Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #430485

Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view
Date 2017-08-30 10:06 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <59A6F0A5.355A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <f0jaedF3jeoU1@mid.individual.net> <59A50D29.267D@ix.netcom.com> <f0ladbFhbk1U1@mid.individual.net> <59A5A770.63EC@ix.netcom.com> <59A6E9E6.7063@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 29.08.2017 um 08:43 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Am 28.08.2017 um 21:22 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > >> ..
> > > >>>>> In a very brief nutshell, all "things" have been replaced by fields
> > > >>>>> which extend over ALL space and time. They don't live IN space and time
> > > >>>>> like you imagine particles or ping pong balls. They are part of the
> > > >>>>> fabric OF space and time.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> There are ripples in these fields, which have behavior constrained by
> > > >>>>> symmetries of nature, which are more fundamental in a deep sense than
> > > >>>>> the conservation laws of nature.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Well, I do in fact agree upon most parts. But I am an amateur and have
> > > >>>> written about , what you think, that amateurs are unable to understand.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It's mainly my own invention, (thou influenced by a couple of people).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I call it 'structured spacetime' and you can read about it here:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I have written this 'book' about eight years ago and have since then
> > > >>>> tried to find some audience for my idea. Didn't really work. But I still
> > > >>>> think, the concept is correct.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> TH
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The Big Dipper and the little dipper is an example of...'structured spacetime'.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> ??
> > > >>
> > > >> Actually I had tried to connect GR and QM in this way:
> > > >>
> > > >> I take spacetime of GR for granted and build particles out of that (to
> > > >> replicate QM from the 'GR side').
> > > >>
> > > >> This is actually possible. I assume, that spacetime consists of the
> > > >> equivalent of a point, called 'elements' (of spacetime). These elements
> > > >> are kind of points with features.
> > > >>
> > > >> These elements are connected similar to how quaternions are multiplied.
> > > >>
> > > >> By this the state of an element is conserved in time. This builds
> > > >> 'timelike stable patterns' and those are, what we call matter.
> > > >>
> > > >> IOW particles are not real, but more like patterns or structures.
> > > >>
> > > >> As proof of concept I wanted to use 'Growing Earth'.
> > > >>
> > > >> So I spent a good part of the last year in the attempt to prove GE.
> > > >>
> > > >> TH
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you're seeking an audience for 'Growing Earth...
> > > >
> > > > you have to use search and replace to redo it
> > > > and replace keywords with 'climate change',
> > > > explaining how climate change is causeing a
> > > > 'Growing Earth'.
> > > >
> > > No. It's the other way round: Growing Earth is changing the climate.
> > >
> > > The 'climate change' is actually among the hints for 'Growing Earth'.
> > >
> > > This is because 'climate' means 'the average type of whether (and other
> > > atmospheric factors) at a certain spot'.
> > >
> > > So: the change of climate over a long period of time at - say - Timbuktu
> > > is 'climate change' (in Timbuktu).
> > >
> > > Now we know, that many places in the Sahara had been much greener a few
> > > thousand years ago.
> > >
> > > Before there was green land, there have been marshes and before that,
> > > the Sahara was the bottom of an ocean.
> > >
> > > So the amount of water changed over long time spans and that is, what we
> > > call 'climate change'.
> > >
> > > This sinking sea-level is caused by the expanding planet, where the
> > > surface builds cracks and rifts. Into these rifts the water flows and
> > > the sea-level sink.
> > >
> > > Another effect from Growing Earth is the increasing heat inside the
> > > planet, what generates more heat on the surface. This does also alter
> > > the climate in many places.
> > >
> > > TH
> >
> > that's what I meant, how climate change is causeing a
> >  'Growing Earth', or  Growing Earth is changing the climate.
> >
> > i don't know if you have the keywords "climate change" in your 'Growing Earth' doc.
> >
> > I only suggest if you didn't, you can add it to your doc.
> >
> > Like for example, you can say Growing Earth is causing "cancer".
> >
> > You just do a search and replace on [KEYWORD] to tailor your audience.
> 
> Like for example, NASA says "water is key to life as we know it".
> 
> But that isn't true. There is no proof that where there is water there
> is life.
> 
> But, it is the [KEYWORD] that NASA uses to get funding.

In other words, it's not enough to say 'Growing Earth', you have to attach a "doomsday" to it. 

Killer Asteroids!

The Big One Is Coming!


KILLER EARTH!



You sell the sizzle, not the steak.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 17:28 -0500
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-08-25 15:42 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-25 19:17 -0500
    Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-26 01:50 -0400
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 09:07 -0500
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-26 08:03 -0700
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 10:43 -0500
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 09:13 -0700
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 11:26 -0500
            Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:43 -0400
              Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-27 11:41 -0500
                Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-28 16:23 -0400
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:35 -0400
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:31 -0400
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 17:01 -0500
            Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 18:53 -0400
              Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-27 10:20 -0500
                Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-28 16:21 -0400
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 22:52 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-25 23:51 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-26 12:00 +0000
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-26 16:19 +0000
    Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 14:25 -0500
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 13:38 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-08-26 13:01 -0700
    Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 15:23 -0500
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-08-27 00:00 -0700
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 16:59 -0500
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 10:55 -0700
            Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-28 11:09 -0700
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 01:33 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-08-26 14:43 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 15:57 -0700
    Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 17:08 -0700
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 18:00 -0700
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 19:15 -0700
  Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-28 21:11 +0200
    Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 12:22 -0700
      Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-28 21:49 +0200
        Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 23:43 -0700
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-29 16:01 +0200
            Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-29 10:42 -0700
              Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-30 09:37 -0700
                Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-30 10:06 -0700
                Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-30 21:45 +0200
          Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-09-02 12:46 -0700
            Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-03 22:32 +0200

csiph-web