Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #430485
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view |
| Date | 2017-08-30 10:06 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <59A6F0A5.355A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <f0jaedF3jeoU1@mid.individual.net> <59A50D29.267D@ix.netcom.com> <f0ladbFhbk1U1@mid.individual.net> <59A5A770.63EC@ix.netcom.com> <59A6E9E6.7063@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > Am 29.08.2017 um 08:43 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Am 28.08.2017 um 21:22 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >> .. > > > >>>>> In a very brief nutshell, all "things" have been replaced by fields > > > >>>>> which extend over ALL space and time. They don't live IN space and time > > > >>>>> like you imagine particles or ping pong balls. They are part of the > > > >>>>> fabric OF space and time. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> There are ripples in these fields, which have behavior constrained by > > > >>>>> symmetries of nature, which are more fundamental in a deep sense than > > > >>>>> the conservation laws of nature. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Well, I do in fact agree upon most parts. But I am an amateur and have > > > >>>> written about , what you think, that amateurs are unable to understand. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It's mainly my own invention, (thou influenced by a couple of people). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I call it 'structured spacetime' and you can read about it here: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I have written this 'book' about eight years ago and have since then > > > >>>> tried to find some audience for my idea. Didn't really work. But I still > > > >>>> think, the concept is correct. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> TH > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> The Big Dipper and the little dipper is an example of...'structured spacetime'. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> ?? > > > >> > > > >> Actually I had tried to connect GR and QM in this way: > > > >> > > > >> I take spacetime of GR for granted and build particles out of that (to > > > >> replicate QM from the 'GR side'). > > > >> > > > >> This is actually possible. I assume, that spacetime consists of the > > > >> equivalent of a point, called 'elements' (of spacetime). These elements > > > >> are kind of points with features. > > > >> > > > >> These elements are connected similar to how quaternions are multiplied. > > > >> > > > >> By this the state of an element is conserved in time. This builds > > > >> 'timelike stable patterns' and those are, what we call matter. > > > >> > > > >> IOW particles are not real, but more like patterns or structures. > > > >> > > > >> As proof of concept I wanted to use 'Growing Earth'. > > > >> > > > >> So I spent a good part of the last year in the attempt to prove GE. > > > >> > > > >> TH > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're seeking an audience for 'Growing Earth... > > > > > > > > you have to use search and replace to redo it > > > > and replace keywords with 'climate change', > > > > explaining how climate change is causeing a > > > > 'Growing Earth'. > > > > > > > No. It's the other way round: Growing Earth is changing the climate. > > > > > > The 'climate change' is actually among the hints for 'Growing Earth'. > > > > > > This is because 'climate' means 'the average type of whether (and other > > > atmospheric factors) at a certain spot'. > > > > > > So: the change of climate over a long period of time at - say - Timbuktu > > > is 'climate change' (in Timbuktu). > > > > > > Now we know, that many places in the Sahara had been much greener a few > > > thousand years ago. > > > > > > Before there was green land, there have been marshes and before that, > > > the Sahara was the bottom of an ocean. > > > > > > So the amount of water changed over long time spans and that is, what we > > > call 'climate change'. > > > > > > This sinking sea-level is caused by the expanding planet, where the > > > surface builds cracks and rifts. Into these rifts the water flows and > > > the sea-level sink. > > > > > > Another effect from Growing Earth is the increasing heat inside the > > > planet, what generates more heat on the surface. This does also alter > > > the climate in many places. > > > > > > TH > > > > that's what I meant, how climate change is causeing a > > 'Growing Earth', or Growing Earth is changing the climate. > > > > i don't know if you have the keywords "climate change" in your 'Growing Earth' doc. > > > > I only suggest if you didn't, you can add it to your doc. > > > > Like for example, you can say Growing Earth is causing "cancer". > > > > You just do a search and replace on [KEYWORD] to tailor your audience. > > Like for example, NASA says "water is key to life as we know it". > > But that isn't true. There is no proof that where there is water there > is life. > > But, it is the [KEYWORD] that NASA uses to get funding. In other words, it's not enough to say 'Growing Earth', you have to attach a "doomsday" to it. Killer Asteroids! The Big One Is Coming! KILLER EARTH! You sell the sizzle, not the steak.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 17:28 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-08-25 15:42 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-25 19:17 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-26 01:50 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 09:07 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-26 08:03 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 10:43 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 09:13 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 11:26 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:43 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-27 11:41 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-28 16:23 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:35 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 17:31 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-26 17:01 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-26 18:53 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-27 10:20 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-28 16:21 -0400
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 22:52 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-25 23:51 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-26 12:00 +0000
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-26 16:19 +0000
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 14:25 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-26 13:38 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-08-26 13:01 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-08-27 00:00 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 16:59 -0500
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 10:55 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-28 11:09 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 01:33 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-08-26 14:43 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 15:57 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 17:08 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 18:00 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-26 19:15 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-28 21:11 +0200
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 12:22 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-28 21:49 +0200
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-28 23:43 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-29 16:01 +0200
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-29 10:42 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-30 09:37 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-30 10:06 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-30 21:45 +0200
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-09-02 12:46 -0700
Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-03 22:32 +0200
csiph-web