Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #464497

Re: No Explanation for the Sun

Message-ID	<5B4BCEC1.2498@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: No Explanation for the Sun
References	<e71e0bc7-45f2-4955-9ec3-5817b08d9ba1@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Mark Earnest wrote:
> 
> No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
> 
> years.

the universe goes from hot to cold as ice...

before the big bang, it was in the reverse state..
from cold to hot.

Now, our sun takes a little longer to turn to an ice cube.

In other words, women live longer than men.

they are lighter
have squeaky voices
and as cold as ice..
but give a lot more warmth.

i no tink you get the connection...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
  Re: No Explanation for the Sun Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-16 12:42 +0000
    Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-17 10:15 -0700
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Otto Snook <uot@wuoluo.uc> - 2018-07-17 17:53 +0000
  Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-18 00:31 -0700

csiph-web