor Hachel despises, while not understanding it,> >> as> >> usual) as it is basically a physical application of hyperbolic>> >> >> geometry. Conics everywhere! He would have loved that!>> But you >> are> >> already lost, aren't you Pat?>> Another fun fact about Pascal: >> during> >> the XIXth century a scammer> made up false letters "proving" >> that> >> Newton plagiarized Pascal. He> ended up convincing the >> mathematician> >> Chasles. This is especially> surprising when you look >> at their dates of> >> birth and death :> Pascal: 1623-1662, and Newton: >> 1642-1727!>> See:>>> >> https://www.jstor.org/stable/4028215>>> >> >> https://www.canalacademies.com/emissions/au-fil-des-pages/newton-a-t-il-plagie-pascal> >> >>> > Python, in contrast to PAB, I will continue to always read Dr. >> Hachel.> > I find Dr. Hachel to be one of the finest exports from >> France since> > French Fries. >> French fries came from Belgium, but the Americans who invented that> >> name thought that Brussels was in France. If their successors had> >> realized they weren't actually French they wouldn't have had to rename> >> them Freedom fries when Jacques Chirac refused to support W's >> adventure> in Iraq. Even people (like me) who weren't keen on Chirac in >> general> were overwhelmingly on his side on that issue. >>> I will have a look at your several interesting links. Mathematic is> > >>> almost as wonderful a tool for composing fiction as English prose. As> >>> > for his idiosyncrasies, they obviously point to his direct descent >>> from> > the Emperor.> > Corollary to "every pair of lines intersect" -- >>> the tangents to every> > pair of lines are parallel at some point. >> -- >> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots > Well then Athel, you are a Trump man now, oui? Golly. You're even crazier than I already realized. I won't bother to comment on the raving below. > 45 was against the Iraq invasion, as am I (now but not then). Iraq > was the DC deep state swamp at its filthiest. When you see the poor > legless, armless, faceless veterans (not to mention the dead ones) > patriotic citizen soldiers who sacrificed so much just so both R and D > swamp creatures could get hefty campaign contributions for the defense > contractor, it now sickens me. > And of course, Athel, you are a Trump man because of Ukraine, oui? > Trump prevented that war from happening during his first term and has > promised to end it in the first 24 hours of his administration. And > Tump has never failed to keep a campaign promise. Joe, Mitch and the > Swamp are hellbent to escalate to nukes. You are closer to ground zero > than me. When they hose your vaporize ashes off the ground, do you > know what crooked Joe will say? Same response as Lahaina, "No comment" -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-18 11:53 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-18 20:23 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-08-19 09:51 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-19 12:08 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-19 15:18 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-19 15:30 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Emilio Zhimerin <znzi@rriemrom.ii> - 2023-08-19 13:40 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 09:44 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:00 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:08 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:35 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 13:11 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-20 17:40 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 11:06 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:24 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 10:20 -0400
Re: Pascal and Relativity nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-21 09:46 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Samsath Grosse <ohsh@smahhhas.ma> - 2023-08-23 09:58 +0000
csiph-web