Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #423522

Re: "Einstein's Philosophy"

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money
> > > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the
> > > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo
> > > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because
> > > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works
> > > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course.
> > >
> > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
> > > c(V)=c+V
> > > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite
> > > with infinite possibilities and potentials.
> >
> > I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is.
> 
> I thought I had made myself clear.
> >
> > It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals
> > mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the
> > way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of
> > mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of
> > momentum is an evil man.
> 
> No. That is not my point. The originator of the law of conservation of
> momentum was a very good man. He did his work with mechanical systems. The
> law worked very well indeed with mechanical systems. Of that there is no
> doubt.
> 
> My point is that electrical systems do not necessarily follow the law of
> conservation of momentum. To that end I have performed some original experiments
> and I believe that in a genuinely scientific environment these experiments
> have to be carefully analysed and repeated.
> 
> As I have often shown, they are to be found in:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
> IFE - 2 Experimental setups
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
> IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
> IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
> IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
> IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
> IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
> IFE - 8 New Physics
> 
> My source of discomfort lies in my getting ignored. That causes discomfort.
> 
> Thus the evil lies in ignoring my work. And thus continuing with old ideas
> which have their own space, but should not be used to block new findings.
> 
> >
> > It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything
> > incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the
> > common man.
> 
> No, relativity is not incomprehensible to me and it should not be
> incomprehensible to anyone. We should all know that it is based upon a bungle
> in the analysis of the MMI experiment which I pointed out in 2005.
> 
> Relativity is simply wrong. To pass of something wrong as right is evil. It is
> an evil to which every person on Earth except a few like myself takes part.
> 
> Evil does not do good, so it causes discomfort. In this case it lets frauds
> run the roost and they will employ fellow frauds, so the whole system is
> corrupt to the core. Knowing this, it is futile to publish in the journals, as
> they will reject on dogmatic grounds. Still, video is there, youtube is there,
> you are there and I am here, so I published my findings on youtube in a manner
> that I believe should convince honest and intelligent minds.
> 
> And that is a cause for discomfort.
> >
> > It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like
> > quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary
> > Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how.
> 
> Nuclear power plants can be explained very well by my equation
> e=0.5mVVN(N-k). As are atom bombs. They are based upon extending Newtonian
> ideas, with my addition that internal force existence creates and destroys
> energy. This formula explains the workings of the universe very elegantly, and
> my new ideas in physics are explained in IFE-8.
> 
> So dom't say "I am not quite sure how". My original ideas support Newton
> fully - they extend Newtonian ideas into the field of electrodynamics.
> 
> > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science.
> 
> Calling one an anti-Semite (and thus an honorary Nazi) is an old trick and
> a give-away.
> 
> It has been applied to me often enough in the past. The last resort, what, after
> failing miserably to find the slightest fault in my works, let alone my
> character.
> 
> Even if there are no brave and intelligent people to take up my science today,
> I do my work in the expectation that this situation cannot last for ever.
> 
> Because true science is for the ages. It will always have appeal to those
> seeking truth. They will not be influenced by your smear tactics.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
> >
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables


Pay no mind to the Odd Bodkin, he believes telling the Truth is...anti-semitism.

In Odd Bodkin's book...if you tell the truth you're an anti-Semite. 


Actually "anti-Semitism" doesn't exist. It's just an "invention" by
Jewish people to suffocate and strangle your free speech whenever you have a criticism about
Jewish people in any shape of form or manner. 

In otherwords, It's okay to criticise everyone in the world *except* "them".
But the truth is, "anti-Semitism" does not exist in this world... 
..it only exist in the mind of a Jewish person.

It doesn't exist anywhere else.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700
  Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-25 15:46 -0700
    Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 22:49 -0700
  Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-26 00:05 -0700
  Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:17 -0700
  Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:34 -0700
    Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-27 00:30 -0700
    Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-27 10:04 -0700
      Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-27 23:10 -0700
  Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Gibutsi Fumihazu <uft@wwhm.cu> - 2017-07-01 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:45 -0700
    Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 16:34 -0400

csiph-web