Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614962
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A light clock that works. |
| Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:54:01 -0500 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <kh3r1rFaigoU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <e242a962-299e-472b-b1af-9cd2a682441cn@googlegroups.com> <kh2aruF323qU1@mid.individual.net> <e4d1263c-19d5-43be-a0c1-fb4220a38d05n@googlegroups.com> <kh2evqF3oq5U1@mid.individual.net> <1ef8da5b-ef9d-4487-807b-175ca855d312n@googlegroups.com> <kh2hoeF3oq2U1@mid.individual.net> <9e108ea9-8d6b-4b22-8dbc-5d16a4ffad7bn@googlegroups.com> <kh3p94Fabl0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 8b9yvj/BPqqYWWp3m4XbAwc0dsBHKsZHYX2vIVlGaiNlFvr+1F |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:ejCe++QlPki7xK1KIZUw+alg86c= sha256:KUSujYu/D4EYY8MXXpb+JmLJK+JDWLN4E0je6b/WWfg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <kh3p94Fabl0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614962 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 7/10/2023 8:23 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 11-July-23 1:19 am, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: <...> >>>> How needlessly you complicate matters. The observer reading the >>>> light clock is inside the ship. >>> So what do you mean by "travelling at near the speed of light"? How >>> would someone determine that they were, or were not, travelling at near >>> the speed of light? >>> >>> Sylvia. >> There is only one geometry. The actual path of the light. Objective >> reality sans subjectivism. > > You appear to unable to answer even simple questions about the > terminology you used. Haven't you noticed the patterns?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 10:56 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:11 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:02 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:21 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:04 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:29 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:39 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:53 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 16:13 -0500
Re: A light clock that works. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 22:54 +0200
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 15:06 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:25 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 21:08 -0500
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 09:32 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:49 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:53 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 14:16 -0500
Re: A light clock that works. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-10 11:13 +0300
Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 01:42 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 22:11 +1000
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:12 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:22 +1000
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:58 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 00:09 +1000
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:11 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:22 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 14:32 +0000
Re: A light clock that works. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:56 +0200
Re: A light clock that works. Jhon-Jhairo Papadopulos <drao@ohuholsj.jo> - 2023-07-10 17:28 +0000
Re: A light clock that works. Pablo Sfakianos <lsop@saikfiof.sn> - 2023-07-10 19:45 +0000
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 08:19 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 11:23 +1000
Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:54 -0500
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:10 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2023-07-10 21:52 +0200
Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-11 10:56 -0700
Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 18:17 +0000
Re: A light clock that works. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-11 13:22 -0500
Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 13:02 -0700
csiph-web