Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:16:57 -0500 Message-ID: <5951F85C.39A2@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:17:00 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.written,alt.astronomy,sci.philosophy.relativity Subject: Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" References: <594FF1F9.6F99@ix.netcom.com> <69b35d8a-0078-4633-8012-1aab4b8967dc@googlegroups.com> <084f858e-7567-4a00-a319-dd8b168c76c6@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170626-4, 06/26/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 141 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-fpJC3KilHFdD5j60sLHjWtE2Aq1JdhRBuSSeC6h0ls7VCTgQg/4GttSAIlxPnXGls3Ti+JVF15tQaYo!oXPDlLeYL6Pi70uyqqyhaBbqUUJbsnjOokyR4ZXyK3zCqtpYbWcwjbknF9tstui4ndWymIzRTDZU!H/jjGBL/bbE= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 7561 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:423522 sci.physics:637894 rec.arts.sf.written:473947 alt.astronomy:291705 Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money > > > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the > > > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo > > > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because > > > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works > > > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. > > > > > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Arindam Banerjee > > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k) > > > c(V)=c+V > > > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite > > > with infinite possibilities and potentials. > > > > I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is. > > I thought I had made myself clear. > > > > It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals > > mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the > > way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of > > mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of > > momentum is an evil man. > > No. That is not my point. The originator of the law of conservation of > momentum was a very good man. He did his work with mechanical systems. The > law worked very well indeed with mechanical systems. Of that there is no > doubt. > > My point is that electrical systems do not necessarily follow the law of > conservation of momentum. To that end I have performed some original experiments > and I believe that in a genuinely scientific environment these experiments > have to be carefully analysed and repeated. > > As I have often shown, they are to be found in: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s > IFE - 2 Experimental setups > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY > IFE - 8 New Physics > > My source of discomfort lies in my getting ignored. That causes discomfort. > > Thus the evil lies in ignoring my work. And thus continuing with old ideas > which have their own space, but should not be used to block new findings. > > > > > It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything > > incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the > > common man. > > No, relativity is not incomprehensible to me and it should not be > incomprehensible to anyone. We should all know that it is based upon a bungle > in the analysis of the MMI experiment which I pointed out in 2005. > > Relativity is simply wrong. To pass of something wrong as right is evil. It is > an evil to which every person on Earth except a few like myself takes part. > > Evil does not do good, so it causes discomfort. In this case it lets frauds > run the roost and they will employ fellow frauds, so the whole system is > corrupt to the core. Knowing this, it is futile to publish in the journals, as > they will reject on dogmatic grounds. Still, video is there, youtube is there, > you are there and I am here, so I published my findings on youtube in a manner > that I believe should convince honest and intelligent minds. > > And that is a cause for discomfort. > > > > It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like > > quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary > > Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how. > > Nuclear power plants can be explained very well by my equation > e=0.5mVVN(N-k). As are atom bombs. They are based upon extending Newtonian > ideas, with my addition that internal force existence creates and destroys > energy. This formula explains the workings of the universe very elegantly, and > my new ideas in physics are explained in IFE-8. > > So dom't say "I am not quite sure how". My original ideas support Newton > fully - they extend Newtonian ideas into the field of electrodynamics. > > > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. > > Calling one an anti-Semite (and thus an honorary Nazi) is an old trick and > a give-away. > > It has been applied to me often enough in the past. The last resort, what, after > failing miserably to find the slightest fault in my works, let alone my > character. > > Even if there are no brave and intelligent people to take up my science today, > I do my work in the expectation that this situation cannot last for ever. > > Because true science is for the ages. It will always have appeal to those > seeking truth. They will not be influenced by your smear tactics. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Pay no mind to the Odd Bodkin, he believes telling the Truth is...anti-semitism. In Odd Bodkin's book...if you tell the truth you're an anti-Semite. Actually "anti-Semitism" doesn't exist. It's just an "invention" by Jewish people to suffocate and strangle your free speech whenever you have a criticism about Jewish people in any shape of form or manner. In otherwords, It's okay to criticise everyone in the world *except* "them". But the truth is, "anti-Semitism" does not exist in this world... ..it only exist in the mind of a Jewish person. It doesn't exist anywhere else.