Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614912

Re: A light clock that works.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2023-07-10 14:32:27 +0000, "Dr." Richard Hachel said:

>>> 
>>> [ … ]
>>> 
> Certainly, but in Dr. Hachel's ship, there is no absolute frame of 
> reference (like a fixed and immutable ether).

All very interesting, but you still haven't revealed where you earned 
your doctorate.
> 
> If we admit that the universe does not exist, and that there are no 
> stars, no planets, but only a rocket that wanders in the empty and 
> infinite spaces.
> 
> It is clear that she would not move, nor could she be moved.
> 
> Not everything is "sex".
> 
> Look at Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
> 
> Wonderful Walt Disney movie.
> 
> But where are the space and the time during which we shot the film? 
> Where is the house that served as a spatial support?
> 
> But no, it's just colors on film.
> 
> There is nothing absolute here.
> 
> Same in our universe. Everything is only by comparisons of colors of 
> distances, of time.
> 
> But no absolute reference.
> 
> Let's take the notion of speed: which of A or B is really going faster?
> 
> A is at rest, and says that it is B who moves and therefore goes faster.
> 
> B looks at A wryly and says: "No, you're the one going faster!".
> 
> R.H.


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 10:56 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:11 -0700
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:02 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:21 -0700
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:04 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:29 -0700
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:39 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:53 -0700
            Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 16:13 -0500
  Re: A light clock that works. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 22:54 +0200
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 15:06 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:25 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 21:08 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 09:32 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:49 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:53 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 14:16 -0500
  Re: A light clock that works. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-10 11:13 +0300
    Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 01:42 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 22:11 +1000
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:12 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:22 +1000
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 06:58 -0700
          Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 00:09 +1000
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:11 -0700
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:22 -0700
              Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 14:32 +0000
                Re: A light clock that works. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:56 +0200
                Re: A light clock that works. Jhon-Jhairo Papadopulos <drao@ohuholsj.jo> - 2023-07-10 17:28 +0000
                Re: A light clock that works. Pablo Sfakianos <lsop@saikfiof.sn> - 2023-07-10 19:45 +0000
            Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 08:19 -0700
              Re: A light clock that works. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-11 11:23 +1000
                Re: A light clock that works. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:54 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-10 07:10 -0700
  Re: A light clock that works. wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2023-07-10 21:52 +0200
    Re: A light clock that works. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-11 10:56 -0700
      Re: A light clock that works. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 18:17 +0000
      Re: A light clock that works. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-11 13:22 -0500
        Re: A light clock that works. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 13:02 -0700

csiph-web