Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614962

Re: A light clock that works.

From whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: A light clock that works.
Date 2023-07-10 20:54 -0500
Message-ID <kh3r1rFaigoU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <kh2evqF3oq5U1@mid.individual.net> <1ef8da5b-ef9d-4487-807b-175ca855d312n@googlegroups.com> <kh2hoeF3oq2U1@mid.individual.net> <9e108ea9-8d6b-4b22-8dbc-5d16a4ffad7bn@googlegroups.com> <kh3p94Fabl0U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/10/2023 8:23 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 11-July-23 1:19 am, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:

<...>

>>>> How needlessly you complicate matters. The observer reading the 
>>>> light clock is inside the ship.
>>> So what do you mean by "travelling at near the speed of light"? How
>>> would someone determine that they were, or were not, travelling at near
>>> the speed of light?
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>> There is only one geometry. The actual path of the light. Objective 
>> reality sans subjectivism.
> 
> You appear to unable to answer even simple questions about the 
> terminology you used.

Haven't you noticed the patterns?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 10:56 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:11 -0700
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:02 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:21 -0700
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:04 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:29 -0700
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:39 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:53 -0700
            Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 16:13 -0500
  Re: A light clock that works. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 22:54 +0200
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 15:06 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:25 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 21:08 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 09:32 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:49 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:53 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 14:16 -0500
  Re: A light clock that works. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-10 11:13 +0300
    Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 01:42 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 22:11 +1000
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:12 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:22 +1000
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:58 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 00:09 +1000
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:11 -0700
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:22 -0700
              Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 14:32 +0000
                Re: A light clock that works. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:56 +0200
                Re: A light clock that works. Jhon-Jhairo Papadopulos <drao@ohuholsj.jo> - 2023-07-10 17:28 +0000
                Re: A light clock that works. Pablo Sfakianos <lsop@saikfiof.sn> - 2023-07-10 19:45 +0000
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 08:19 -0700
              Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 11:23 +1000
                Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:54 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:10 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2023-07-10 21:52 +0200
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-11 10:56 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 18:17 +0000
      Re: A light clock that works. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-11 13:22 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 13:02 -0700

csiph-web