Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373652
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion |
| Date | 2016-01-11 11:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dfgbpjFblk4U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <39ad35c6-168a-45d4-806c-e87c3e7f1c12@googlegroups.com> <dfe0a5Fnnj2U1@mid.individual.net> <dfe0j9Fnp9aU1@mid.individual.net> <abf97a4d-81c1-409f-9b73-441778c300fc@googlegroups.com> |
On 11/01/2016 4:42 AM, John Gogo wrote: > On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 9:13:47 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 10/01/2016 2:08 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 4/01/2016 9:15 AM, John Gogo wrote: >>>> Is there any difference? >>>> >>> >>> There's no similarity. >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> Oh wait, I was wrong. There is a similarity. >> >> Neither of them exist. >> >> Sylvia. > > In terms of the measuring objects which are observed but where no > local clocks exist- are we able to rid ourselves the notion of > perpetual motion where there is no beginning or end of measure? > We can rid ourselves of the notion of perpetual motion. There's no need for a caveat. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 14:15 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-03 22:52 +0000
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 16:32 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 17:51 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-10 14:08 +1100
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-10 14:13 +1100
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 10:55 +0100
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 09:42 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 12:31 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-11 11:37 +1100
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 20:08 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-12 22:16 +1100
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:48 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:50 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:59 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 20:01 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 19:06 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 19:08 -0800
Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 20:27 -0800
csiph-web