Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674179
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.usage.english, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.tv |
| Subject | Re: The proof is in the pudding, or where to get physical dictionaries of idioms? |
| Date | Sun, 04 Oct 2026 11:18:02 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 31 |
| Message-ID | <6AC2985A.5560@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <W1jwS.2282$wun8.969@fx13.ams4> <119t0n4$3n070$2@dont-email.me> <119t7sq$3pisr$1@dont-email.me> <DhqwS.4997$AEj4.762@fx17.ams4> <119tcua$3rfop$1@dont-email.me> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 04 Oct 2026 18:18:00 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; logging-data="174799"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18NA074SP4UyTcIMX+vnK4Cbibb10UWVNc="; posting-host="5fbf0bb8224ee729fba270fdec923b5a" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:FNNJ3QRbDFDZwfRr0BMoL9S8vr0= sha256:egTvD6Y9KLSFuD/VoKWGfpGuxNykr8zq/rXmDvJ24Cc= sha1:vb9GFPd0YKdv3os1TwQI4bzL4v4= sha256:mwySNw0w2gdwUPlTAUkVcTR4Im6p3rUZvkJs6M6ZKc8= |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 261004-6, 10/04/2026), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.usage.english:1151801 sci.physics.relativity:674179 rec.arts.tv:1858781 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: > > Den 04.10.2026 kl. 12.56 skrev Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson: > > >>>> So, what do posters of alt.usage.english suggest? > >>> > >>> Read books by English writers. > >> > >> And be suspicious of what you read on the web. > >> > > > > And books. Though I don't have a read made example of an error in a > > book with an English author. > > If you just want to pick up idiomatic expressions, you don't have to > worry about spelling errors. This is actually coming from a alt.usage.english newsgroup!!! Fack It! > > -- > Bertel, Kolt, Danmark -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The proof is in the pudding, or where to get physical dictionaries of idioms? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 11:18 -0700
csiph-web