Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396164

Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:34:07 -0500
Message-ID <5807E722.3D52@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:35:30 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, sci.math
Subject Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,
References <58051241.369A@ix.netcom.com> <58064977.648F@ix.netcom.com> <2e5bda71-c0c9-4d54-9e92-f100079f8ee8@googlegroups.com> <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com> <SPQR-9DDF10.13362919102016@news.giganews.com> <5807D567.3B2A@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 52
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-SlMrhdZyY8qlthgholklh8RuNK8e99ZoZIooHVMrhH2xpoqw68bKeOdLsTIvWYnT9jiNrwpze3ScRUU!1T+KB4oyhHFROHhDJOZ4DV6Z/mmz0QKS4x9KuU8eqsb/czB6saCroj66WFxBQGAeP6u2q9xDg7w8!tBzAnOP3TgA=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2440
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:454576 sci.physics:601713 sci.physics.relativity:396164 alt.astronomy:286898 sci.math:348995

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> SPQR wrote:
> >
> > In article <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com>,
> >  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Only i can...i'm a fuckin genuis.
> >
> > But not a genius of any sort!
> 
> well i certaintly don't fit any of your...categories, and i wouldn't want too.
> 
> Three roads diverged in a wood,
> and I— I took the one not traveled by,
> And that has made all the difference.


You might have to wait another ten years for this information to hit the News media...


There are Two Quadrillion Galaxies.


but the real number might be Centillions and Centillions galaxies.


i would have come up with a bigger number..but, i have to invent the word for it first.



Don't forget, there are Centillions and Centillions earth-like planets too...

(if you follow 'these people')


Truth is, there are no "earth-like" planets in existences...


there are none...


But if you want one, you just...'infect' any planet.


in·fect

        contaminate (air, water, planets etc.) with earth organisms.



Put a bunch of you guys on Mars and you'll probably try to FUCK the planet.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Dwain Foster <dwainbwe@tyrellysite.org> - 2016-10-22 13:44 +0000
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 16:31 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-19 20:16 -0400
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-18 10:56 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200

csiph-web