Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #494998
| Message-ID | <5B4EECC2.3BAE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 00:31 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: No Explanation for the Sun |
| References | <e71e0bc7-45f2-4955-9ec3-5817b08d9ba1@googlegroups.com> <5B4BCEC1.2498@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > Mark Earnest wrote: > > > > No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion > > > > years. > > the universe goes from hot to cold as ice... > > before the big bang, it was in the reverse state.. > from cold to hot. > like a mirror version... if the big bang were to look at itself in the mirror.. it would see.. look at your hands.. now face one hand towards the mirror if you look at other hand.. they now both match.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-18 00:31 -0700
Re: No Explanation for the Sun benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:12 -0400
csiph-web