Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373750

Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion
Date	2016-01-12 22:16 +1100
Message-ID	<dfk5jpFa5s5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <dfe0a5Fnnj2U1@mid.individual.net> <dfe0j9Fnp9aU1@mid.individual.net> <abf97a4d-81c1-409f-9b73-441778c300fc@googlegroups.com> <dfgbpjFblk4U2@mid.individual.net> <c8f4a160-b57b-4613-8485-d450033e1937@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/01/2016 3:08 PM, John Gogo wrote:
> On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 6:37:10 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 11/01/2016 4:42 AM, John Gogo wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 9:13:47 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2016 2:08 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 4/01/2016 9:15 AM, John Gogo wrote:
>>>>>> Is there any difference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no similarity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>
>>>> Oh wait, I was wrong. There is a similarity.
>>>>
>>>> Neither of them exist.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> In terms of the measuring objects which are observed but where
>>> no local clocks exist- are we able to rid ourselves the notion
>>> of perpetual motion where there is no beginning or end of
>>> measure?
>>>
>>
>> We can rid ourselves of the notion of perpetual motion. There's no
>> need for a caveat.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Are you saying that our clocks are now evolved enough to rid
> ourselves of the  problem of objects which "show" no beginning or
> end- yet we have no man-made clock stationed there?
>

I haven't said anything about clocks.

Sylvia.

Thread

Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 14:15 -0800
  Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-03 22:52 +0000
    Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 16:32 -0800
      Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 17:51 -0800
  Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-10 14:08 +1100
    Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-10 14:13 +1100
      Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 10:55 +0100
      Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 09:42 -0800
        Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 12:31 -0800
        Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-11 11:37 +1100
          Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 20:08 -0800
            Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-12 22:16 +1100
              Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:48 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:50 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 19:59 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 20:01 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 19:06 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 19:08 -0800
                Re: Perpetual motion vs. absolute motion John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 20:27 -0800

csiph-web