Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #405180

Re: The Moon

Message-ID	<5876AFF9.49F1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2017-01-11 14:21 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: The Moon
References	<5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> <58747541.D1B@ix.netcom.com> <587475FB.2117@ix.netcom.com> <5875D920.C9E@ix.netcom.com> <5875DBE0.518E@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin
> > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/
> > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/
> > > > >
> > > > > It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon.
> > > > >
> > > > > to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know why yous even bother with these 'new theroies' about the moon, ...you're going to
> > > > throw them away anyway by next week.
> > >
> > > probably it's because no matter what theories yous come up with, there is always something ...missing.
> >
> > every single theory is missing
> >
> > something
> 
> and a hundred years go by and
> somebody comes along
> and fixes the theory..
> 
> and something is still missing.
> 
> Einstein died trying to find
> the theory of everything..
> 
> what he didn't realize was that
> 
> not that something was missing...but
> 
> that something
> 
> will
> always
> be
> missing.

A 'theory of everything' will have to include whatever is missing.

But if you don't know what is missing...how do you include it? Since, there will always be something....missing.


The Scientific Method is...missing something, isn't it????

Thread

The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 11:51 -0800
  Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 13:08 -0800
    Re: The Moon Nicholle Fiorillo <holhirlo@hololell.ho> - 2017-01-09 22:45 +0000
      Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:02 -0800
        Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 00:03 +0000
          Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 20:04 -0800
            Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 22:08 +0000
              Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:44 -0800
      Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:03 -0800
  Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:28 -0800
  Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:46 -0800
    Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:49 -0800
      Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 09:08 -0800
      Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:05 -0800
        Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:16 -0800
          Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-11 14:21 -0800
        Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-12 22:36 -0800
          Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 11:01 -0800
            Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 22:44 -0800
              Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-16 10:12 -0800
  Re: The Moon John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-10 15:49 -0800

csiph-web