Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674179
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usage.english, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.tv |
| Subject | Re: The proof is in the pudding, or where to get physical dictionaries of idioms? |
| Date | 2026-10-04 11:18 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6AC2985A.5560@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <W1jwS.2282$wun8.969@fx13.ams4> <119t0n4$3n070$2@dont-email.me> <119t7sq$3pisr$1@dont-email.me> <DhqwS.4997$AEj4.762@fx17.ams4> <119tcua$3rfop$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: > > Den 04.10.2026 kl. 12.56 skrev Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson: > > >>>> So, what do posters of alt.usage.english suggest? > >>> > >>> Read books by English writers. > >> > >> And be suspicious of what you read on the web. > >> > > > > And books. Though I don't have a read made example of an error in a > > book with an English author. > > If you just want to pick up idiomatic expressions, you don't have to > worry about spelling errors. This is actually coming from a alt.usage.english newsgroup!!! Fack It! > > -- > Bertel, Kolt, Danmark -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The proof is in the pudding, or where to get physical dictionaries of idioms? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 11:18 -0700
csiph-web