Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #404771

The Moon

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:51:37 -0600
Message-ID	<5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:51:36 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	The Moon
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	31
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-UPOdCAJlZ+VEkPBHskOD3Ly1pLmqD6BPNbixH4GZf2w+Ca5dvf7Hn1IfThT77zNImZs6mKI29rx6+oh!8pQjiWhbfkyYpGJoHUgpf/BljpCkFpq9zEpNxgauAkGX9s5z4lvr0tGHANVF+F/NIpuz9xBqnULv!HgWd3Fs3U7E=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1701
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:461985 sci.physics:612268 sci.physics.relativity:404771 alt.astronomy:288713

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/




It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon.




to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories.


they should be shot. caused they are stupid.






moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/




What does "new-theory" mean???? A new kook?


Yous people should not be allowed to come up with..."new-theory", cause they are gettin stupidier by the moment!

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 11:51 -0800
  Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 13:08 -0800
    Re: The Moon Nicholle Fiorillo <holhirlo@hololell.ho> - 2017-01-09 22:45 +0000
      Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:02 -0800
        Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 00:03 +0000
          Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 20:04 -0800
            Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 22:08 +0000
              Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:44 -0800
      Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:03 -0800
  Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:28 -0800
  Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:46 -0800
    Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:49 -0800
      Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 09:08 -0800
      Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:05 -0800
        Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:16 -0800
          Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-11 14:21 -0800
        Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-12 22:36 -0800
          Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 11:01 -0800
            Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 22:44 -0800
              Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-16 10:12 -0800
  Re: The Moon John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-10 15:49 -0800

csiph-web