Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #464771

Re: No Explanation for the Sun

Message-ID	<5B4EECC2.3BAE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2018-07-18 00:31 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: No Explanation for the Sun
References	<e71e0bc7-45f2-4955-9ec3-5817b08d9ba1@googlegroups.com> <5B4BCEC1.2498@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Mark Earnest wrote:
> >
> > No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
> >
> > years.
> 
> the universe goes from hot to cold as ice...
> 
> before the big bang, it was in the reverse state..
> from cold to hot.
> 

like a mirror version...

if the big bang were to look
at itself in the mirror..

it would see..

look at your hands..

now face one hand towards the mirror

if you look at other hand..

they now both match.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
  Re: No Explanation for the Sun Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-16 12:42 +0000
    Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-17 10:15 -0700
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Otto Snook <uot@wuoluo.uc> - 2018-07-17 17:53 +0000
  Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-18 00:31 -0700

csiph-web